Wishing all of you a very Merry Christmas. Tina

The Polish Postal website does not work on my browser, for some strange reason, Opera, and Firefox - neither of them work. Weird. Anyway, I entered the Polish postal website on a another computer and it worked, i have sent them a email - in english though. I'll try and find somewhere/someone to make a Polish version for me.. Losing this document(s) was a big tease. My mood wasnt too good yesterday. I'll keep following with the Polish Post Office one way or another... Regards, Bobby.

Bobby, That sounds awful, what a bureaucratic mess! I hope you can find a way to retrieve that letter. Someone else will have to answer your main question. But I want to ask you what you mean when you say "it is not working." The url itself does seem to work fine now. If there is a problem with the website, explaining what you did that did not work (and what happened instead of what you expected) would be very helpful to enable coming up with a solution. On 12/23/08, Bobby <[email protected]> wrote: > . . . > I found what looks like the Polish postal website, but its not working > http://www.poczta-polska.pl/znaczki/en/index.php ??? > > Anyone able to tell me the website in Poland for tracking post > (registered mail), and, perhaps a contact email in the Polish Post.

Hi List, I received a registered letter to my PO box from Poland (i dont know whom or where exactly it was from), but it got sent to another PO box number, and because it wasnt collected within 30 days, it was sent back to Poland. I have phoned the post office here, and the only information they have is that it is from Poland and it was sent back. The post office in Poland should not of received the letter back yet, so i want to give them the tracking number to see if they can send it back to me when they get it. A long shot, but i'll give it a try. I found what looks like the Polish postal website, but its not working http://www.poczta-polska.pl/znaczki/en/index.php ??? Anyone able to tell me the website in Poland for tracking post (registered mail), and, perhaps a contact email in the Polish Post. I'm very, very annoyed with this, as i put in a lot of effort into my research. Even though the letter could be something that is not important, it could also be the opposite. I do not know whom it is from. Thanks. Bobby.

