Note: The Rootsweb Mailing Lists will be shut down on April 6, 2023. (More info)
RootsWeb.com Mailing Lists
Total: 1/1
    1. Re: [QC-ETANGLO] 1851 Census Index
    2. M_Ardron1
    3. National Archives film C-1143 contains the following Township & No. of Folios of the 1851 Census returns for Sherbrooke County - [enumerated 12 Jan.1852]. Some townships are now in different counties and are shown in brackets: Hereford (Compton Co.) -16 Clifton (Compton Co.) - 20 Auckland (Compton Co.) - 2 Compton (Compton Co.) - 126 Orford (Sherbrooke Co.) - 46 Sherbrooke Town part of Orford - missing Sherbrooke Town part of Ascot - 112 Ascot (Sherbrooke Co.) - 60 Eaton (Compton Co.) - 68 Newport (Compton Co.) - 16 Bury (Compton Co.) - 36 Lingwick (Compton Co.) - 38 Weedon (Wolfe Co.) - 14 Melbourne (Richmond Co.) - 84 Gore of Brompton (Richmond Co.) - 32 Shipton (Richmond Co.) - 150 Winslow (Frontenac Co.) - 28 Dudswell (Wolfe Co.) - 24 West Bury (Compton Co.) - 8 Garthby (Wolfe Co.) - 8 Winslow (Frontenac Co.) - 24 Stratford (Wolfe Co.) - 8 The following are listed as "not inhabited", but I know that Stoke had 756 persons in 122 households in the 1825 census. Stoke (Richmond Co.) ; Hampton (Compton Co.) ; Ditton (Compton Co.) ; Marston; Whitton (Frontenac Co.) ; Clinton (Frontenac Co.) ; Chesham (Frontenac Co.) . This was the first 'good' census in that all family members are named and age-next-birthday, as well as country-of-birth and religious affiliation. There were 50 names to a full page/folio so there is quite a bit of information. The Agricultural portion is 1 line/household and serves as an unsorted index as well as giving Range-Lot etc info. Mat ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kathy Campbell" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, December 10, 2004 11:23 AM Subject: [QC-ETANGLO] 1851 Census Index > Is anyone familiar with this particular book? > Quebec 1851 Census: Transcription and Index. > > I saw the book advertised in Amazon.com, and it is out of print. I'm curious > what counties are included in it, as I have been told that many of the > county censuses for 1851 have been lost. > > Thank you. > Kathy Campbell

    12/10/2004 07:17:41