Thanks Bill for the news. I use AVAST plus Malwarebytes (professional) i have never had any complaints out of all of the researchers. Thanks for the news. Donna ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bill Buchanan" <genealogistbuchanan@gmail.com> To: <paf-5-users@rootsweb.com> Sent: Friday, April 08, 2011 11:47 AM Subject: Re: [PAF-5] Ancestral Quest and Web Site > Hi Donna, > > I just clicked the link and my security software had no problems. Maybe > Nivard's security software is giving a "false positive". (I am using AVG.) > Bill Buchanan > On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 12:39 PM, Nivard Ovington <ovington1@sky.com> > wrote: > >> Hi Donna >> >> I tried to have a look at your web site but get a "Reported Attack Page" >> >> Attack pages try to install programs that steal private information, use >> your computer to attack >> others, or damage your system >> >> Some attack pages intentionally distribute harmful software, but many are >> compromised without the >> knowledge or permission of their owners >> >> Sorry to be the bearer of bad news :-( >> >> Nivard Ovington in Cornwall (UK) >> >> >> > Hi Nivard, >> > I have my basic Genealogy on PAF5.2 but also run AQ11 as it lets me >> convert >> > my PAF5.2 files into AQ and then I like to make my Web Site off AQ11 as >> it >> > is better than PAF5.2. That is the only reason is use it. My Front >> > Page >> > Editor (old version) works with AQ11 so that's why I use AQ11. >> > Here is my Web Site >> > http://www.BallandAutreyAncestry.com<http://www.ballandautreyancestry.com/> I >> > am seriously >> > thinking of uploading my Family History with all of my 1800 pictures to >> > Ancestry.com so that would do away with this site. Any feed back is >> always >> > welcome >> >> >> ------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >> PAF-5-USERS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the >> quotes in the subject and the body of the message >> > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > PAF-5-USERS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message >

I use AVAST plus I run Malwarebytes (The whole program) Donna ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bill Buchanan" <genealogistbuchanan@gmail.com> To: <paf-5-users@rootsweb.com> Sent: Friday, April 08, 2011 11:47 AM Subject: Re: [PAF-5] Ancestral Quest and Web Site > Hi Donna, > > I just clicked the link and my security software had no problems. Maybe > Nivard's security software is giving a "false positive". (I am using AVG.) > Bill Buchanan > On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 12:39 PM, Nivard Ovington <ovington1@sky.com> > wrote: > >> Hi Donna >> >> I tried to have a look at your web site but get a "Reported Attack Page" >> >> Attack pages try to install programs that steal private information, use >> your computer to attack >> others, or damage your system >> >> Some attack pages intentionally distribute harmful software, but many are >> compromised without the >> knowledge or permission of their owners >> >> Sorry to be the bearer of bad news :-( >> >> Nivard Ovington in Cornwall (UK) >> >> >> > Hi Nivard, >> > I have my basic Genealogy on PAF5.2 but also run AQ11 as it lets me >> convert >> > my PAF5.2 files into AQ and then I like to make my Web Site off AQ11 as >> it >> > is better than PAF5.2. That is the only reason is use it. My Front >> > Page >> > Editor (old version) works with AQ11 so that's why I use AQ11. >> > Here is my Web Site >> > http://www.BallandAutreyAncestry.com<http://www.ballandautreyancestry.com/> I >> > am seriously >> > thinking of uploading my Family History with all of my 1800 pictures to >> > Ancestry.com so that would do away with this site. Any feed back is >> always >> > welcome >> >> >> ------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >> PAF-5-USERS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the >> quotes in the subject and the body of the message >> > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > PAF-5-USERS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message >

