I'm not sure. In earlier census' I find a young boy, who I assumed was a grandchild. In 1850 there is a boy the correct age shown, now whether or not he's the same. I've not a clue. In 1840, Henry had a male 10-15, so it really doesn't make sense that 10 years later he'd be 14. Another of life's mysteries. You just can't imagine what a mess Henry's line is in York and Berks Co. When I asked how someone "knew" something, the answer I got is that he was proven by logic. What is fact is that there were 2 Henry Riegel's in Berks Co. b ca 1759, both had different parents, but I'm sure the parents are related to each other. So I don't see the logic there. Do you flip a coin to logically decide which Henry goes where? Sorry, sour grapes. Karen