Hi, everyone: I need your help, again! I decided to print my list of "Possible Record Problems" to see where I may have made some mistakes and to correct them; to my surprise, 5 1/2 pages gave me details of my errors; about 50% of my "Possible Record Problems" says: "Was not between 16 and 45 when children were born in marriage(s)" I verified a couple of these so-called problems and so far I do not see where the problem lies;and why "16 and 45"? I am really puzzled. Exemples: RIN 11 is born in 1708, marries in 1733, has children from 1735 to 1781 (date of his death). RIN 785 is born in 1733, marries in 1781, has one child born in 1782. Do you see a problem with these dates? Thank you for your help. Lucie --------------------------------- Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your homepage.
As suggested, the problem list should be considered a warning of possible problems. They are not absolute, or PAF may actually correct them. If you are comfortable with the data, then do not sweat it. You might want to keep a record that you have already checked those datas and they are correct. Even your date prior to correction was strange, but if you can confirm it you should not worry about it. Of course, if it was a women having a child at 73, it would really raise a question. Bill > Hi, everyone: > > I need your help, again! I decided to print my list of "Possible Record Problems" to see where I may have made some mistakes and to correct them; to my surprise, 5 1/2 pages gave me details of my errors; about 50% of my "Possible Record Problems" says: "Was not between 16 and 45 when children were born in marriage(s)" I verified a couple of these so-called problems and so far I do not see where the problem lies;and why "16 and 45"? I am really puzzled. > > Exemples: > RIN 11 is born in 1708, marries in 1733, has children from 1735 to 1781 (date of his death). > RIN 785 is born in 1733, marries in 1781, has one child born in 1782. > > Do you see a problem with these dates? >
[email protected] wrote: > Hi, everyone: > > I need your help, again! I decided to print my list of "Possible Record Problems" to see where I may have made some mistakes and to correct them; to my surprise, 5 1/2 pages gave me details of my errors; about 50% of my "Possible Record Problems" says: "Was not between 16 and 45 when children were born in marriage(s)" I verified a couple of these so-called problems and so far I do not see where the problem lies;and why "16 and 45"? I am really puzzled. > > Exemples: > RIN 11 is born in 1708, marries in 1733, has children from 1735 to 1781 (date of his death). > RIN 785 is born in 1733, marries in 1781, has one child born in 1782. > > Do you see a problem with these dates? Only if either one of 'em is female. But -- it is UNUSUAL to be 48 when your first child is born and a cautious soul will double-check that and note in the NOTES the circumstances. Cheryl -- There should be no attachments on this message, unless I specifically mentioned them above.