RootsWeb.com Mailing Lists
Total: 3/3
    1. Re: [Q-R] Baldwin sisters
    2. Daniel W Treadway
    3. On Wed, 15 May 2013 09:07:58 -0700 Dale Harguess <daleharguess4@gmail.com> wrote: > I have a puzzle that I hope someone out there in Quaker land can >help me > with. On page 110 of the Abstracts of the records of the Society of >Friends in Indiana there are two entries that I am a little confused >about. > In the section of Back Creek meeting it has an entry on 2-19-1841 > "Susannah, Grant Co, dt Charles & Sarah (dec) m Jesse Dillon of >Madison Co, > at Back Creek MM. > > Directly below it is another entry on 3-25-1841 "Sarah, Grant Co, dt > Charles & Sarah (dec) m Jesse Dillon of Madison Co at Back Creek MM. > > I'm pretty sure these are not the actual marriage dates but are >actually > the dates that the events were officially entered into the minutes. > I > cannot find anywhere where either Susannah or Sarah died but Jesse >later > married a Lydia Faulkner so I assume that if he married Susannah and >later > her sister they must have died. > I forgot to mention that their maiden name was Baldwin. > Does anyone out there know anything that would help me figure this >one out? > Thanks, > Dale in California > Dale, Back Creek Meeting was created in 1838 by setting off from Mississinewa (now Marion) meeting. Mississiniewa records (Abstracts of the records of the Society of Friends in Indiana, part 3, page 2) show Charles and Sarah Baldwin did indeed have daughters named Susannah, born 6-3-1808, and Sarah b 2-16-1824. Both are shown as being buried at Back Creek. http://www.findagrave.com/cgi-bin/fg.cgi?page=gr&GSln=Baldwin&GSiman=1&GScid=1980843&GRid=62642206& is an entry for Susannah (Baldwin) Dillon, born Jun 3, 1808, died Oct 6, 1844, buried Back Creek Friends Cemetery. I note that on page 116, where Dillon marriages appear, Jesse's marriage to Susannah is shown, and in 1847 a marriage to Lydia Johnson in 1847. (For this one, Jesse's parents' names do not appear, so it is possible it is a different Jesse Dillon.) This all makes me think the wrong groom's name appears in the entry for Sarah's marriage entry on page 110. So who could Sarah's husband have been? Searching for the first name Sarah (any surname) born in 1824, among the burial listed for Back Creek Cemetery, http://www.findagrave.com/cgi-bin/fg.cgi?page=gsr&GSiman=1&GScid=1980843&GSfn=sarah&GSln= I see a Sarah Newby who died in 1911. I don't see anything about this Sarah Newby in Back Creek records (page 131) Ahhh. Here it is! On page 139. 3-25-1841 Samuel V [Stanfield] of Grant County, son of David and Elizabeth, married Sarah Baldwin, daughter of Charles and Sarah (dec), Grant County, at Back Creek MH. Samuel and Sarah were both disowned in 1844 for joining another society. It appears she is buried at Clear Lake, Iowa, rather than at Back Creek. http://www.findagrave.com/cgi-bin/fg.cgi?page=gr&GSln=stanfield&GSfn=sarah&GSby=1824&GSbyrel=in&GSdyrel=all&GSob=n&GRid=79693856&df=all& -- Dan Treadway P. O. Box 72 Gilbert IA 50105 treadway@netins.net http://showcase.netins.net/web/treadway/

    05/15/2013 07:40:05
    1. Re: [Q-R] Baldwin sisters
    2. Thomas Hamm
    3. I have the Back Creek marriage record book in front of me. Dan has resolved the mystery. Jesse Dillon married Susannah Baldwin 2-19-1841. Samuel Stanfield married Sarah Baldwin 3-25-1841. Tom Hamm ----- Original Message ----- From: "Daniel W Treadway" <treadway@netins.net> To: "Dale Harguess" <daleharguess4@gmail.com>, "QUAKER-ROOTS" <QUAKER-ROOTS@rootsweb.com> Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2013 2:40:05 PM Subject: Re: [Q-R] Baldwin sisters On Wed, 15 May 2013 09:07:58 -0700 Dale Harguess <daleharguess4@gmail.com> wrote: > I have a puzzle that I hope someone out there in Quaker land can >help me > with. On page 110 of the Abstracts of the records of the Society