Yeah, my bride has long been telling me that she wears the PANTS in this family; so, this year her Christmas present is a chainsaw and some post hole diggers (manual). Gonna need lots of firewood and the back yard needs fencing in. It'll give her something to do while I play on this 'puter. Now, am I thoughtful...or what? Me ----- Original Message ----- From: "Carol A Queen" <postalq@grnco.net> > Hahaha... you guys are so behind the times.... > > We women have been wearing the PANTS for a long time ... snip > > Carol

If I must confess......do I have to confess? There is a photo at the company from which I draw a salary..... that reflects.... Me in a skirt. Not kilt; but skirt. Nope, the photo is not for sale. The lady that has the photo wants to live a long life. Gene ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rolla Queen" <rolla.queen@charter.net> To: "'O Eugene Queen'" <EQueen@lexcominc.net>; "'QResearchers'" <QUEEN@rootsweb.com> Sent: Saturday, December 02, 2006 7:36 PM Subject: RE: [QUEEN] Rolla's busy > Dresses. Riots. Southern California. > > We ARE cutting edge out here, Gene. Don't you think its time YOU got with > the program!? > > Rolla > > -----Original Message----- > From: queen-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:queen-bounces@rootsweb.com] On > Behalf Of O. Eugene Queen > Sent: Friday, December 01, 2006 3:12 PM > To: QResearchers > Subject: [QUEEN] Rolla's busy > > Greetings Queen Listers.... > > Not much happening these days in the way of DNA results at key markers, > but > I've promised to keep an eye opened while Rolla is "busy"...his words. > > Now, don't anyone tell him that I shared a bit of his e-mail with y'all; > but > here's part of what he said: > > "Dress rehearsal". > > "... up to my neck in all sorts of stuff...." > > "...almost turned into a riot." > > Now, I'm not too bright, but I think I can put two and two together and > get > three. > > Sounds as if he was out somewhere trying to slide a dress down over his > neck > and created quite a stir. If he gets wind that I've shared this with > y'all > and he claims that he was in some sort of "program", just snicker or > giggle > and play along with him. "Yeah, Rolla, we understand." > > Gene > >

Hahaha... you guys are so behind the times.... We women have been wearing the PANTS for a long time and we don't even care who knows it...LOL Carol

Dresses. Riots. Southern California. We ARE cutting edge out here, Gene. Don't you think its time YOU got with the program!? Rolla -----Original Message----- From: queen-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:queen-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of O. Eugene Queen Sent: Friday, December 01, 2006 3:12 PM To: QResearchers Subject: [QUEEN] Rolla's busy Greetings Queen Listers.... Not much happening these days in the way of DNA results at key markers, but I've promised to keep an eye opened while Rolla is "busy"...his words. Now, don't anyone tell him that I shared a bit of his e-mail with y'all; but here's part of what he said: "Dress rehearsal". "... up to my neck in all sorts of stuff...." "...almost turned into a riot." Now, I'm not too bright, but I think I can put two and two together and get three. Sounds as if he was out somewhere trying to slide a dress down over his neck and created quite a stir. If he gets wind that I've shared this with y'all and he claims that he was in some sort of "program", just snicker or giggle and play along with him. "Yeah, Rolla, we understand." Gene

What does this mean exactly? That there's no connection with the Gnatty Creek Queens, etc? Thanks. Beckie We have a descendant of Archibald who has join the McQueen DNA Study. His results did not match anyone greater than the 90th percentile, but it did pull a lot of results above the 70th percentile.

Greetings Queen Listers.... Not much happening these days in the way of DNA results at key markers, but I've promised to keep an eye opened while Rolla is "busy"...his words. Now, don't anyone tell him that I shared a bit of his e-mail with y'all; but here's part of what he said: "Dress rehearsal". "... up to my neck in all sorts of stuff...." "...almost turned into a riot." Now, I'm not too bright, but I think I can put two and two together and get three. Sounds as if he was out somewhere trying to slide a dress down over his neck and created quite a stir. If he gets wind that I've shared this with y'all and he claims that he was in some sort of "program", just snicker or giggle and play along with him. "Yeah, Rolla, we understand." Gene

Hey Queen researchers. We have a descendant of Archibald who has join the McQueen DNA Study. His results did not match anyone greater than the 90th percentile, but it did pull a lot of results above the 70th percentile. Take care Scott

Received notice from FTDNA today that sample from a documented descendant has now been received by them. Keep yer fingers crossed for helpful markers next year. Thanks to all who have helped from Canton, NC to Ohio to Paradise and beyond. Gene

