Note: The Rootsweb Mailing Lists will be shut down on April 6, 2023. (More info)
RootsWeb.com Mailing Lists
Total: 1/1
    1. Re: [PAF-5] Question
    2. Mary Gagne
    3. Thanks to you Ross, and others who have given me their opinions. It looks like the best thing for me, then is to make them one database. Gee, I sure have lots to learn! Mary Ross G.H. Cotton wrote: > Mary > You ask about having different databases, one for you and one for your > husband. > > At my User Group meetings this question comes up often and I have yet to > find anybody that has tried it, and will recommend it. The only case I can > remember, in which it seemed acceptable, involved an elderly couple, > recently married, and with children of different spouses, and it is not > expected they will have any children of their own. > > For my case I would not recommend it. > > Ross GH Cotton, Burlington, ON, CAN 905)639-2929 > Genealogy of the Cotton surname is my Enigma > I haven't sent an attachment if the details are not mentioned above > > GOONS member responsible for tracking the family name, COTTON, #1437 > Coordinator for Cotton DNA testing Project, Worldwide > see http://home.comcast.net/~cottondna/ > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Mary Gagne" <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2008 6:18 PM > Subject: [PAF-5] Question > > > >> Is it advisable to make a separate file when working on my husband's >> family? I have one PAF, starting with me and going back on both >> parent's sides. Now I want to do the same thing with my husband in >> place "one". Separate PAFs the best way to go? >> >> Mary >> >> >> >> ------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >> [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the >> quotes in the subject and the body of the message >> > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > >

    03/29/2008 11:30:36