Thanks for the Replies. My Web site Has been working fine for all of the other Researchers for my Ancestral Line for a long long time. Something going on with Nivard. I have never had any problems. Donna ----- Original Message ----- From: "Diane" <whitehillranch@centurytel.net> To: <paf-5-users@rootsweb.com> Sent: Friday, April 08, 2011 12:04 PM Subject: Re: [PAF-5] Ancestral Quest and Web Site > Worked fine for me... Diane > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Donna Autrey" <autrey@c-zone.net> > To: <paf-5-users@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Friday, April 08, 2011 11:28 AM > Subject: Re: [PAF-5] Ancestral Quest and Web Site > > >> Hi Nivard, >> I have my basic Genealogy on PAF5.2 but also run AQ11 as it lets me >> convert >> my PAF5.2 files into AQ and then I like to make my Web Site off AQ11 as >> it >> is better than PAF5.2. That is the only reason is use it. My Front Page >> Editor (old version) works with AQ11 so that's why I use AQ11. >> Here is my Web Site http://www.BallandAutreyAncestry.com I am seriously >> thinking of uploading my Family History with all of my 1800 pictures to >> Ancestry.com so that would do away with this site. Any feed back is >> always >> welcome >> >> >> --- Original Message ----- >> From: "Nivard Ovington" <ovington1@sky.com> >> To: <paf-5-users@rootsweb.com> >> Sent: Friday, April 08, 2011 9:52 AM >> Subject: Re: [PAF-5] Ancestral Quest >> >> >>> Hi again >>> >>> A quick follow up >>> >>> I downloaded it and opened an old back up in it (it did not give a >>> convert >>> option as far as I could >>> see?) >>> >>> Anyway it opened and all looked fairly familiar >>> >>> As far as I can tell the extra bits I was interested in are only in the >>> paid version so the basic is >>> largely useless >>> >>> I don't think I will be paying out for something I don't know will help >>> me >>> >>> Thanks for the help though, appreciated >>> >>> Nivard Ovington in Cornwall (UK) >>> >>>> >>>> Hi Nivard, >>>> While I won't try to answer all of your questions I can set your mind >>>> at >>>> ease about your PAF data >>>> file. I too am a long time user of PAF. I am also a long time user of >>>> AQ. I started using PAF >>>> at version 2.0. It was a DOS program and continued to be a DOS program >>>> up through version 4. As >>>> a DOS program it used DOS printer drivers and the printed reports using >>>> a >>>> dot matrix printer were >>>> not the best. AQ was and is a windows program. It uses windows >>>> printer >>>> drivers. AQ would read >>>> my PAF 2.31 data file directly and print the reports that looked really >>>> good even on a dot matrix >>>> printer. >>>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >>> PAF-5-USERS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the >>> quotes in the subject and the body of the message >> >> >> ------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >> PAF-5-USERS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the >> quotes in the subject and the body of the message >> > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > PAF-5-USERS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Worked fine for me... Diane ----- Original Message ----- From: "Donna Autrey" <autrey@c-zone.net> To: <paf-5-users@rootsweb.com> Sent: Friday, April 08, 2011 11:28 AM Subject: Re: [PAF-5] Ancestral Quest and Web Site > Hi Nivard, > I have my basic Genealogy on PAF5.2 but also run AQ11 as it lets me > convert > my PAF5.2 files into AQ and then I like to make my Web Site off AQ11 as it > is better than PAF5.2. That is the only reason is use it. My Front Page > Editor (old version) works with AQ11 so that's why I use AQ11. > Here is my Web Site http://www.BallandAutreyAncestry.com I am seriously > thinking of uploading my Family History with all of my 1800 pictures to > Ancestry.com so that would do away with this site. Any feed back is > always > welcome > > > --- Original Message ----- > From: "Nivard Ovington" <ovington1@sky.com> > To: <paf-5-users@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Friday, April 08, 2011 9:52 AM > Subject: Re: [PAF-5] Ancestral Quest > > >> Hi again >> >> A quick follow up >> >> I downloaded it and opened an old back up in it (it did not give a >> convert >> option as far as I could >> see?) >> >> Anyway it opened and all looked fairly familiar >> >> As far as I can tell the extra bits I was interested in are only in the >> paid version so the basic is >> largely useless >> >> I don't think I will be paying out for something I don't know will help >> me >> >> Thanks for the help though, appreciated >> >> Nivard Ovington in Cornwall (UK) >> >>> >>> Hi Nivard, >>> While I won't try to answer all of your questions I can set your mind at >>> ease about your PAF data >>> file. I too am a long time user of PAF. I am also a long time user of >>> AQ. I started using PAF >>> at version 2.0. It was a DOS program and continued to be a DOS program >>> up through version 4. As >>> a DOS program it used DOS printer drivers and the printed reports using >>> a >>> dot matrix printer were >>> not the best. AQ was and is a windows program. It uses windows printer >>> drivers. AQ would read >>> my PAF 2.31 data file directly and print the reports that looked really >>> good even on a dot matrix >>> printer. >>> >> >> >> ------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >> PAF-5-USERS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the >> quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > PAF-5-USERS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message >