My records indicate that Thomas Baxter Queen, son of Robert Henry & Nancy (Franklin) Queen married Jane Sutton. (Note: 1880 Federal Census - Jackson Co, NC - Webster, Page 263D - Thomas B. Queen, age 22, born NC (parents born NC); Sallie J., age 26, born NC (parents born NC) - Neighbors were Henry Sutton and Cissro L. Dills) -----Original Message----- From: queen-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:queen-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of O. Eugene Queen Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2006 7:46 PM To: QResearchers Subject: [QUEEN] Thomas C. Queen b. ca 1856 Thanks to all who have responded...and others who will respond. 1. Thomas Clingman, grandson of James Smith Queen, is a known as one listmate so well documented. 2. The most likely marriage of Thomas C. Queen, son of B.N. Queen was to a Jane Sutton on 1-11-1880 where a Thomas (NMI) Queen, age 24 married Jane, age 22. The Jackson County Marriage Index lists a T.C. Queen, too young; another Thomas, too old; and a Thomas A., too old. YDNA seems to have confirmed that my John R. of 1854 was not the son of B.N. Queen. We're trying to rule out the illegitimate son of B.N. in another situation; and I believe that we have done so. What's news and baffling to me is Thos. C. Queen, age 14 showing up in B.N. Queen's household in 1870; but not being there in 1860 at age 4. Gene When replying to a digest post, quote only the specific text to which you are replying, removing the rest of the digest from your reply. Also, remember to change the subject of your reply so that it coincides with the message subject to which you are replying. TO VIEW PREVIOUS EMAILS BY SUBJECT, GO TO THE THREADED ARCHIVES AT http://archiver.rootsweb.com/th/index/listowners TO VIEW PREVIOUS EMAILS BY DATES AND SUBJECT GO TO THE SEARCHABLE ARCHIVES AT http://archiver.rootsweb.com/th/index/listowners > http://webpages.charter.net/rlqueen/DNA/queenmarker.htm > > http://www.familytreedna.com/public/queenDNA/ ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to QUEEN-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Thanks to all who have responded...and others who will respond. 1. Thomas Clingman, grandson of James Smith Queen, is a known as one listmate so well documented. 2. The most likely marriage of Thomas C. Queen, son of B.N. Queen was to a Jane Sutton on 1-11-1880 where a Thomas (NMI) Queen, age 24 married Jane, age 22. The Jackson County Marriage Index lists a T.C. Queen, too young; another Thomas, too old; and a Thomas A., too old. YDNA seems to have confirmed that my John R. of 1854 was not the son of B.N. Queen. We're trying to rule out the illegitimate son of B.N. in another situation; and I believe that we have done so. What's news and baffling to me is Thos. C. Queen, age 14 showing up in B.N. Queen's household in 1870; but not being there in 1860 at age 4. Gene

