Miguel de Castro Henriques <[email protected]> wrote in Thu, 7 Jan 2010 00:46:20 +0000: [..] > Was it a forgery? (his marriage document, as Paulo contended). Well, it > seems that it was not. Let's see why. Apart from it being an obvious forgery, at least to me, it's explicitly declared at the beginning of that Sé parish book by Cabral do Nascimento that it is so, and that no certificate should be ever extracted from that record. Paulo