Same here. On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 11:39 AM, Nivard Ovington <ovington1@sky.com> wrote: > Hi Donna > > I tried to have a look at your web site but get a "Reported Attack Page" [snip] -- "A busily sniffing dog reading its scent version of the morning newspaper." Dawn Ackerman http://bethnewport.redbubble.com/

Hi all I have seen many posts on Ancestral Quest over time and not really paid that much attention to them as I don't have it They have now produced a free basic version I understand and whilst I am happy with most things using PAF I wonder is anything in AQ might be useful Anyone know if the basic AQ adds anything to PAF & PAF Companion ? I have looks at the comparison chart between the three PAF / Basic AQ & AQ and frankly can't make head or tail of it For example the comparison says that PAF does not have an individual record view (which it does) and also makes comparisons to something called PAF Wiz ? (never heard of it) What I do not want is for AQ basic or otherwise to alter or take over my PAF data Can I import the PAF data into AQ without changing the PAF data (I know I can make a copy of the PAF data but am just checking that AQ doesn't alter or take over any of the other back ups I have) What can AQ Basic do that PAF can't and what can AQ do more than Basic ? Just a simple idea of the differences would be most helpful I categorically do *not* want to uplift my data to the internet, if that is an automatic feature of AQ I will stop there Many thanks for any feedback Nivard Ovington in Cornwall (UK)

Hi Nivard, I have my basic Genealogy on PAF5.2 but also run AQ11 as it lets me convert my PAF5.2 files into AQ and then I like to make my Web Site off AQ11 as it is better than PAF5.2. That is the only reason is use it. My Front Page Editor (old version) works with AQ11 so that's why I use AQ11. Here is my Web Site http://www.BallandAutreyAncestry.com I am seriously thinking of uploading my Family History with all of my 1800 pictures to Ancestry.com so that would do away with this site. Any feed back is always welcome --- Original Message ----- From: "Nivard Ovington" <ovington1@sky.com> To: <paf-5-users@rootsweb.com> Sent: Friday, April 08, 2011 9:52 AM Subject: Re: [PAF-5] Ancestral Quest > Hi again > > A quick follow up > > I downloaded it and opened an old back up in it (it did not give a convert > option as far as I could > see?) > > Anyway it opened and all looked fairly familiar > > As far as I can tell the extra bits I was interested in are only in the > paid version so the basic is > largely useless > > I don't think I will be paying out for something I don't know will help me > > Thanks for the help though, appreciated > > Nivard Ovington in Cornwall (UK) > >> >> Hi Nivard, >> While I won't try to answer all of your questions I can set your mind at >> ease about your PAF data >> file. I too am a long time user of PAF. I am also a long time user of >> AQ. I started using PAF >> at version 2.0. It was a DOS program and continued to be a DOS program >> up through version 4. As >> a DOS program it used DOS printer drivers and the printed reports using a >> dot matrix printer were >> not the best. AQ was and is a windows program. It uses windows printer >> drivers. AQ would read >> my PAF 2.31 data file directly and print the reports that looked really >> good even on a dot matrix >> printer. >> > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > PAF-5-USERS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Hi Nivard, While I won't try to answer all of your questions I can set your mind at ease about your PAF data file. I too am a long time user of PAF. I am also a long time user of AQ. I started using PAF at version 2.0. It was a DOS program and continued to be a DOS program up through version 4. As a DOS program it used DOS printer drivers and the printed reports using a dot matrix printer were not the best. AQ was and is a windows program. It uses windows printer drivers. AQ would read my PAF 2.31 data file directly and print the reports that looked really good even on a dot matrix printer. Today AQ will read a PAF 5.2 data file and convert it to an AQ file without affecting your PAF 5 data file at all. Notice I said convert not import. The AQ data file is completely separate from your PAF data file. I stilll maintain both PAF and AQ on my computer. One thing I really like about AQ over the other programs available is that the reports look just like the PAF reports I am used to. One area that PAF falls short on in my opinion is it's handling of the newer temple codes. It will accept them if you type them in but it does not add them or maintain them in it's list. You have to type the code in each time. AQ maintains a current list of temple codes. AQ and PAF5 came from the same basic program code years ago and function much the same. The user interface is also similar. This reduces the learning curve if you move from PAF to another program. For your information, I ran a little test using AQ, Roots Magic, and Legacy. I used my purchased copy of AQ and the free versions of RM and Legacy so that might account for some of the test results. I used each program to download the same five generations of my pedigree from New FamilySearch and then printed out a pedigree chart. AQ was the only program.that downloaded all of my ancestors correctly. RM substituted someone who is not my ancestor for one of my ancestors. Legacy got that person right but substituted another non ancestor in a different pedigree position and did not download any one in two other pedigree positions. I did not try to do any analysis of why this happened. My advice would be to download the free version of AQ and try it. Your PAF data file is safe but as always you will want to have a current backup. For that matter download the free versions of all three programs and try them. They all have different bells and whistles. Some have so many bells and whistles it's hard to find the basics. You are the only one who can decide which you like the best if and when you may move away from PAF. I know you will ask why, if I like AQ so much, do I not change completely over from PAF. It's because of a totally separate program called GenCharts for PAF. This program is a printing utility program that reads my PAF 5 data file and prints out unique reports that I can't get from any other program. I like these reports and use them as attachments to emails to my relatives and at all sorts of family gatherings. So I maintain PAF. Besides, I'm used to it. Lynn -----Original Message----- From: Nivard Ovington <ovington1@sky.com> To: paf-5-users@rootsweb.com Sent: Fri, Apr 8, 2011 4:38 am Subject: [PAF-5] Ancestral Quest Hi all I have seen many posts on Ancestral Quest over time and not really paid that uch attention to them s I don't have it They have now produced a free basic version I understand and whilst I am happy ith most things sing PAF I wonder is anything in AQ might be useful Anyone know if the basic AQ adds anything to PAF & PAF Companion ? I have looks at the comparison chart between the three PAF / Basic AQ & AQ and rankly can't make ead or tail of it For example the comparison says that PAF does not have an individual record view which it does) and lso makes comparisons to something called PAF Wiz ? (never heard of it) What I do not want is for AQ basic or otherwise to alter or take over my PAF ata Can I import the PAF data into AQ without changing the PAF data (I know I can ake a copy of the PAF ata but am just checking that AQ doesn't alter or take over any of the other ack ups I have) What can AQ Basic do that PAF can't and what can AQ do more than Basic ? Just a simple idea of the differences would be most helpful I categorically do *not* want to uplift my data to the internet, if that is an utomatic feature of Q I will stop there Many thanks for any feedback Nivard Ovington in Cornwall (UK) ------------------------------ o unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to PAF-5-USERS-request@rootsweb.com ith the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of he message