Confused :) - need a little help - here is the info I have gathered. Thomas Clingman Queen (son of William Haynes & Sarah (Fisher) Queen, grandson of James Smith & Keziah (Haynes) Queen, great grandson of William Lewis & Margaret (Orr) Queen, 2nd great grandson of William Lewis & Margaret (Meredith) Queen, 3rd great grandson of William & Katherine (Lewis) Queen) 1920 Federal Census - Swain Co, NC - ED 182, Dwelling No. 23 - Clingman Queen, age 38, born NC (parents born NC); Miriam, age 28, born NC (parents born NC); Felix, age 8, born NC; Don, age 5, born NC; Vernon, age 2, born NC; Sarah A. (mother), age 61, born NC (parents born NC); Candles (brother), age 25, born NC; Henry (brother), age 19, born NC 1930 Federal Census - Swain Co, NC - ED 10, Highway 107, Dwelling No. 88 - Thomas C. Queen, age 43, born NC (parents born NC), married at age 29; Miriam M., age 38, born NC (parents born NC), married at age 18; Felix E., age 18, born NC; Daniel P., age 16, born NC; Vernon O., age 13, born NC; Hanes, age 10, born NC; Bessie, age 6, born NC; Inez (Ivey), age 3 3/12, born NC Sons of Thomas Clingman Queen: (1) Felix E. - born abt 1912 Swain Co, NC; (2) Daniel P. - born abt 1915 Swain Co, NC; (3) Vernon O. - born abt 1918 Swain Co, NC; (4) Haynes - born abt 1920 Swain Co, NC . WWI Registration - Swain Co, NC - Thomas Clingman Queen - born 11/21/1881; nearest relative is Miriam M. Queen (wife); has black eyes and black hair . WWI Registration - Thomas Clingman Queen - Culpeper VA - born 11/21/1881 in Oconalufty, NC; Height: 6'1''; Weight: 160; Three fingers and thumb cut off on right hand - registered 04/27/1942 Thomas Coleman Queen (son of Benjamin Nicholson Queen & Martha Hooper, grandson of William Brown & Mary (Nicholson) Queen, great grandson of Samuel & (Dicey) Roles Queen) 1880 Federal Census - Buncombe Co, NC - Leicester, Page 42D - J.M. Green, age 40, born NC (parents born NC); Laura L., age 34, born NC (father born VA, mother born NC); Nat T., age 12, born NC; Eddie G., age 9, born NC; Otis L., age 5, born NC; Ginny L., (cousin), age 15, born NC (parents born NC); Coleman Queen, (other), age 18, born NC (parents born NC) - Neighbors were S.C. Wright and Levy Plommons 1900 Federal Census - Haywood Co, NC - Pigeon, ED 30, Dwelling No. 246 - Coleman Queen, born 04/1855 NC (parents born NC), married for 16 years; Roxanna, born 02/1860 NC (parents born NC), has had 6 children with 4 currently living; Emma, born 10/1883 NC; Forest, born 01/1887 NC; Doise (son), born 02/1889 NC; James, born 07/1895 NC - Neighbors were Absalom Henson and Sophia Johnson 1910 Federal Census - Haywood Co, NC - Pigeon, ED 66, Dwelling No. 139 - T. Coleman Queen, age 55, married 1 time for 27 years, born NC (parents born NC); N. Roxanna, age 49, born NC (parents born NC), had had 7 children with 5 currently living; James R., age 14, born NC; Fred A., age 9, born NC - Neighbors were Forest M. Queen and E. Cook 1920 Federal Census - Haywood Co, NC - Pigeon, ED 79, Page 4A, Dwelling No. 73 - T. Coleman Queen, age 60, born NC (parents born NC); N. Roxanna, age 59, born NC (parents born NC); Fred A., age 18, born NC - Neighbors were James R. Queen and Dan Christopher 1930 Federal Census - Haywood Co, NC - ED 16, Dwelling No. 89, Henson Cove Road - Fred A. Queen, age 29, born NC (parents born NC), married at age 20; Mabry D., age 27, born NC (parents born NC), married at age 18; Imogene J., age 8, born NC; Arnold T., age 5, born NC; Roxanna L. (mother), age 69, born NC (parents born NC), widowed Sons of Thomas Coleman Queen: (1) Forest E. - born 01/1887 Haywood Co, NC (gone in 1910); (2) Doise - born 02/1889 Haywood Co, NC (gone in 1910); (3) James R. - born 07/13/1895 Haywood Co, NC (gone in 1920*); (4) Fred A. - born 12/24/1900 Haywood Co, NC (gone in 1930*) . North Carolina Death Records - Haywood Co, NC - Nancy R. Queen - born abt 1861; died 03/06/1931 in Haywood Co, NC

Well, There is a TC Owen 4 years old in the 1860 census, but the name is definitely Owen. I thought at first it might be Thomas. But, take a look and see what you think (I think it really is the Owen family). There are 2 Hooper families not far from the Queens, but no TC or Thomas living with them. Gene, your puzzles are getting harder to solve...LOL. Carol Gene wrote: > B.N. Queen m. Mary Carson 11-8-1855 > > Thos. C. Queen born 12-17-1855 - but not in B.N. household in 1860. > > B.N. acknowledged paternity of a child of Martha Hooper in June 1856 > > 1860 census lists B. N. and Mary with child W. A. Queen, age 2 (this would > be William Alonzo) > > 1870 census lists B.N. and Mary with child Thos.C. Queen, age 14 and Wm A, > age 12 and others > > Comment: Strange that 1860 would "miss" a 4 year old child, the eldest. > > Question: Could Thomas C. Queen have been the child of B.N. and Martha > Hooper; now living with dad, B.N. in 1870? > > Does anyone know? Does anyone know place and year of death of this Thomas > Clingman Queen? > > Thanks, > > Gene > > > When replying to a digest post, quote only the specific text to which you > are replying, removing the rest of the digest from your reply. Also, > remember to change the subject of your reply so that it coincides with the > message subject to which you are replying. > > > TO VIEW PREVIOUS EMAILS BY SUBJECT, GO TO THE THREADED ARCHIVES AT > http://archiver.rootsweb.com/th/index/listowners > > TO VIEW PREVIOUS EMAILS BY DATES AND SUBJECT GO TO THE SEARCHABLE ARCHIVES > AT http://archiver.rootsweb.com/th/index/listowners > >> http://webpages.charter.net/rlqueen/DNA/queenmarker.htm >> >> http://www.familytreedna.com/public/queenDNA/ > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > QUEEN-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes > in the subject and the body of the message

