Hi Luella Hi Luella - I too have Anne LeNeuf but I didn't have her father Michel so have added him. I do have the year she and Antoine Desrosiers were married as 1649 and a bit more info in a previous message copied here: QUOTE If you have the surname DESROSIERS in your lineage (dit names are Dargis/Dargy/Dargie, Dutremble, Desilets, and LeFreniere), you are probably a direct descendant of Antoine Desrosiers and Anne LeNeuf ( http://www.apointinhistory.net/desrosiers.php ). This is a DOCUMENTED royal lineage to Charlemagne ( http://www.francogene.com/gfna/gfna/998/qrd30.htm ). Anne LeNeuf's grandmother was Jeanne Le Marchand. Her lineage to Charlemagne has been documented, and she is an accepted gateway ancestor for the lineage society Order of the Crown of Charlemagne ( http://www.charlemagne.org/ ). The article documenting the lineage from Jeanne Le Marchand to Charlemagne was originally published in French in the "Mémoires de la Société généalogique canadienne-française." It was later translated and published in English in a 3-part series in "Michigan's Habitant Heritage" : Part I, 23:4 (October 2002): 149-159; Part II, 24:1 (January 2003): 1-9; and Part III, 24:2 (April 2003): 49-55. UNQUOTE Joyce On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 luella wrote: I do have a Anne DESROSIERS b. 12 NOV 1661-Trois-Rivieres and m to JacquesTURCOT b 4 Sep 1652. Parents of Anne are Anne LANEUF DU HERISSON b. abt 1631 m to Antoine DESROSIERS b. 14 Apr 1617 I don't have anything further back except that Anne's father is Michel LANEUF b abt 1600, but I will be reading more about this part of the family--alas, so many members; so little time. CLIPPED THE REST. On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 luella wrote: > Good Morning, Debbie, > THANKS! This email certainly is interesting. I do have a Anne > DESROSIERS b. 12 NOV 1661-Trois-Rivieres and m to JacquesTURCOT b 4 > Sep 1652. Parents of Anne are Anne LANEUF DU HERISSON b. abt 1631 m > to Antoine DESROSIERS b. 14 Apr 1617 I don't have anything further > back except that Anne's father is Michel LANEUF b abt 1600, but I will > be reading more about this part of the family--alas, so many members; > so little time. CLIPPED THE REST. > > > > >