Nivard, what Version of Ancestral Quest do you use? I am still running AQ11 and also PAF5.2 Just wondering. ----- Original Message ----- From: <lemow@email.com> To: <paf-5-users@rootsweb.com> Sent: Friday, April 08, 2011 8:06 AM Subject: Re: [PAF-5] Ancestral Quest > > Hi Nivard, > While I won't try to answer all of your questions I can set your mind at > ease about your PAF data file. I too am a long time user of PAF. I am > also a long time user of AQ. I started using PAF at version 2.0. It was > a DOS program and continued to be a DOS program up through version 4. As > a DOS program it used DOS printer drivers and the printed reports using a > dot matrix printer were not the best. AQ was and is a windows program. > It uses windows printer drivers. AQ would read my PAF 2.31 data file > directly and print the reports that looked really good even on a dot > matrix printer. > > Today AQ will read a PAF 5.2 data file and convert it to an AQ file > without affecting your PAF 5 data file at all. Notice I said convert not > import. The AQ data file is completely separate from your PAF data file. > I stilll maintain both PAF and AQ on my computer. One thing I really like > about AQ over the other programs available is that the reports look just > like the PAF reports I am used to. > > One area that PAF falls short on in my opinion is it's handling of the > newer temple codes. It will accept them if you type them in but it does > not add them or maintain them in it's list. You have to type the code in > each time. AQ maintains a current list of temple codes. > > AQ and PAF5 came from the same basic program code years ago and function > much the same. The user interface is also similar. This reduces the > learning curve if you move from PAF to another program. > > For your information, I ran a little test using AQ, Roots Magic, and > Legacy. I used my purchased copy of AQ and the free versions of RM and > Legacy so that might account for some of the test results. I used each > program to download the same five generations of my pedigree from New > FamilySearch and then printed out a pedigree chart. AQ was the only > program.that downloaded all of my ancestors correctly. RM substituted > someone who is not my ancestor for one of my ancestors. Legacy got that > person right but substituted another non ancestor in a different pedigree > position and did not download any one in two other pedigree positions. I > did not try to do any analysis of why this happened. > > My advice would be to download the free version of AQ and try it. Your > PAF data file is safe but as always you will want to have a current > backup. For that matter download the free versions of all three programs > and try them. They all have different bells and whistles. Some have so > many bells and whistles it's hard to find the basics. You are the only > one who can decide which you like the best if and when you may move away > from PAF. > > I know you will ask why, if I like AQ so much, do I not change completely > over from PAF. It's because of a totally separate program called > GenCharts for PAF. This program is a printing utility program that reads > my PAF 5 data file and prints out unique reports that I can't get from any > other program. I like these reports and use them as attachments to emails > to my relatives and at all sorts of family gatherings. So I maintain PAF. > Besides, I'm used to it. > > > Lynn > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Nivard Ovington <ovington1@sky.com> > To: paf-5-users@rootsweb.com > Sent: Fri, Apr 8, 2011 4:38 am > Subject: [PAF-5] Ancestral Quest > > > Hi all > I have seen many posts on Ancestral Quest over time and not really paid > that > uch attention to them > s I don't have it > They have now produced a free basic version I understand and whilst I am > happy > ith most things > sing PAF I wonder is anything in AQ might be useful > Anyone know if the basic AQ adds anything to PAF & PAF Companion ? > I have looks at the comparison chart between the three PAF / Basic AQ & AQ > and > rankly can't make > ead or tail of it > For example the comparison says that PAF does not have an individual > record view > which it does) and > lso makes comparisons to something called PAF Wiz ? (never heard of it) > What I do not want is for AQ basic or otherwise to alter or take over my > PAF > ata > Can I import the PAF data into AQ without changing the PAF data (I know I > can > ake a copy of the PAF > ata but am just checking that AQ doesn't alter or take over any of the > other > ack ups I have) > What can AQ Basic do that PAF can't and what can AQ do more than Basic ? > Just a simple idea of the differences would be most helpful > I categorically do *not* want to uplift my data to the internet, if that > is an > utomatic feature of > Q I will stop there > Many thanks for any feedback > Nivard Ovington in Cornwall (UK) > > ------------------------------ > o unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > PAF-5-USERS-request@rootsweb.com > ith the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body > of > he message > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > PAF-5-USERS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message

