In a message dated 10/21/2000 10:01:01 AM Eastern Daylight Time, brichs@email.msn.com writes: << Hannah Cobourn married Anthony Baldwin c 1717 and died before 1729. William Cobourn will was dated in 1733, but he did not die until 1741. He would still have called Anthony son-in-law, even after his daughter's death. Margery Hannum married Anthony Baldwin in c. 1729. and died in c. 1782 John Hannum will was dated in 1730 and he died in 1730 after the marriage. This is after the marriage of his daughter. He would have called Anthony son-in-law.>> YES, Barclay!!! OF COURSE, your explanation is probably the logical one! Especially since Wm. Cobourn DOESN'T mention his Baldwin daughter's name. Wm. Cobourn is likely trying to provide for his deceased daughter's children, i.e. his grandchildren. Karen--THANKS! It appears you have a source for Anthony's marriage to Phoebe. <<Note that Hannah and Anthony married before 4th mo. 20, 1712 when Hannah was reported for marrying out of unity by Chester Monthly Meeting. She was disowned the next month.>> Can you give me the volume of Cope & the page # showing when she was disowned for mou?... One more thing. Is there proof that one or all of these 3 children Barclay lists (below) are by Margery Hannum & NOT by Phoebe Coeburn?...Barbara Anthony b. 1729 m. Mary Harlan George b. c. 1730 m. Mary ? John b. 1730 m. Mary House