By any chance do you have any information on David Baldwin who was not a Quaker, but lived and married among them in Wrightsboro, Georgia? He was a captain in the Revolutionary War. Need to find where he was from and anything on his famiily. I am assuming that Baldwins in Indiana might be related. His wife Sarah was/is thought to have been an Owen. Joseph Moore Georgia In a message dated 5/16/2013 3:32:46 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, quaker-roots-request@rootsweb.com writes: Today's Topics: 1. Baldwin sisters (Dale Harguess) 2. Re: Baldwin sisters (grannyroots) 3. Re: Baldwin sisters (Daniel W Treadway) 4. Re: Baldwin sisters (Thomas Hamm) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 09:07:58 -0700 From: Dale Harguess <daleharguess4@gmail.com> Subject: [Q-R] Baldwin sisters To: QUAKER-ROOTS <QUAKER-ROOTS@rootsweb.com> Message-ID: <CAPG4UJbpGNk+1-5HXzY1YPnadzCSAv2x3DQaSxbXUaHPJi_aPQ@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I have a puzzle that I hope someone out there in Quaker land can help me with. On page 110 of the Abstracts of the records of the Society of Friends in Indiana there are two entries that I am a little confused about. In the section of Back Creek meeting it has an entry on 2-19-1841 "Susannah, Grant Co, dt Charles & Sarah (dec) m Jesse Dillon of Madison Co, at Back Creek MM. Directly below it is another entry on 3-25-1841 "Sarah, Grant Co, dt Charles & Sarah (dec) m Jesse Dillon of Madison Co at Back Creek MM. I'm pretty sure these are not the actual marriage dates but are actually the dates that the events were officially entered into the minutes. I cannot find anywhere where either Susannah or Sarah died but Jesse later married a Lydia Faulkner so I assume that if he married Susannah and later her sister they must have died. I forgot to mention that their maiden name was Baldwin. Does anyone out there know anything that would help me figure this one out? Thanks, Dale in California ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 12:09:52 -0400 From: grannyroots <grannyroots@iowatelecom.net> Subject: Re: [Q-R] Baldwin sisters To: Dale Harguess <daleharguess4@gmail.com> Cc: Quaker-Roots-L <QUAKER-ROOTS-L@rootsweb.com> Message-ID: <C15265E6-6A94-4476-8B74-865246394B1E@iowatelecom.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii The couple went before the men's and the women's meeting to be allowed to marry. When they were liberated to marry they could. You really need to see the original records to see where they got the dates. It sounds like to me you have one date when they were liberated to marry and the second when it was reported back they were married. Neither one would be the actual date of marriage. Jean Leeper grannyroots@iowatelecom.net Sent from my iPad On May 15, 2013, at 12:07 PM, Dale Harguess <daleharguess4@gmail.com> wrote: > I have a puzzle that I hope someone out there in Quaker land can help me > with. On page 110 of the Abstracts of the records of the Society of > Friends in Indiana there are two entries that I am a little confused about. > In the section of Back Creek meeting it has an entry on 2-19-1841 > "Susannah, Grant Co, dt Charles & Sarah (dec) m Jesse Dillon of Madison Co, > at Back Creek MM. > > Directly below it is another entry on 3-25-1841 "Sarah, Grant Co, dt > Charles & Sarah (dec) m Jesse Dillon of Madison Co at Back Creek MM. > > I'm pretty sure these are not the actual marriage dates but are actually > the dates that the events were officially entered into the minutes. I > cannot find anywhere where either Susannah or Sarah died but Jesse later > married a Lydia Faulkner so I assume that if he married Susannah and later > her sister they must have died. > I forgot to mention that their maiden name was Baldwin. > Does anyone out there know anything that would help me figure this one out? > Thanks, > Dale in California > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to