It's actually the family tree portion of new FamilySearch that non-LDS have not had access to. This file contains LDS ordinances. As it opened to non-LDS the ordinances will not be available to them. All the transcribed and scanned historical records ARE available to everyone. Dir On 4/5/2011 12:33 PM, Nivard Ovington wrote: > Hi Elaine > > No, whats being discussed here is the Temple side of new familysearch, the other, data side has been > available for some time > > The Temple part is where the LDS record their ordinances > > Nivard Ovington in Cornwall (UK) > > > >> I have been using New Family Search for a while now, and I am not LDS. I wasn't aware of doing >> anything special to get access. >> >> What is available are assorted state and Census records (some states are excellent but others >> don't >> have much yet) and international records that I have not looked at. If there are LDS specific >> sections I have not seen those. >> >> The site (or my computer) has been tempermental; sometimes it works and sometimes it freezes, and >> every so often I get a message that a script on the page is making Windows run slowly. I expect >> the bugs to be fixed before too long, and I know my slow dial-up internet doesn't help. >> >> Elaine > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to PAF-5-USERS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > -- Sue Maxwell http://granitegenealogy.blogspot.com/ Vice President - Utah Genealogical Association

Hi Elaine No, whats being discussed here is the Temple side of new familysearch, the other, data side has been available for some time The Temple part is where the LDS record their ordinances Nivard Ovington in Cornwall (UK) >I have been using New Family Search for a while now, and I am not LDS. I wasn't aware of doing > anything special to get access. > > What is available are assorted state and Census records (some states are excellent but others > don't > have much yet) and international records that I have not looked at. If there are LDS specific > sections I have not seen those. > > The site (or my computer) has been tempermental; sometimes it works and sometimes it freezes, and > every so often I get a message that a script on the page is making Windows run slowly. I expect > the bugs to be fixed before too long, and I know my slow dial-up internet doesn't help. > > Elaine

