Darlene (and the list), It probably would be a good idea to write directly to Roy to have him update the lineage information on the Pace DNA page so that Jesse Pace and earlier generations aren't shown as being as part of the lineage of the participants you have sponsored - but only the lineage as far back as documented be listed. That way, more isn't read into the DNA results than should be. There is a lot that can be learned from the DNA results, especially when there are mutations that occurred earlier in the lineages rather than later, but the submitted lineages should only what can be documented. There are other lineages as well that have been posted as part of the Pace DNA project based on published books and online information, rather than on documented research, and in some cases it is very obvious that they are wrong - more than one version of ancestors for the same person, the DNA results indicate the lineage is incorrect, etc. Rebecca darlene <darlene@adweb.net> wrote: Rebecca, Thank you for info on DNA I sure appreciate it..some questions,and Hypothesis an my notes in Brackets [my notes] Basic early lineages of the 3 participants (as submitted) [I was led astray by a Gedcom & Brcue Howard Book without cking results. The Gedcom said Jesse Pace Possible Husband of Mary Polly Pace so Does Bruce Howard Book, and Bruce himself told me when you see possibly does not mean it so] 1 - Jesse Pace (c1773 NC - ) [My investigation shows No Proof that this Jesse Pace is Husband of Mary Polly Pace b-1765-1775 but know that all you have to work with on DNA Results , because I believed whats in Books and on Gedcom's without doing my own cking and put it down as gospel ] 2 - Richmond Pace (1803 KY - bef Nov 1845) 3- John R. Pace (1829 - ) - descendant/DNA participant #13827 - DYS 390 = 26 [it sounds like if John Pace b-1807 which I have document that He & Richmond Pace were given care of Mary Polly Pace b-1765-1775 that appears on the 1820 Census in Harlan Co Ky and if John Pace DNA show DYS 390=26 then we could assume thier father would have DYS390=26? or if JohnPace DNA shows DYS 390=25 then we are somehow related to John Pace and Sarah Burge or Wm Pace and Secily Walker ] 3 - William Pace (1832/6 -) - descendant/DNA participant #53888 - DYS 390 = 26 2 - Simeon Pace (1812 KY - aft 1860 KY) - descendant/ DNA participant #7791 - DYS 390 = 25 <snip>