Thanks for the Replies. My Web site Has been working fine for all of the other Researchers for my Ancestral Line for a long long time. Something going on with Nivard. I have never had any problems. Donna ----- Original Message ----- From: "Diane" <whitehillranch@centurytel.net> To: <paf-5-users@rootsweb.com> Sent: Friday, April 08, 2011 12:04 PM Subject: Re: [PAF-5] Ancestral Quest and Web Site > Worked fine for me... Diane > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Donna Autrey" <autrey@c-zone.net> > To: <paf-5-users@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Friday, April 08, 2011 11:28 AM > Subject: Re: [PAF-5] Ancestral Quest and Web Site > > >> Hi Nivard, >> I have my basic Genealogy on PAF5.2 but also run AQ11 as it lets me >> convert >> my PAF5.2 files into AQ and then I like to make my Web Site off AQ11 as >> it >> is better than PAF5.2. That is the only reason is use it. My Front Page >> Editor (old version) works with AQ11 so that's why I use AQ11. >> Here is my Web Site http://www.BallandAutreyAncestry.com I am seriously >> thinking of uploading my Family History with all of my 1800 pictures to >> Ancestry.com so that would do away with this site. Any feed back is >> always >> welcome >> >> >> --- Original Message ----- >> From: "Nivard Ovington" <ovington1@sky.com> >> To: <paf-5-users@rootsweb.com> >> Sent: Friday, April 08, 2011 9:52 AM >> Subject: Re: [PAF-5] Ancestral Quest >> >> >>> Hi again >>> >>> A quick follow up >>> >>> I downloaded it and opened an old back up in it (it did not give a >>> convert >>> option as far as I could >>> see?) >>> >>> Anyway it opened and all looked fairly familiar >>> >>> As far as I can tell the extra bits I was interested in are only in the >>> paid version so the basic is >>> largely useless >>> >>> I don't think I will be paying out for something I don't know will help >>> me >>> >>> Thanks for the help though, appreciated >>> >>> Nivard Ovington in Cornwall (UK) >>> >>>> >>>> Hi Nivard, >>>> While I won't try to answer all of your questions I can set your mind >>>> at >>>> ease about your PAF data >>>> file. I too am a long time user of PAF. I am also a long time user of >>>> AQ. I started using PAF >>>> at version 2.0. It was a DOS program and continued to be a DOS program >>>> up through version 4. As >>>> a DOS program it used DOS printer drivers and the printed reports using >>>> a >>>> dot matrix printer were >>>> not the best. AQ was and is a windows program. It uses windows >>>> printer >>>> drivers. AQ would read >>>> my PAF 2.31 data file directly and print the reports that looked really >>>> good even on a dot matrix >>>> printer. >>>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >>> PAF-5-USERS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the >>> quotes in the subject and the body of the message >> >> >> ------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >> PAF-5-USERS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the >> quotes in the subject and the body of the message >> > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > PAF-5-USERS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Hi again, a reported attack page, means someone, sometime reported the page as a problem, and your AV accessed that record, not that your or my antivirus FOUND a problem..The only people who will get that message, is the folks using that AV. In the normal course of events, almost every page on the web gets reported for something..I admin dozens of sites, and more than dozens of email lists and boards..I spend a lot of time trying to keep those servers off blacklists because someone reported them (Rootsweb/Ancestry/Genweb) as S P A M M E R S. The big problem is anti s p a m sites keeping those bad reports around too long. It often takes days or weeks to get a site cleared after the critical number of reports are met. If my software had reported a problem, I would have emailed them asking for the report..If I owned the site, I would have had Norton review the site and tell me if it was ok, and if it was, verify and record it. (Which I just had it do with my main genealogy site). But then, that's what IBM sysprogs are expected to do... Regards, Fred

Hi again Clearly its not something specific to my computer if others are reporting the same warning So I revisited to see if it was a glitch, on the warning page there is a button "why was this web site blocked?" On clicking that you get :- Safe Browsing Advisory provided by Google Diagnostic page for ballandautreyancestry.com What is the current listing status for ballandautreyancestry.com? Site is listed as suspicious - visiting this website may harm your computer. Part of this site was listed for suspicious activity 1 time(s) over the past 90 days. What happened when Google visited this site? Of the 2 pages that we tested on the site over the past 90 days, 2 page(s) resulted in malicious software being downloaded and installed without user consent. The last time that Google visited this site was on 2011-04-08, and the last time that suspicious content was found on this site was on 2011-04-08. Malicious software is hosted on 1 domain(s), including videoonlinefree.co.cc/. This site was hosted on 1 network(s) including AS3595 (GNAXNET). Has this site acted as an intermediary resulting in further distribution of malware? Over the past 90 days, ballandautreyancestry.com did not appear to function as an intermediary for the infection of any sites. Has this site hosted malware? No, this site has not hosted malicious software over the past 90 days. How did this happen? In some cases, third parties can add malicious code to legitimate sites, which would cause us to show the warning message. Next steps: * Return to the previous page. * If you are the owner of this website, you can request a review of your site using Google Webmaster Tools. More information about the review process is available in Google's Webmaster Help Centre. Updated 3 hours ago ©2008 Google - Google Home As I said before I have never had this warning on any web site previously, so perhaps Google have been changing things? Perhaps you may want to check it out with google but it will probably clear in time Nivard Ovington in Cornwall (UK) > Thanks for the Replies. > My Web site Has been working fine for all of the other Researchers for my > Ancestral Line for a long long time. Something going on with Nivard. > I have never had any problems. > Donna