Thank you for this email on Surname searching. It's only been a year and a half. I'm Slow. A Ted Kowalczyk lives in Forest City PA. Very active in St John Byzantine GC Church Susquehanna St Joanie --- On Sat, 8/5/06, Tina Ellis <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Tina Ellis <[email protected]> > Subject: RE: [PBS] PBS Surnames > To: [email protected] > Date: Saturday, August 5, 2006, 7:43 AM > Carol, > I do not know what site you reached when I gave you the > link below. > Switchboard.com gives you two options. One is to view the > "listed" > telephone numbers and addresses for people in the US. They > second option is > a pay option. It is one you use to try to locate people, > who do not have > listed telephone numbers. I have been able to locate > family using both > options. I use the second one when they do not have a > listed telphone > number and/or address. > > With this site, if there is no listed telephone number, > they give you the > pay option only. Perhaps this is what happened when you > used the website. > Please go back and try it again if this is what happened to > you. > > Good luck with your search. > Tina Ellis ________________________________________ > Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 12:18:46 -0700 (PDT) > From: Carol Schmoyer <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Message-ID: > <[email protected]> > Subject: RE: [PBS] PBS Surnames > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit > > www.switchboard.com is not a free sight it brings up names > and wants you to > pay for searching is this what you were talking > about???? > ------------ > Tina Ellis <[email protected]> wrote: I used > http://www.switchboard > to find the people. It's a free sight. I'm > sure you will have fun finding possible relatives. > > Happy Hunting. > Tina -------------------------- > >From: joanie w > >Reply-To: [email protected] > >To: [email protected] > >Subject: [PBS] PBS Surnames > >Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 14:50:56 -0700 (PDT) > >I noticed your help with Kowal surnames. Can you help > me with any of the following ones? > >Bator > >Benarick > >Benorik > >Benarik > >Bednarik > >Bednarczyk > >Blazusiak > >Brzegowski > >Burka > >Goszkowski > >Goskowski > >Gorszkowski > >Janczak > >Jandura > >Jurain > >Karr > >Kopka > >Ksycki > >Lenio > >Moskal > >Mozoleski > >Para Parra > >Pluta > >Pryzybylski > >Sefchick > >Sas > >Shedlak > >Siedlak > >Siedlar > >Siedlarczyk > >Shedlock > >Strus Struss > >Str'o's > >Wielgus, Joanie > >Wielgoz ------------------------------------------ > >--- Tina Ellis > wrote: > > > Krysztof, > > > Your English is fine. This is everyone who has a listed telephone > number in Boca Raton, > >Florida: > > > Kowal, Edwin S > > > 9396 Gettysburg Rd, > > > Boca Raton, FL 33434-5531 > > > (561) 482-5443 > > > > > > Kowal, Mark > > > 8551 Dynasty Dr, > > > Boca Raton, FL 33433-6823 > > > (561) 487-3006 > > > > > > Kowal, Sara > > > 7847 Tennyson Ct, > > > Boca Raton, FL 33433-4143 > > > (561) 620-0222 > > > > > > Kowal, S L > > > 9697 Arbor Oaks Ln, > > > Boca Raton, FL 33428-1780 > > > (561) 451-1445 > > > > > > Kowal, Stuart > > > 9084 Pine Springs Dr, > > > Boca Raton, FL 33428-1455 > > > (561) 483-5843 > > > > > > Kowalczyk, Sue > > > 6503 N Military Trl, > > > Boca Raton, FL 33496-2698 > > > (561) 989-8470 > > > > > > Kowalska, A > > > 24 Mansfield A Century, > > > Boca Raton, FL 33427 > > > (561) 451-9461 > > > > > > Kowalski, Diane > > > 20248 Hacienda Ct, > > > Boca Raton, FL 33498-6601 > > > (561) 852-0524 > > > Maybe if you write to them and tell them about > your search for your family,> someone will reply. Good luck,> > > Tina Ellis ------------------------------ From: Krzysztof Stodo³a > >Reply-To: > >[email protected] To: [email protected] Subject: [PBS] Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 > 23:53:12 +0200 Hello everybody, thank`s for help and sorry > but I don`t speak english > >well. > > > >This is my grand grandfather: > > > >MATEUSZ KOWAL b. 12.09.1886r > > > >and his wife MARIA WOJCIK b. 14.02.1890r > > > >They have 5 children born in USA > > > >MARIA TEODOR CZES£AW HELENA CZES£AWA > (name`s in polish version) They have returned to Polish in 1922 but> Chester come back to USA and he live in Gary, Merrillville and last in Boca > Raton FL. Now i`m looking his son`s too. Teresa this is my family!! Please, write me > something more about them. Two doughter`s Mateusza and Mary still live in > Poland. They wait for > >message. > > > >You do not know as I am happy that. I`m > waiting for you`r message. ---------------------------------------------------- > > > >Jakie bêdzie to lato ? Sprwad¼: > >http://klik.wp.pl/?adr=http%3A%2F%2Fadv.reklama.wp.pl%2Fas%2Fh127.html&sid=817

Someone mentioned to me that there was a person on the Mazowieckie message board on Ancestry that was looking for the relatives of a Stanislaw Lipinski from Budzyno near Makow Mazowieckie. I think that I can help that person but have no idea on how to find the person looking for the Lipinski information. If anyone know who this person could be, have the searcher send me an email.

Christa, Here is the message the person wrote on the Mazowieckie message board. Click on the link and you can read it: http://boards.rootsweb.com/localities.ceeurope.poland.mazowieckie/2096/mb.ashx You can either reply to the message or click on the username, and Ancestry.com will allow you to send the person a private letter. Tina On 12/18/08, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: > > Someone mentioned to me that there was a person on the Mazowieckie message > board on Ancestry that was looking for the relatives of a Stanislaw Lipinski > from Budzyno near Makow Mazowieckie. I think that I can help that person but > have no idea on how to find the person looking for the Lipinski information. > If anyone know who this person could be, have the searcher send me an email. > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' > without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message >

