We have only one sample from a donor reportedly from the John Queen of Montgomery County lineage. Due to the results of the sample, it's unlikely that this sample truly represents this lineage. A sample from another major branch of this John Queen's line is required before any responsible tentative conclusions can be reached regarding the DNA of this John Queen. He absolutely cannot be ruled out; nor can he be ruled in. (Remember, the DNA is of the donor only.) Gene ----- Original Message ----- From: "Minch & Kartholl" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, July 31, 2005 4:17 PM Subject: [QUEEN] Do we have a DNA donor for John Queen line? >I have been reading the list archives from 2002 for posts on Gene's land >deed project and location of cemeteries. On June 1, 2002, Gene mentions a >strip of land sold by John Queen to Adam Mooney a few months after James >Queen sold an adjoining plot to Adam Mooney. Do we have a donor for this >John Queen line to determine if he is an old William descendant and >therefore related to James Queen? > > > --Phil Minch-- > Louisville, KY > > > ==== QUEEN Mailing List ==== > GenConnect Family Association: Queen > Surname Index > http://surhelp-bin.rootsweb.com/surindx.pl?site=88QUEEN > QUEEN YDNA PROJECT > http://www.familytreedna.com/surname_join.asp?code=X96855&special=True > http://www.ysearch.org/ > > ============================== > New! Family Tree Maker 2005. Build your tree and search for your ancestors > at the same time. Share your tree with family and friends. Learn more: > http://landing.ancestry.com/familytreemaker/2005/tour.aspx?sourceid=14599&targetid=5429 >