QUAKER-ROOTS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 13:40:05 -0500 From: "Daniel W Treadway" <treadway@netins.net> Subject: Re: [Q-R] Baldwin sisters To: Dale Harguess <daleharguess4@gmail.com>, QUAKER-ROOTS <QUAKER-ROOTS@rootsweb.com> Message-ID: <web-29210312@cgpb4.cgp.netins.net> Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1; format="flowed" On Wed, 15 May 2013 09:07:58 -0700 Dale Harguess <daleharguess4@gmail.com> wrote: > I have a puzzle that I hope someone out there in Quaker land can >help me > with. On page 110 of the Abstracts of the records of the Society of >Friends in Indiana there are two entries that I am a little confused >about. > In the section of Back Creek meeting it has an entry on 2-19-1841 > "Susannah, Grant Co, dt Charles & Sarah (dec) m Jesse Dillon of >Madison Co, > at Back Creek MM. > > Directly below it is another entry on 3-25-1841 "Sarah, Grant Co, dt > Charles & Sarah (dec) m Jesse Dillon of Madison Co at Back Creek MM. > > I'm pretty sure these are not the actual marriage dates but are >actually > the dates that the events were officially entered into the minutes. > I > cannot find anywhere where either Susannah or Sarah died but Jesse >later > married a Lydia Faulkner so I assume that if he married Susannah and >later > her sister they must have died. > I forgot to mention that their maiden name was Baldwin. > Does anyone out there know anything that would help me figure this >one out? > Thanks, > Dale in California > Dale, Back Creek Meeting was created in 1838 by setting off from Mississinewa (now Marion) meeting. Mississiniewa records (Abstracts of the records of the Society of Friends in Indiana, part 3, page 2) show Charles and Sarah Baldwin did indeed have daughters named Susannah, born 6-3-1808, and Sarah b 2-16-1824. Both are shown as being buried at Back Creek. http://www.findagrave.com/cgi-bin/fg.cgi?page=gr&GSln=Baldwin&GSiman=1&GScid =1980843&GRid=62642206& is an entry for Susannah (Baldwin) Dillon, born Jun 3, 1808, died Oct 6, 1844, buried Back Creek Friends Cemetery. I note that on page 116, where Dillon marriages appear, Jesse's marriage to Susannah is shown, and in 1847 a marriage to Lydia Johnson in 1847. (For this one, Jesse's parents' names do not appear, so it is possible it is a different Jesse Dillon.) This all makes me think the wrong groom's name appears in the entry for Sarah's marriage entry on page 110. So who could Sarah's husband have been? Searching for the first name Sarah (any surname) born in 1824, among the burial listed for Back Creek Cemetery, http://www.findagrave.com/cgi-bin/fg.cgi?page=gsr&GSiman=1&GScid=1980843&GSf n=sarah&GSln= I see a Sarah Newby who died in 1911. I don't see anything about this Sarah Newby in Back Creek records (page 131) Ahhh. Here it is! On page 139. 3-25-1841 Samuel V [Stanfield] of Grant County, son of David and Elizabeth, married Sarah Baldwin, daughter of Charles and Sarah (dec), Grant County, at Back Creek MH. Samuel and Sarah were both disowned in 1844 for joining another society. It appears she is buried at Clear Lake, Iowa, rather than at Back Creek. http://www.findagrave.com/cgi-bin/fg.cgi?page=gr&GSln=stanfield&GSfn=sarah&G Sby=1824&GSbyrel=in&GSdyrel=all&GSob=n&GRid=79693856&df=all& -- Dan Treadway P. O. Box 72 Gilbert IA 50105 treadway@netins.net http://showcase.netins.net/web/treadway/ ------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 15:12:45 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Hamm <tomh@earlham.edu> Subject: Re: [Q-R] Baldwin sisters To: Daniel W Treadway <treadway@netins.net> Cc: QUAKER-ROOTS <QUAKER-ROOTS@rootsweb.com> Message-ID: <47706fd8-f5d1-4180-9c20-b6a11494e319@baris.earlham.