There is a volume of material searching for LDS IGI transcriptions and LDS IGI batch numbers using google. http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=lds+igi+transcriptions&btnG=Google+Search&aq=f&oq= http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=lds+igi+batch+numbers&btnG=Search Some examples (partial articles): http://genealogy.about.com/b/2007/10/29/using-batch-numbers-in-the-lds-international-genealogical-index.htm So, what is a */batch number/*? Entries in the IGI come from two major sources of information: 1) individual submissions submitted by members of the LDS church and 2) information extracted by volunteers from parish records and other vital records of birth, marriage and death from around the world. Each group of records submitted is assigned a specific batch number. Records from a specific parish will generally be grouped into anywhere from one to several batches. If a batch number begins with an M (marriage) or C (christening), then it usually means the information was extracted from original parish records. It is important to understand that a "batch" doesn't always include /all/ records from the original source or even the LDS microfilm copy of the source - it may only cover a specific range of years. All parish records were not fully included as part of the official LDS extraction program. Batched records for Sapcote parish in Leicestershire, for example, include christenings from 1807-1852 and marriages from 1754-1842, while the original source microfilm references Sapcote parish registers from 1564-1875. http://www.hydeparkfhc.org/igi.php IGI -- Frequently Asked Questions What is the International Genealogical Index (IGI)? The IGI is the world's largest single miscellaneous genealogical index. It contains more than 800 million events. Each event, such as a christening, is separate from all the other items in the index; ie the database is not linked into pedigrees. Entries in the IGI come from more than 100 countries. No living people are included in the index. The IGI is not a primary source. However, it is very useful for general 'lucky dip' searching, particularly at the beginning stages of researching a family. Where did the names in the IGI come from? Entries could come from three types of sources: 1) LDS transcriptions (called 'extractions') of church records or other similar sources, 2) LDS members' family history research (called 'submissions') and 3) records of deceased members of the LDS church. The description of the source type is given under the title 'Messages'. Why does the same person sometimes appear many times? It is not uncommon for different versions of the same event for a person to be included in the IGI. This is because different researchers have added to the index over time with varying spellings, etc. How accurate is the information in the IGI? In some cases, as accurate as your nan's memory. In some cases, as accurate as professional research. In some cases, as accurate as a transcription. You should regard the IGI as a possible clue to an event, not as proof. The IGI is not a primary source. How can I correct wrong information in the IGI? As for inaccurate information in a census or parish record, mistakes in the IGI can't be corrected. Is there a link in the IGI to further information about the person I have found? No. In general, what you see is what you get. What is the difference between the internet and DOS versions of the IGI? The internet version is updated weekly while the DOS version is from 2000. The presentation format also differs. Can I mark and download IGI entries to a disk or flash drive? Yes, although there is a limit of 50 names on the internet. It is possible to download greater numbers from FamilySearch DOS. Ask a staff member. What is an extracted record? An extracted record is a partial transcription of a primary source such as a parish record. It is called an extraction because not all columns of information were recorded at the time of the transcription. For an extracted record, is it possible to see the source documentation? There are no links to images for any entry in the IGI. However, under the heading 'Source Information', you can find valuable information about the source document from which the entry came. Source Call Number -- Extractions were prepared from materials in the LDS Family History Library collection in Salt Lake City. The Source Call Number is the Family History Library catalogue reference to the source which was indexed. This is most a microfilm or fiche of the original record. In this case, the call number will be 6 or 7 digits, sometimes with an additional item number (IT) which helps to locate the records on the microfilm. The Source Call Number is underlined on an internet IGI entry, which mean that it is a link to another internet page. If you click on the Source Call Number, the Salt Lake Family History Library catalogue entry for this indexing project will be shown. If the source used was a book it may only be available in Salt Lake City. You may click on the desktop icon 'Hyde Park Inventory' on any computer to see if the source microfilm is held on site at Exhibition Road. Batch Number is the project number for the team preparing a given index. The Batch Number is not a source, but it is nonetheless useful, since it can be used to access the entire extracted index for a given project. If you click on the Batch Number, you will be returned to the FamilySearch 'Search' screen, with the Batch Number and appropriate geographical region pre-entered on the screen. If you wish to see the entire index, enter 'search' at this point. If you wish to see the index entries for a certain surname, enter the surname in the appropriate box before entering 'search'. Searching the entire index will sometimes turn up unexpected surname spelling variations. In a few cases, a Batch Number will be shown with no accompanying reference to either a Source Call Number or a Printout. These batch numbers typically start with the letter I. In such a case it is only possible to find out the Source Call Number by contacting Salt Lake City. See a member of staff. Printout number -- this is another number for the finished index. However, the index in this case is in microfilm or microfiche form. Clicking on the underlined number will give the Salt Lake Family History Library catalogue entry for the index in this form. Is there a list of the records which have been partially transcribed or extracted? There is no up to date list of parish records and other sources which have been extracted. The most recent list is called the 'Parish and Vital Records List July 1998'. An explanation of the columns is found in the question above. Remember that not all source microfilms are held at Exhibition Road. Is it possible to contact the submitter of a record submitted by a member of the LDS Church? For entries added to the IGI since 1991, no. Some IGI entries suggest that there is a source for this information, and a microfilm number may be given under Source Information. However, these entries are often 30-100 years old, so names and addresses may not be traceable. Experience has shown that it is very seldom useful to pursue this course. the cohens wrote: > Let me make sure I understand you. IGI contains both true > transcriptions and researcher data. Transcriptions are as accurate as > one can expect for transcriptions, the researcher data is, from what I > understand, what is unable to be corrected by the submitter. I do > have a copy of post somewhere from someone unhappy that they were not > allowed to correct the data they had submitted that they later learned > was not accurate. > > so people need to be clear which type of IGI data they are accessing, > I didn't know it also contains transcriptions, thanks. > > On 12/15/08, Rosemarie55 <[email protected]> wrote: > >> You are essentially correct. >> >> But, you will notice the batch numbers posted on the webpage link provided >> by Karl shows the various Parish records which have been extracted and added >> to the IGI. >> >> Any data from Batch numbers starting with C, M, K, J 'should be' correct' in >> as far as they are transcribed correctly. >> >> By clicking "Link" you will see the names on any particular Batch #, and >> then by clicking a name you will see the Film Source from which the data >> was extracted. If in doubt, order that film and check it yourself to >> verify accuracy. >> >> Rose >> > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > >

