In a message dated 10/27/06 11:34:06 PM Central Standard Time, qc-etanglo-request@rootsweb.com writes: << From: "David J. Ellis" <DavidEllis2@verizon.net> Subject: Re: [QC-ETANGLO] Sutton location To: <qc-etanglo@rootsweb.com> Message-ID: <002c01c6f9e1$a267fe80$0201a8c0@tyranoweasel> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii I do not recall the date that the line moved, but the best approximation is to check the census records as the town and county lines moved more than once. 1825 just about everything was in "Bedford" 1831 Dunham, Stanbridge, Sutton and St. Armand were Missisquoi 1842 Dunham, Stanbridge, Sutton and St. Armand East & West were Missisquoi 1852 Dunham, Stanbridge, Sutton, Philipsburg and St. Armand East & West were Missisquoi 1861 Dunham, Stanbridge, West Farnham, Clarenceville, and St. Armand East & West were Missisquoi >> Thank you for that summary. Was Sutton never in Brome Co.? Judy

It was in Brome Co. in 1861 and think it has been in that county since that time. > -----Original Message----- > From: qc-etanglo-bounces@rootsweb.com > [mailto:qc-etanglo-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of > JStubbs100@aol.com > Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 09:06 > To: qc-etanglo@rootsweb.com > Subject: [QC-ETANGLO] Re. Sutton location > > > Thank you for that summary. Was Sutton never in Brome Co.? > Judy >