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 I have the Back Creek marriage record book in front of me. Dan has resolved the mystery. Jesse Dillon married Susannah Baldwin 2-19-1841. Samuel Stanfield married Sarah Baldwin 3-25-1841. Tom Hamm ----- Original Message ----- From: "Daniel W Treadway" <treadway@netins.net> To: "Dale Harguess" <daleharguess4@gmail.com>, "QUAKER-ROOTS" <QUAKER-ROOTS@rootsweb.com> Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2013 2:40:05 PM Subject: Re: [Q-R] Baldwin sisters On Wed, 15 May 2013 09:07:58 -0700 Dale Harguess <daleharguess4@gmail.com> wrote: > I have a puzzle that I hope someone out there in Quaker land can >help me > with. On page 110 of the Abstracts of the records of the Society of >Friends in Indiana there are two entries that I am a little confused >about. > In the section of Back Creek meeting it has an entry on 2-19-1841 > "Susannah, Grant Co, dt Charles & Sarah (dec) m Jesse Dillon of >Madison Co, > at Back Creek MM. > > Directly below it is another entry on 3-25-1841 "Sarah, Grant Co, dt > Charles & Sarah (dec) m Jesse Dillon of Madison Co at Back Creek MM. > > I'm pretty sure these are not the actual marriage dates but are >actually > the dates that the events were officially entered into the minutes. > I > cannot find anywhere where either Susannah or Sarah died but Jesse >later > married a Lydia Faulkner so I assume that if he married Susannah and >later > her sister they must have died. > I forgot to mention that their maiden name was Baldwin. > Does anyone out there know anything that would help me figure this >one out? > Thanks, > Dale in California > Dale, Back Creek Meeting was created in 1838 by setting off from Mississinewa (now Marion) meeting. Mississiniewa records (Abstracts of the records of the Society of Friends in Indiana, part 3, page 2) show Charles and Sarah Baldwin did indeed have daughters named Susannah, born 6-3-1808, and Sarah b 2-16-1824. Both are shown as being buried at Back Creek. http://www.findagrave.com/cgi-bin/fg.cgi?page=gr&GSln=Baldwin&GSiman=1&GScid =1980843&GRid=62642206& is an entry for Susannah (Baldwin) Dillon, born Jun 3, 1808, died Oct 6, 1844, buried Back Creek Friends Cemetery. I note that on page 116, where Dillon marriages appear, Jesse's marriage to Susannah is shown, and in 1847 a marriage to Lydia Johnson in 1847. (For this one, Jesse's parents' names do not appear, so it is possible it is a different Jesse Dillon.) This all makes me think the wrong groom's name appears in the entry for Sarah's marriage entry on page 110. So who could Sarah's husband have been? Searching for the first name Sarah (any surname) born in 1824, among the burial listed for Back Creek Cemetery, http://www.findagrave.com/cgi-bin/fg.cgi?page=gsr&GSiman=1&GScid=1980843&GSf n=sarah&GSln= I see a Sarah Newby who died in 1911. I don't see anything about this Sarah Newby in Back Creek records (page 131) Ahhh. Here it is! On page 139. 3-25-1841 Samuel V [Stanfield] of Grant County, son of David and Elizabeth, married Sarah Baldwin, daughter of Charles and Sarah (dec), Grant County, at Back Creek MH. Samuel and Sarah were both disowned in 1844 for joining another society. It appears she is buried at Clear Lake, Iowa, rather than at Back Creek. http://www.findagrave.com/cgi-bin/fg.cgi?page=gr&GSln=stanfield&GSfn=sarah&G Sby=1824&GSbyrel=in&GSdyrel=all&GSob=n&GRid=79693856&df=all& -- Dan Treadway P. O. Box 72 Gilbert IA 50105 treadway@netins.net http://showcase.netins.net/web/treadway/ ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to QUAKER-ROOTS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message ------------------------------ To contact the QUAKER-ROOTS list administrator, send an email to QUAKER-ROOTS-admin@rootsweb.com. To post a message to the QUAKER-ROOTS mailing list, send an email to QUAKER-ROOTS@rootsweb.com. __________________________________________________________ To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to QUAKER-ROOTS-request@rootsweb.com with the word "unsubscribe" without the quotes in the subject and the body of the email with no additional text. End of QUAKER-ROOTS Digest, Vol 8, Issue 42 *******************************************