Amen. At best it's secondary evidence. Jack Pace / Williamsburg,Va. On Sat, 17 Jun 2006 16:49:19 -0500 "Nancy W. Wood" <nwwood@cox.net> writes: > A Bible record written after 1892 of an event that occurred before > 1647 > would not be considered proof, in my opinion. > > Nancy Webb Wood > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "darlene" <darlene@adweb.net> > To: <PACE-L@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 12:02 PM > Subject: Bible record of Richard Pace of Va to Bertie NC notes > George > Pace -m- Sarah Maycock > > > > I think W. James Pace bring up a valuable claim in his message > below as to > Widow of Samuel Maycock, > > > > also in Pace archives Carolyn wrote this :Sent to Pace List > Archives: > Tuesday, September 14, 1999 9:27 PM She says she wrote Colonial > Dames and > they show with absolute Certain "George Pace -m- Sarah Maycock > d/o Samuel > Maycock " at one time info was submitted and not questioned but I > think > they have cleaned up their records and make people show > Documentation. > > > > > http://listsearches.rootsweb.com/cgibin/ifetch2?/u1/textindices/P/PACE+20 02+165287479+F > > > > I also believe we go by Bible records as proof ... Right? Well > then go to > this site and you will see a Bible record showing George Pace -m- > Sarah > Maycock d/o Samuel Maycock, or are we going to question this > Richard Pace > Bible record ? > > http://ftp.rootsweb.com/pub/usgenweb/ga/bibles/p2000001.txt > > I know we all like to see the actual Document and guess one Can > get it by > Microfilm at the Georgia Archives, Drawer 91, Roll 62 > > > > My opinion we show far to many reference that George Pace -m- > Sarah > Maycock d/o Samuel Maycock, for it not to be so..... > > > > Also not too long ago someone on Pace mailing wanted some kind of > proof > the Richard Pace of Bertie Co NC was the one in Virgina this Bible > record > also note he went to Bertie Co NC > > Darlene > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: <pace3637@nc.rr.com> > > To: <PACE-L@rootsweb.com> > > Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 6:51 AM > > Subject: Re: [PACE-L] Re:Jamestown Massacre: What year did it > occur? > > > > > > > Hello: > > > You are correct Ellen; the dates do not solve the question of > which > Sarah (Sara) narried George Pace. I doubt we will ever know. But it > is hard > for me to believe that the widow would remain unmarried for all > those years > (12-14?) until young George was of marriagable age. It would not be > unusual > today, but think of how things were in that time and place. Someone > suggested that the widow returned to England for a time. Why did the > daughter remain behind living with another family? Can you picture > the widow > remainig unmarried in England and then returning to marry George? > Other > opinions are just as valid as mine, but that is all they > are-opinions. > > > Please forgive me! I promise not to clutter up the List with any > more > comments on this matter. > > > W. James Pace > > > > > > > ______________________________ > > > ==== PACE Mailing List ==== > Help this list grow - tell other Pace researchers about it. > Also, the Pace Society of America home page is located at: > http://www.pacesociety.org - check it out! > > May your every shot be long and down the middle. Jack Pace