B.N. Queen m. Mary Carson 11-8-1855 Thos. C. Queen born 12-17-1855 - but not in B.N. household in 1860. B.N. acknowledged paternity of a child of Martha Hooper in June 1856 1860 census lists B. N. and Mary with child W. A. Queen, age 2 (this would be William Alonzo) 1870 census lists B.N. and Mary with child Thos.C. Queen, age 14 and Wm A, age 12 and others Comment: Strange that 1860 would "miss" a 4 year old child, the eldest. Question: Could Thomas C. Queen have been the child of B.N. and Martha Hooper; now living with dad, B.N. in 1870? Does anyone know? Does anyone know place and year of death of this Thomas Clingman Queen? Thanks, Gene

The following URL has: "Notes--Tom's date of birth and death taken from his tombstone and death certificate. His father and mother verified by death certificate and by Annie Jones and Edna Queen"; however, there is NO death date listed! http://www.smokykin.com/ged/f005/f21/a0052109.htm Linda

Anyone on Queen-L documented as descendant of subject who was probably a son of Richard Queen? Thanks, Gene

Thomas Clingman Queen (b. 12-17-1855), son of B.N. Queen of the Samuel Queen of 1759 lineage. Yes/no? Thomas' name does not appear on the 1860 Jackson County census in the household. His name does appear at age 14 in the 1870 household. Can/will someone share a bit of info regarding Thomas after 1870? Did he live to adulthood? Did he marry, live in Jackson County, etc.? Thanks, Gene

Thanks to all who have offered their assistance with the Paradise, CA project. Contact has been made and it appears that there will be a home run on this research effort. Now, if I can just make it to Paradise. No real rush, but in a hundred years or so. Gene

Who, oh who, lives in Northern California? Okay, who lives in Southern California and has a team of oxen and a wagon or other means of transportation to visit Paradise and do some very important Queen research legwork? There's a man up there with an unlisted phone number. I want/need to talk with him or his wife. Failure is not an option. Or, when the team of oxen walk into his driveway; betcha that he'll talk to YOU, the DEDICATED researcher. Promise to plow his garden for spring planting. Gene

Thanks Glenda, This was the memory jogger I needed. Jeffrey now has found his ancestors. Elias Queen and maybe old Richard. Gene ----- Original Message ----- From: "GlendaP" <gprieba@cox.net> To: "QResearchers" <QUEEN@rootsweb.com>; "O Eugene Queen" <EQueen@lexcominc.net> Sent: Sunday, November 26, 2006 2:21 PM Subject: Re: [QUEEN] Another Elizabeth Queen > How about > 1880 census > > Thomas Queen 25 > Elizabeth Queen 24 > Mary Etta Queen 6 > Richard Queen 4 > Wm. S. Queen 1 month > Lovelady, Burke North Carolina > > 1870 Lovelady Burke NC > Elias Queen 55 > Mary 49 > Alfred 21 > Elvina 20 > Thomas 18 > Elias 17 > Mary 15 > William 10 > > 1860 Whiteside Rutherford NC > Elias Queen 44 > Mary Queen 44 > Alfred Queen 15 > Elvira Queen 13 > Thomas Queen 12 > Laura Queen 10 > Elias Queen 9 > Mary Queen 7 > Wm Queen 2 > > Or check out post by > From: "Vicky Hutchings" <vhutch@charter.net> > Subject: Descendents of Elias Queen of Rutherford/Burke Co, NC > Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 19:25:39 -0600 > > Glenda > > > > > > > > ---- "O. Eugene Queen" <EQueen@lexcominc.net> wrote: >> Trying to help another find his family. Any ideas as to who this >> Elizabeth Queen was? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Gene >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: Jeffery Queen >> To: O Eugene Queen >> Sent: Saturday, November 25, 2006 11:09 AM >> Subject: Re: Queen Family >> >> >> OH YES! Forest was the brother I remember John L. having. >> >> >> On 11/25/06, O. Eugene Queen <EQueen@lexcominc.net> wrote: >> Also....just looking: >> >> 1900 Burke County: >> Elizabeth Queen, 46 >> John L. Queen, 7 >> Forest E. Queen, 9 >> James A. Queen, 4 >> >> Gene

This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list. Surnames: Queen Classification: Query Message Board URL: http://boards.ancestry.com/mbexec/msg/rw/3YBBAEB/925 Message Board Post: Seeking contact with male descendant of following lineage: William Merritt Queen (b. 1857) married Mary Frances Rickman. Son, Jesse Franklin Queen (b. 1890) married Dora Ann Dalton.