Let me make sure I understand you. IGI contains both true transcriptions and researcher data. Transcriptions are as accurate as one can expect for transcriptions, the researcher data is, from what I understand, what is unable to be corrected by the submitter. I do have a copy of post somewhere from someone unhappy that they were not allowed to correct the data they had submitted that they later learned was not accurate. so people need to be clear which type of IGI data they are accessing, I didn't know it also contains transcriptions, thanks. On 12/15/08, Rosemarie55 <[email protected]> wrote: > You are essentially correct. > > But, you will notice the batch numbers posted on the webpage link provided > by Karl shows the various Parish records which have been extracted and added > to the IGI. > > Any data from Batch numbers starting with C, M, K, J 'should be' correct' in > as far as they are transcribed correctly. > > By clicking "Link" you will see the names on any particular Batch #, and > then by clicking a name you will see the Film Source from which the data > was extracted. If in doubt, order that film and check it yourself to > verify accuracy. > > Rose

You are essentially correct. But, you will notice the batch numbers posted on the webpage link provided by Karl shows the various Parish records which have been extracted and added to the IGI. Any data from Batch numbers starting with C, M, K, J 'should be' correct' in as far as they are transcribed correctly. By clicking "Link" you will see the names on any particular Batch #, and then by clicking a name you will see the Film Source from which the data was extracted. If in doubt, order that film and check it yourself to verify accuracy. Rose From: "the cohens" If that resource is from the IGI, I have seen postings, on other lists I believe, that the IGI is a compilation of entries submitted by other researchers, and that if errors occur in their research, they cannot be corrected, even by the original researchers. So, I believe it is important that, if you find data there, cast a questioning eye on it, do not assume it is correct without doing further research, take it as a possible clue. > > On 12/4/08, Karl Roussin <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hello Tina >> To use the " Batch Numbers " to search for a person's records in >> Germany/Prussia >> Just click onto the following link >> >> http://www.igi-index.de/index.php?seite=batch8&lang=uk&sort=ort&id=aach ------------------------------ To contact the POLANDBORDERSURNAMES list administrator, send an email to [email protected] To post a message to the POLANDBORDERSURNAMES mailing list, send an email to [email protected] __________________________________________________________ To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word "unsubscribe" without the quotes in the subject and the body of the email with no additional text. End of POLANDBORDERSURNAMES Digest, Vol 3, Issue 799 ****************************************************