Thanks Sue for your response. I guess in time non members will know when it becomes available for them. Maureen ---- paf-5-users-request@rootsweb.com wrote: T > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re New Family Search (maureenoc) > 2. Re: Re New Family Search (Sue Maxwell) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2011 15:12:24 +1000 > From: maureenoc <maureenoc@bigpond.com> > Subject: [PAF-5] Re New Family Search > To: paf-5-users@rootsweb.com > Message-ID: <20110404051224.DG6X2.9581.root@nschwwebs05p> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > > Could someone please advise if non LDS members now have access to New Family Search records. I have just added Ancestral Quest 12.1 to my PAF5.2 software on computer. Many thanks. Maureen > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2011 23:45:25 -0600 > From: Sue Maxwell <smaxwl@earthlink.net> > Subject: Re: [PAF-5] Re New Family Search > To: paf-5-users@rootsweb.com > Message-ID: <4D995AF5.2020906@earthlink.net> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > FS has started a beta test with up to 2000 non-members. There is a > message on the discussion tabs now that says to please refrain from > discussing ordinances because non-members are now accessing nfs. > > Sue > > On 4/3/2011 11:12 PM, maureenoc wrote: > > Could someone please advise if non LDS members now have access to New Family Search records. I have just added Ancestral Quest 12.1 to my PAF5.2 software on computer. Many thanks. Maureen > > -- > Sue Maxwell > http://granitegenealogy.blogspot.com/ > Vice President - Utah Genealogical Association > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > To contact the PAF-5-USERS list administrator, send an email to > PAF-5-USERS-admin@rootsweb.com. > > To post a message to the PAF-5-USERS mailing list, send an email to PAF-5-USERS@rootsweb.com. > > __________________________________________________________ > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to PAF-5-USERS-request@rootsweb.com > with the word "unsubscribe" without the quotes in the subject and the body of the > email with no additional text. > > > End of PAF-5-USERS Digest, Vol 6, Issue 56 > ******************************************

I have been using New Family Search for a while now, and I am not LDS. I wasn't aware of doing anything special to get access. What is available are assorted state and Census records (some states are excellent but others don't have much yet) and international records that I have not looked at. If there are LDS specific sections I have not seen those. The site (or my computer) has been tempermental; sometimes it works and sometimes it freezes, and every so often I get a message that a script on the page is making Windows run slowly. I expect the bugs to be fixed before too long, and I know my slow dial-up internet doesn't help. Elaine Thanks Sue for your response. I guess in time non members will know when it becomes available for them. Maureen > Could someone please advise if non LDS members now have access to New Family Search records. I have just added Ancestral Quest 12.1 to my PAF5.2 software on computer. Many thanks. Maureen > FS has started a beta test with up to 2000 non-members. There is a > message on the discussion tabs now that says to please refrain from > discussing ordinances because non-members are now accessing nfs. > > Sue

Could someone please advise if non LDS members now have access to New Family Search records. I have just added Ancestral Quest 12.1 to my PAF5.2 software on computer. Many thanks. Maureen

FS has started a beta test with up to 2000 non-members. There is a message on the discussion tabs now that says to please refrain from discussing ordinances because non-members are now accessing nfs. Sue On 4/3/2011 11:12 PM, maureenoc wrote: > Could someone please advise if non LDS members now have access to New Family Search records. I have just added Ancestral Quest 12.1 to my PAF5.2 software on computer. Many thanks. Maureen -- Sue Maxwell http://granitegenealogy.blogspot.com/ Vice President - Utah Genealogical Association

I will give it a try Bill, Thank You for the Information. Donna ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bill Buchanan" <genealogistbuchanan@gmail.com> To: <paf-5-users@rootsweb.com> Sent: Monday, March 28, 2011 7:18 PM Subject: Re: [PAF-5] Ahnentafel Book with Photos > Donna, > > I was wrong, PAF Companion does create books in RTF that you can edit. The > photo layout is different from in PAF, you might like it better. > > Bill Buchanan > > On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 5:16 PM, Bill Buchanan < > genealogistbuchanan@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Donna, >> >> Whether I specify Right or Left for the photos they print on the Left >> side, >> outside the text margins but within the page. I tried the same thing >> using >> AncestralQuest, basically the same as PAF, but my wife's photo was >> missing >> for some reason. >> >> PAF Companion does not seem to be able to print books, just charts. >> >> I tried the free version of RootsMagic4. It can import a PAF file >> directly >> (no need for gedcom) but it would not allow me to save the report, just >> to >> print it. It didn't seem as flexible as PAF in generating reports, but it >> may be my lack of familiarity with the software. >> >> >> Bill >> >> >> On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Donna Autrey <autrey@c-zone.net> wrote: >> >>> I am not happy way PAF5.2 is performing in printing my Book into WORD97. >>> PAF5 only give me two options to place the photo Right or Left. >>> (Above, >>> Center, Below is Grayed Out). when I choose right the photo shows up >>> out >>> side the left margin in Word97. >>> >>> There must be a better program to do this in. >>> >>> I could print directly from PAF but I need to edit. >>> >>> Advice and Suggestions. I do not like the rtf format. >>> >>> ------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >>> PAF-5-USERS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the >>> quotes in the subject and the body of the message >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Bill Buchanan >> website: http://billbuchanan.byethost17.com >> blog: http://billbuchanan.blogspot.com >> >> >> > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > PAF-5-USERS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message >

