Sue, Thank you for clarifying that. That just supports the old addage about assume... and I was the one who assumed. This feeds right into a next step I'd like to see taken. As we reach conclusions with these issues, I'd like to see a Family Group Sheet based file for group 10 that is uploaded to a web site. In addition to having the information properly sourced, which is a shortcoming for most information found on the internet and other publications, I'd like to see electronic images of the primary sources. The concept and technical aspects of this are quite simple. The only thing it requires is a collection of the electronic images. If any researcher doesn't have the capability to scan copies, I'm sure we can get photocopies scanned to electronic images. Steve P. "Sue H. Gill" wrote: > > Absolutely not a source from a book!!!!! I sat for several weeks going > through a microfilm of the Court Orders, most of which was written in > old English, and at first glance looks like nothing I'd ever seen > before. I got most of the information I submitted last night from that > one film. It is a true source. The one of the sons selecting a > guardian is "Surry County, Va. Court Orders 1691-1713, Page 241, May > Court, 1703". And I did make a copy of it. And I did not use all of > the old spellings, as it was for my own personal use.