I found the info on your free page just what I needed, and look forward to continue my search when I get it all organized....thanks, marcy ____________________________________________________________ Love Graphic Design? Find a school near you. Click Now. http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL2241/fc/PnY6ryAdIbzYvf7wJAxra5Dg5RlpZyOoLTxDYevDDAtAYG9sKqnFT/

If that resource is from the IGI, I have seen postings, on other lists I believe, that the IGI is a compilation of entries submitted by other researchers, and that if errors occur in their research, they cannot be corrected, even by the original researchers. So, I believe it is important that, if you find data there, cast a questioning eye on it, do not assume it is correct without doing further research, take it as a possible clue. > > On 12/4/08, Karl Roussin <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hello Tina >> To use the " Batch Numbers " to search for a person's records in >> Germany/Prussia >> Just click onto the following link >> >> http://www.igi-index.de/index.php?seite=batch8&lang=uk&sort=ort&id=aach

I think not likely to be a relation, although there are some interesting coincidences. My Sarah Lillie Cohen, born 1896 in Pennsylvania, married Isadore Cooper in Northern California. Her brother, Harry Cohen, was a musician and did appear in the Silent Movies as well as on stage! But he was the only son of and only son and we are not likely to be related to your Cohens unless their surname was originally Kaplansky, from Germany or Prussia. Family name was changed to Cohen in the late 1880's. http://freepages.family.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~thecohens/cohen.html On 12/13/08, Kathryn McKee <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks - Lillie was born perhaps in Illinois in 1900. Which is interesting > because Sadie, her mother, was in NYC in 1900, so who knows if I found the > right Sadie Weiss - there were many with the same name in NYC in that > census. > > Sadie had three cousins, Sam, Jules and Jack - all of whom changed their > name to White, and produced not only the Jack White Comedies (silent films), > but the Three stooges as well - I have not had time to start to find them, > but when I do it might give me a clue about when they all came from Hungary, > and how all of them migrated to California in the early 1900's. just for > grins, these men had a niece whose married name is Charlene Cooper-Cohen, > and she lives in the San Fernando Valley. Any relation? > > It is truly a needle in a haystack, isn't it! > > Kathy McKee

Thanks - Lillie was born perhaps in Illinois in 1900. Which is interesting because Sadie, her mother, was in NYC in 1900, so who knows if I found the right Sadie Weiss - there were many with the same name in NYC in that census. Sadie had three cousins, Sam, Jules and Jack - all of whom changed their name to White, and produced not only the Jack White Comedies (silent films), but the Three stooges as well - I have not had time to start to find them, but when I do it might give me a clue about when they all came from Hungary, and how all of them migrated to California in the early 1900's. just for grins, these men had a niece whose married name is Charlene Cooper-Cohen, and she lives in the San Fernando Valley. Any relation? It is truly a needle in a haystack, isn't it! Kathy McKee ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 06:13:18 -0800 From: "the cohens" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [PBS] Schacher/Weiss To: [email protected] Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 You don't give a year of birth on Lillie. The only Ohio birth indices I found in a quick scan of Ancestry.com were for Toledo, Ohio for 1888-1895. Did not run a search there as it may not be your time frame. I don't know where you got the "born in Ohio" info, but remember that if it's from a census record, it could be wrong. Many of my family members show up with different birthplaces from census to census, and even places of birth on death certificates can be wrong if the informant gets confused, is misinformed, or just guesses. I try to get as many secondary records as I can and then compare them, and usually consider the earliest record I find to be the most accurate as there is less time for memories to get fuzzy. On 12/7/08, Kathryn McKee <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I also found my grandmother Sadie Weiss as a servant in NYC, and learned > that her eldest daughter, Lillie, was born in Ohio. The problem I have with > Lillie is I don't know her last name as she allegedly had a different father > whose name I don't know. ------------------------------ To contact the POLANDBORDERSURNAMES list administrator, send an email to [email protected] To post a message to the POLANDBORDERSURNAMES mailing list, send an email to [email protected] __________________________________________________________ To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word "unsubscribe" without the quotes in the subject and the body of the email with no additional text. End of POLANDBORDERSURNAMES Digest, Vol 3, Issue 797 ****************************************************

