Hi Folks -- I enjoy this list and I'm not usually one to be critical of format, etc., but today the subjects shown for the list got to me. I subscribe to the digest version so I get to see them all at once. Take a look: Today's Topics: {Tuesday) #1 Re: PASUSQUE-D Digest V00 #207 [Tom Walters <Tom.Walters@grc.nasa.] #2 Re: PASUSQUE-D Digest V00 #209 [BHolb9999@aol.com] #3 Re: PASUSQUE-D Digest V00 #209 [Mary Jean <maryjean@stny.rr.com>] #4 Re: PASUSQUE-D Digest V00 #207 [Mary Jean <maryjean@stny.rr.com>] #5 Re: PASUSQUE-D Digest V00 #207 [Mary Jean <maryjean@stny.rr.com>] #6 Re: PASUSQUE-D Digest V00 #209 CHA [Roger10288@cs.com] #7 RE: PASUSQUE-D Digest V00 #209 CHA [Mike Jex <mcej@dcdi.net>] Now tell me, does anyone believe that any of the 7 subjects listed above will help you in determining whether you will read this or not? Those of us who have been on these mailing lists for awhile have all seen folks that like to harp about spelling, grammar, AND putting a meaningful subject on your message. I don't see that much anymore, perhaps it's no longer important. RootsWeb archives all messages and I think the only way they can be found in by the SUBJECT. That might be important to some, but what I used to read most from the purists was "I don't have time to open every message, so if the SUBJECT doesn't interest me, I delete." Even if you are replying to a previous message, I don't see why you can't make the subject meaningful. You might wish to consider this the next time you decide to post a message, perhaps that's why you are not getting the responses you expect. That's my $0.02 worth. Regards from the humid shores of Lake Ontario, Ed