Oops I goofed #20864 does not Match exactly with 26541 Marker 6 shows a difference and in my brief knowledge a closer match to Donor 21419 who descends from a Edmund Pace b-1800 s/o Stephen Pace b-1757 who is supposedly a older Brother of Edmond Pace b-1764 who we think both descend from John Pace and Sarah Burge ..... I will be happy to ck out all Donor 20864 on Census and any other info I can find .. I have a lot of info Stored ...I do however need to know where to look .. I have at this point in time and for a short time ...Access to Ancestry.com, Genealogy.com, and Heritiage Quest.. and do know how to glean info from Sites where they lived I just need to know where to look or approx where, maybe it will turn up something.....If you are interested in more Documentation.. I love the search so will be happy to do it.. 1.. William Pace (1837-1862 where ? s/o 2.. Charles Pace b-abt.1810-1847 Where ? s/o 3.. Robert Pace b-abt 1785-1850 Where ? Darlene ----- Original Message ----- From: "darlene" <darlene@adweb.net> To: <PACE-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Sunday, April 09, 2006 7:45 AM Subject: Re: [PACE-L] Re: New DNA results #26541 > Mac I don't know much abt the DNA .. Roy and Rebecca and a few others are > far more into reading it .. but I like to ck out the lines by Census to see > if I agree with what the Donor claim > But I do find it strange that 26541 donor MATCHES exactly with 20864 donor > which claims another line . > I know 26541 line is straight by Census records and Descends from your > Edmond Pace I believe, I will ck out 20864 by Census and see what I come up > with ... > > I also know #21419 matches real close to your 26541 Donor Which Descends > from Stephen Pace who is brother to your Edmond Pace & Sarah Walker who we > think descend from John Pace Sarah Burge .. I have cked out 21419 by Census > and other people notes and does prove to be possibly from John Pace & Sarah > Burge ...We are at a total loss at proving forsure who Children were of > John Pace and Sarah Burge other than Burrell Pace your Edmond by Bible > records and Letters and Burrell war report .. > > I will post to Pace mailing list Census an other info I find on Donor 20864 > Darlene > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "MAC" <olems@bellsouth.net> > To: <PACE-L@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Saturday, April 08, 2006 2:58 PM > Subject: [PACE-L] Re: New DNA results #26541 > > > > Is anyone out there familiar enough with DNA > > testing to explain what the new results for #26541 > > mean? I have no idea how to interpret these > > differences. > > > > Do they suggest he is NOT descended from the > > claimed Edmund Pace, presumed son of John > > Pace/Sarah Burgh? > > > > M.A. Causey > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Roy Johnson" <royj@webster.edu> > > To: <PACE-L@rootsweb.com> > > Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 9:23 PM > > Subject: [PACE-L] New results 26541 > > > > > > > 25 marker upgrade just posted on Results page > > > for #26541. I re-organized > > > the order of the listings to bring like results > > > closer together; note > > > interesting combinations in markers 6, 21, 23. > > > I will leave it to members > > > of those lines to sort out the meaning. > > > > > > http://www.pacesociety.org/DNA/results.htm > > > > > Roy Johnson > > > DNA coordinator > > > > > > > > ==== PACE Mailing List ==== > > Be sure to check the Pace Family Genealogy Forum at > http://genforum.com/pace/ and the Pace Network at > http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~pace > > > > __________ NOD32 1.1477 (20060408) Information __________ > > > > This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. > > http://www.eset.com > > > > > > > ==== PACE Mailing List ==== > Be sure to check the Pace Family Genealogy Forum at http://genforum.com/pace/ and the Pace Network at http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~pace > > __________ NOD32 1.1478 (20060409) Information __________ > > This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. > http://www.eset.com > >