You don't give a year of birth on Lillie. The only Ohio birth indices I found in a quick scan of Ancestry.com were for Toledo, Ohio for 1888-1895. Did not run a search there as it may not be your time frame. I don't know where you got the "born in Ohio" info, but remember that if it's from a census record, it could be wrong. Many of my family members show up with different birthplaces from census to census, and even places of birth on death certificates can be wrong if the informant gets confused, is misinformed, or just guesses. I try to get as many secondary records as I can and then compare them, and usually consider the earliest record I find to be the most accurate as there is less time for memories to get fuzzy. On 12/7/08, Kathryn McKee <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I also found my grandmother Sadie Weiss as a servant in NYC, and learned > that her eldest daughter, Lillie, was born in Ohio. The problem I have with > Lillie is I don't know her last name as she allegedly had a different father > whose name I don't know.

Yes, I am working my way through the WW1 Draft cards on Vishnick, Wishnick, Wishnik, Wishnak, Wishnack, Wisnak, etc. as part of a surname project I'm working on. There are at least two dozen spellings or so that all have the same root sound, and I'm silly enough to want to figure out how many families all these folks really came from in the old country. There are a lot in Minnesota, and that's why that database is cool as there are lots of parent names there. I know we have more Vishnick relatives than we know about because of some family stories, and this is an outgrowth of that. But the only thing I have on the web about the project (which may take forever) is my Cherry Brandy Surnames page: http://freepages.family.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~thecohens/brandysurnames.html On 12/11/08, Julie & Kevin <[email protected]> wrote: > > Have you tried a search in Ancestry .com? > Julie B in NC > On 12/10/08, Julie & Kevin <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hello Marcy, >> This just might help give you some answers ...... >> http://people.mnhs.org/dci/Search.cfm?bhcp=1

This is so amazing! Thank you so much. It appears that Apollonia had three children born in Poland, I only knew of Stella being born there since I started the search. .I do need hi-speed now, dial-up just desn't cut it. ____________________________________________________________ Click to become an artist and quit your boring job. http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL2241/fc/PnY6rx9HhiRuZDHfL2ywjz6pTiiGCi4XM2WEor8L588uOcDKUAQ5n/

Have you tried http://www.rootsweb.com. They have some free stuff there. If you find anyone born in Poland on the SSDI, you can request a copy of their SS application. That gives us where they were born and the name of of their parents (mother's maiden name). Tina On 12/11/08, Marcy <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'm ready to give it up. I'm finding that ancestry.com has the most info, > but at a price. Family search comes up empty also. I'm thinking maybe the > settings on my computer could be at fault. I know they are in there. I use > google and found Stanislawa Wilkosz, but of course I had to get the free > trial to get the info....rafal list had numerous Wilkosz-Wozniak on the list > ____________________________________________________________ > Lose up to 20 lbs in one month with a new diet. Click here. > > http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL2241/fc/PnY6rx8hZz1DtWftSV3vdLpxZCvxfPWL2o92DINvfwjrPo33glxe1/ > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' > without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message >

I'm ready to give it up. I'm finding that ancestry.com has the most info, but at a price. Family search comes up empty also. I'm thinking maybe the settings on my computer could be at fault. I know they are in there. I use google and found Stanislawa Wilkosz, but of course I had to get the free trial to get the info....rafal list had numerous Wilkosz-Wozniak on the list ____________________________________________________________ Lose up to 20 lbs in one month with a new diet. Click here. http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL2241/fc/PnY6rx8hZz1DtWftSV3vdLpxZCvxfPWL2o92DINvfwjrPo33glxe1/

Have you tried a search in Ancestry .com? Julie B in NC -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of the cohens Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2008 9:12 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [PBS] PBS surnames Julie, Thanks for sharing that resource. It is a fantastic database that will help with my research on Wishnick surnames. On 12/10/08, Julie & Kevin <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello Marcy, > This just might help give you some answers ...... > http://people.mnhs.org/dci/Search.cfm?bhcp=1 ... put in your surname. > These are death certificates , there is some info on line , but I > think you can send for a ... ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message