RootsWeb.com Mailing Lists
Total: 2/2
    1. [POWELL-DNA] Missouri Powells
    2. P.C. Powell
    3. Hello all.  Have recently returned from a brief trip to Cedar County, Missouri where I made copies of land and probate records of Green L. Powell and his father, Green D. Powell.  The heirs of Green D. Powell (1806-1860) were listed in 1866 as:  Jane, Sarah Maracle (widow), George, Green L., Elizabeth, Rebecca Caplinger, and James H. (James is stated as being in CA).  In further proceedings in 1869 the heirs are:  Jane Workman, Sarah Underhill, George W., Green L., Elizabeth Workman, Rebecca Rector (?) granddaughter, and James H. Powell who is still in CA.  Hope this helps someone.  If you want copies of what I have, send me an email.  I may be slow, but I'll get it done.  -peggy >________________________________ > From: Jim Barrett <parino@flash.net> >To: POWELL-DNA-L <POWELL-DNA-L@rootsweb.com> >Sent: Sunday, August 12, 2012 1:52 PM >Subject: [POWELL-DNA] Our Website > >Markers 26 - 67 have been added to kit 241643. >Markers 26 - 37 have been added to kit 230965. >  >Please note that kit 241643 has a value for DYS607.  This makes the checking for matches very hard.  FTDNA report no matches at 37 markers, but if you look at >http://www.familytreedna.com/public/Powell/default.aspx?section=ycolorized    you'll see he has several exact matches except for DYS607.  When FTDNA calculates the genetic distance they report his best match, in a report you can't see, as a genetic distance of 15, because 15 (the value others near him have) - 0 is 15.  We (project admins) have been told FTDNA was going to change this, but it hasn't happened yet.  Also, based on our website before this update kit 210036 was also showing a null for DYS607 but when I checked for matches I found his value to be 15.  I don't know what happened, when it happened or why it happened.  Searching the archives for this list I announced the null for 210036 on 11/21/11.  > >Jim Barrett - Timpson, TX >Powell Surname DNA Project http://jpbdna.com/powell-surname-dna-project.htm > >------------------------------- >To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to POWELL-DNA-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > >

    08/13/2012 06:59:49
    1. Re: [POWELL-DNA] Missouri Powells
    2. Jerry Powell
    3. Peggy, Do you know who the father of Green D. Powell was and what county in NC he came from? Thanks. Jerry Powell NC-16 -------------------------------------------------- From: "P.C. Powell" <peggypowell@sierrapapa.net> Sent: Monday, August 13, 2012 2:59 PM To: <powell-dna@rootsweb.com> Subject: [POWELL-DNA] Missouri Powells > Hello all. Have recently returned from a brief trip to Cedar County, > Missouri where I made copies of land and probate records of Green L. > Powell and his father, Green D. Powell. The heirs of Green D. Powell > (1806-1860) were listed in 1866 as: Jane, Sarah Maracle (widow), George, > Green L., Elizabeth, Rebecca Caplinger, and James H. (James is stated as > being in CA). In further proceedings in 1869 the heirs are: Jane > Workman, Sarah Underhill, George W., Green L., Elizabeth Workman, Rebecca > Rector (?) granddaughter, and James H. Powell who is still in CA. Hope > this helps someone. If you want copies of what I have, send me an email. > I may be slow, but I'll get it done. -peggy > > > >>________________________________ >> From: Jim Barrett <parino@flash.net> >>To: POWELL-DNA-L <POWELL-DNA-L@rootsweb.com> >>Sent: Sunday, August 12, 2012 1:52 PM >>Subject: [POWELL-DNA] Our Website >> >>Markers 26 - 67 have been added to kit 241643. >>Markers 26 - 37 have been added to kit 230965. >> >>Please note that kit 241643 has a value for DYS607. This makes the >>checking for matches very hard. FTDNA report no matches at 37 markers, >>but if you look at >>http://www.familytreedna.com/public/Powell/default.aspx?section=ycolorized >>you'll see he has several exact matches except for DYS607. When FTDNA >>calculates the genetic distance they report his best match, in a report >>you can't see, as a genetic distance of 15, because 15 (the value others >>near him have) - 0 is 15. We (project admins) have been told FTDNA was >>going to change this, but it hasn't happened yet. Also, based on our >>website before this update kit 210036 was also showing a null for DYS607 >>but when I checked for matches I found his value to be 15. I don't know >>what happened, when it happened or why it happened. Searching the >>archives for this list I announced the null for 210036 on 11/21/11. >> >>Jim Barrett - Timpson, TX >>Powell Surname DNA Project >>http://jpbdna.com/powell-surname-dna-project.htm >> >>------------------------------- >>To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >>POWELL-DNA-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the >>quotes in the subject and the body of the message >> >> >> > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > POWELL-DNA-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message

    08/15/2012 03:02:35