Judy, I'm of two minds. 1. The first is that there is an elder Johannes Biehn 1652-1746 buried along his wife E. Bien at Lower Skippack. They would have had a son Johannes Been who was the father of all the children. He died in 1746/7 (per will). Old Johannes then would have been being taken care of by a younger Johannes (who signs his name Johannes Bun), older Johannes would then not have left a will. Is it a coincidence that a possible father/son relationship existed but that they died at the same time? 2. Johannes Biehn 1652-1746 was married twice, first to E. Bien and second to Mary VF. Sons Henry and John (eldest and second respectively) decided to accept the land, the rest of the children did not. Were Henry and John sons of first wife (E. Bien)? Furthermore, if Henry is first son and John second, their dates cannot be b 1730 and b. abt 1722 respectively. One of the dates is wrong. I'm going to CC this to the Montgomery Co. list. Michel