of >Friends in Indiana there are two entries that I am a little confused >about. > In the section of Back Creek meeting it has an entry on 2-19-1841 > "Susannah, Grant Co, dt Charles & Sarah (dec) m Jesse Dillon of >Madison Co, > at Back Creek MM. > > Directly below it is another entry on 3-25-1841 "Sarah, Grant Co, dt > Charles & Sarah (dec) m Jesse Dillon of Madison Co at Back Creek MM. > > I'm pretty sure these are not the actual marriage dates but are >actually > the dates that the events were officially entered into the minutes. > I > cannot find anywhere where either Susannah or Sarah died but Jesse >later > married a Lydia Faulkner so I assume that if he married Susannah and >later > her sister they must have died. > I forgot to mention that their maiden name was Baldwin. > Does anyone out there know anything that would help me figure this >one out? > Thanks, > Dale in California > Dale, Back Creek Meeting was created in 1838 by setting off from Mississinewa (now Marion) meeting. Mississiniewa records (Abstracts of the records of the Society of Friends in Indiana, part 3, page 2) show Charles and Sarah Baldwin did indeed have daughters named Susannah, born 6-3-1808, and Sarah b 2-16-1824. Both are shown as being buried at Back Creek. http://www.findagrave.com/cgi-bin/fg.cgi?page=gr&GSln=Baldwin&GSiman=1&GScid=1980843&GRid=62642206& is an entry for Susannah (Baldwin) Dillon, born Jun 3, 1808, died Oct 6, 1844, buried Back Creek Friends Cemetery. I note that on page 116, where Dillon marriages appear, Jesse's marriage to Susannah is shown, and in 1847 a marriage to Lydia Johnson in 1847. (For this one, Jesse's parents' names do not appear, so it is possible it is a different Jesse Dillon.) This all makes me think the wrong groom's name appears in the entry for Sarah's marriage entry on page 110. So who could Sarah's husband have been? Searching for the first name Sarah (any surname) born in 1824, among the burial listed for Back Creek Cemetery, http://www.findagrave.com/cgi-bin/fg.cgi?page=gsr&GSiman=1&GScid=1980843&GSfn=sarah&GSln= I see a Sarah Newby who died in 1911. I don't see anything about this Sarah Newby in Back Creek records (page 131) Ahhh. Here it is! On page 139. 3-25-1841 Samuel V [Stanfield] of Grant County, son of David and Elizabeth, married Sarah Baldwin, daughter of Charles and Sarah (dec), Grant County, at Back Creek MH. Samuel and Sarah were both disowned in 1844 for joining another society. It appears she is buried at Clear Lake, Iowa, rather than at Back Creek. http://www.findagrave.com/cgi-bin/fg.cgi?page=gr&GSln=stanfield&GSfn=sarah&GSby=1824&GSbyrel=in&GSdyrel=all&GSob=n&GRid=79693856&df=all& -- Dan Treadway P. O. Box 72 Gilbert IA 50105 treadway@netins.net http://showcase.netins.net/web/treadway/ ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to QUAKER-ROOTS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

    05/15/2013 09:12:45
    1. Re: [Q-R] Baldwin sisters
    2. Stewart Baldwin
    3. I have done extensive research on this Baldwin family, and this one also confused me at first, because I only had photocopies of the Baldwin pages from Heiss's published Indiana Quaker records, but soon after I managed to purchase a copy of these records, and I came to the same conclusion as Dan and Tom. It appears that when Sarah's marriage was being typed in, the typist's eye accidently skipped up to the marriage of her sister. Since then, I have researched other records (probate, census, etc.) which confirm the same picture. Susannah Baldwin married (as his third wife) Jesse Dillon, and her sister Sarah Baldwin married Samuel Vernon Stanfield. Stewart Baldwin ----- Original Message ----- From: "Thomas Hamm" <tomh@earlham.edu> To: "Daniel W Treadway" <treadway@netins.net> Cc: "QUAKER-ROOTS" <QUAKER-ROOTS@rootsweb.com> Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2013 