I don't understand. Why would one want to run both programs? I love this list so maybe that is a reason. You people are incredibly helpful and often just plain fun. Gaylon- Please keep the help on the list or cc to me. Maxine Hartley

Maxine: You ask, "Why?" I don't know for sure, but let me venture a guess. Ever since we gave AQ to the Church 9 years ago (so that the Church could give it to you under the name of PAF), we have been developing great new features in AQ, providing a means for PAF users to get more by using AQ. But we have found that PAF users typically feel an intense loyalty to the Church's program. So, even though AQ is very much like PAF (no pain in switching over), and it has much more to offer, still PAF users for the most part stay with PAF. We've come to realize that PAF users will continue to use PAF, and will probably use AQ as a supplemental program. Our guess is that once a user actually uses AQ for a while, he/she will probably find less of a need to go back to PAF. But meanwhile, the fact that AQ and PAF can both work on the same database makes for an easy transition. Gaylon maxinehartley wrote: > I don't understand. Why would one want to run both programs? I love this list so maybe that is a reason. You people are incredibly helpful and often just plain fun. > > Gaylon- > Please keep the help on the list or cc to me. > > Maxine Hartley > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > >