25 marker upgrade just posted on Results page for #26541. I re-organized the order of the listings to bring like results closer together; note interesting combinations in markers 6, 21, 23. I will leave it to members of those lines to sort out the meaning. http://www.pacesociety.org/DNA/results.htm Roy Johnson DNA coordinator

Is anyone out there familiar enough with DNA testing to explain what the new results for #26541 mean? I have no idea how to interpret these differences. Do they suggest he is NOT descended from the claimed Edmund Pace, presumed son of John Pace/Sarah Burgh? M.A. Causey ----- Original Message ----- From: "Roy Johnson" <royj@webster.edu> To: <PACE-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 9:23 PM Subject: [PACE-L] New results 26541 > 25 marker upgrade just posted on Results page > for #26541. I re-organized > the order of the listings to bring like results > closer together; note > interesting combinations in markers 6, 21, 23. > I will leave it to members > of those lines to sort out the meaning. > > http://www.pacesociety.org/DNA/results.htm > Roy Johnson > DNA coordinator