2:12 PM Subject: Re: [Q-R] Baldwin sisters >I have the Back Creek marriage record book in front of me. Dan has resolved >the mystery. Jesse Dillon married Susannah Baldwin 2-19-1841. Samuel >Stanfield married Sarah Baldwin 3-25-1841. > > Tom Hamm > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Daniel W Treadway" <treadway@netins.net> > To: "Dale Harguess" <daleharguess4@gmail.com>, "QUAKER-ROOTS" > <QUAKER-ROOTS@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2013 2:40:05 PM > Subject: Re: [Q-R] Baldwin sisters > > On Wed, 15 May 2013 09:07:58 -0700 > Dale Harguess <daleharguess4@gmail.com> wrote: >> I have a puzzle that I hope someone out there in Quaker land can >>help me >> with. On page 110 of the Abstracts of the records of the Society of >>Friends in Indiana there are two entries that I am a little confused >>about. >> In the section of Back Creek meeting it has an entry on 2-19-1841 >> "Susannah, Grant Co, dt Charles & Sarah (dec) m Jesse Dillon of >>Madison Co, >> at Back Creek MM. >> >> Directly below it is another entry on 3-25-1841 "Sarah, Grant Co, dt >> Charles & Sarah (dec) m Jesse Dillon of Madison Co at Back Creek MM. >> >> I'm pretty sure these are not the actual marriage dates but are >>actually >> the dates that the events were officially entered into the minutes. >> I >> cannot find anywhere where either Susannah or Sarah died but Jesse >>later >> married a Lydia Faulkner so I assume that if he married Susannah and >>later >> her sister they must have died. >> I forgot to mention that their maiden name was Baldwin. >> Does anyone out there know anything that would help me figure this >>one out? >> Thanks, >> Dale in California >> > > Dale, > > Back Creek Meeting was created in 1838 by setting off from > Mississinewa (now Marion) meeting. Mississiniewa records (Abstracts > of the records of the Society of Friends in Indiana, part 3, page 2) > show Charles and Sarah Baldwin did indeed have daughters named > Susannah, born 6-3-1808, and Sarah b 2-16-1824. Both are shown as > being buried at Back Creek. > > http://www.findagrave.com/cgi-bin/fg.cgi?page=gr&GSln=Baldwin&GSiman=1&GScid=1980843&GRid=62642206& > is an entry for Susannah (Baldwin) Dillon, born Jun 3, 1808, died Oct > 6, 1844, buried Back Creek Friends Cemetery. > > I note that on page 116, where Dillon marriages appear, Jesse's > marriage to Susannah is shown, and in 1847 a marriage to Lydia Johnson > in 1847. (For this one, Jesse's parents' names do not appear, so it > is possible it is a different Jesse Dillon.) > > This all makes me think the wrong groom's name appears in the entry > for Sarah's marriage entry on page 110. > > So who could Sarah's husband have been? > > Searching for the first name Sarah (any surname) born in 1824, among > the burial listed for Back Creek Cemetery, > http://www.findagrave.com/cgi-bin/fg.cgi?page=gsr&GSiman=1&GScid=1980843&GSfn=sarah&GSln= > I see a Sarah Newby who died in 1911. I don't see anything about > this Sarah Newby in Back Creek records (page 131) > > > Ahhh. Here it is! On page 139. 3-25-1841 Samuel V [Stanfield] of > Grant County, son of David and Elizabeth, married Sarah Baldwin, > daughter of Charles and Sarah (dec), Grant County, at Back Creek MH. > Samuel and Sarah were both disowned in 1844 for joining another > society. > > It appears she is buried at Clear Lake, Iowa, rather than at Back > Creek. > http://www.findagrave.com/cgi-bin/fg.cgi?page=gr&GSln=stanfield&GSfn=sarah&GSby=1824&GSbyrel=in&GSdyrel=all&GSob=n&GRid=79693856&df=all& > > > -- > Dan Treadway > P. O. Box 72 Gilbert IA 50105 > treadway@netins.net > http://showcase.netins.net/web/treadway/ > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > QUAKER-ROOTS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > QUAKER-ROOTS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message

    05/16/2013 04:55:41