Donna, I was wrong, PAF Companion does create books in RTF that you can edit. The photo layout is different from in PAF, you might like it better. Bill Buchanan On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 5:16 PM, Bill Buchanan < genealogistbuchanan@gmail.com> wrote: > Donna, > > Whether I specify Right or Left for the photos they print on the Left side, > outside the text margins but within the page. I tried the same thing using > AncestralQuest, basically the same as PAF, but my wife's photo was missing > for some reason. > > PAF Companion does not seem to be able to print books, just charts. > > I tried the free version of RootsMagic4. It can import a PAF file directly > (no need for gedcom) but it would not allow me to save the report, just to > print it. It didn't seem as flexible as PAF in generating reports, but it > may be my lack of familiarity with the software. > > > Bill > > > On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Donna Autrey <autrey@c-zone.net> wrote: > >> I am not happy way PAF5.2 is performing in printing my Book into WORD97. >> PAF5 only give me two options to place the photo Right or Left. (Above, >> Center, Below is Grayed Out). when I choose right the photo shows up out >> side the left margin in Word97. >> >> There must be a better program to do this in. >> >> I could print directly from PAF but I need to edit. >> >> Advice and Suggestions. I do not like the rtf format. >> >> ------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >> PAF-5-USERS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the >> quotes in the subject and the body of the message >> > > > > -- > > Bill Buchanan > website: http://billbuchanan.byethost17.com > blog: http://billbuchanan.blogspot.com > > >

Are you the same Teresa Rogers that went to Camden High School. vincebasile@rocketmail.com -----Original Message----- From: Teresa Rogers <sweetp84601@hotmail.com> To: PAF-5-USERS-L <PAF-5-USERS-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Thu, Mar 24, 2011 9:30 am Subject: [PAF-5] PAF-5-USERS-L@rootsweb.com PAF-5-USERS-L@rootsweb.com My wife was able to quit her job and be home with the kids http://j.mp/eU8a5e take advantage of this great opportunity to expand yourself it's so simple and it only takes a minute this truly is my secret to success financially this really is a way to expand your skills ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to PAF-5-USERS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Taking them out is a lot more difficult than not-including them. Especially when the file is too big to do a graceful global. Cheryl Bill Buchanan wrote: > Cheryl, > > I don't know whether it is possible in that way, but you should be able to > do a global search and replace in your word processor to accomplish the same > thing in the RTF file. > > e.g. in Word97, > Find:^p^p > Replace with:^p > Replace All > > Bill Buchanan > > On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 10:54 AM, singhals<singhals@erols.com> wrote: > >> OK, PAF 2 and I think 3 allowed me to do a temporary >> reconfiguration. >> >> That's not available in 5. >> >> *IF* I uninstall PAF5 and then reinstall it, can I achieve >> the same thing? >> >> Specifically, I want to eliminate *all* the blank lines in a >> book narrative; I suspect many of them are put in by the >> line-end/carriage return chr$ which can be specified in the >> config. >> >> Yes? No? Yes but a really bad idea? >> >> Cheryl

Donna Autrey wrote: > I am not happy way PAF5.2 is performing in printing my Book into WORD97. PAF5 only give me two options to place the photo Right or Left. (Above, Center, Below is Grayed Out). when I choose right the photo shows up out side the left margin in Word97. > > There must be a better program to do this in. > > I could print directly from PAF but I need to edit. > > Advice and Suggestions. I do not like the rtf format. If you don't like rtf, you'll really hate txt. GenBook outputs to wpd; GenBook cost $80 last I heard. Legacy will output to pdf, but unless you have the Adobe Acrobat full version ($300, last I checked) you can't edit it. Sorry. Cheryl