I am trying to find the birthplace of Valentin Philip, of Rockhill, Bucks, Pa. born about 1730, probably in Wuerttemburg, Germany. I found a reference on Ancestry, year 1758, Source: Edward Hocker, from transcript at the Germantown Historical Society, information abstracted from five principal German Newspapers published in Germantown and Philadelphia 1743-1800. Is anyone familiar with this source. Would the newspapers tell the birthplace? Any help appreciated. Marjoie

It appears there were several Vasey Families in early Pennsylvania. To date, we have uncovered these lines: Joel Vasey b. ca 1793 = Hannah Pearson (Solebury, Bucks Co.) Tavern owner in Doylestown Samuel Vasey, b. 1808 = ? (Bensalem, Bucks Co.) claims father came directly from France John Vasey b. 1807 = Cordelia Price (Bustleton, Bucks Co.) Tavern owner in Phila. There is also this line: John Veasy/Vesey b. ca 1751 = Margaret McKee (Cumberland Co., 1776) So far, we have yDNA samples from both the Joel and Samuel lines: no match. We hope to have a sample from John and Cordelia's line soon. If you know of a Vasey male who would like to participate, please contact me. Thanks. Carol T.

I don't want to beat this subject to death so I promise that this is my last message on the subject. I think it's perfectly all right if people want to leave the RootsWeb/Ancestry system and set up elsewhere. Kathi posted that nice link which we have all dutifully bookmarked to help us find the GenWeb sites no matter where they are, so there's no effect on us. I remember the Maisur lists which predated RootsWeb. I'm still on a few of them. I remember that Brian and Karen had second and third mortgages on their property to buy servers to keep RootsWeb alive and that very few of us were lending financial support. Things do not remain the same forever. As far as content being taken and sold - that did happen but I seem to remember that it was FamilyTreeMaker that did it, not Ancestry. I personally think there's a risk anytime you post anything on a webpage. I am no expert on copyrights but there are a lot of resources which you can find through CyndisList.com. I don't think the sky is falling because Ancestry puts a lot of resources into genealogy. I thought that Brian's message was quite interesting and I look forward to what he comes up with - he was always the techogeek and I'm sure he's way ahead of the rest of us. Diane Diane Hettrick dhettrick@earthlink.net On Mar 15, 2008, at 4:01 PM, Helen Graves wrote: > Diane, > > According the the No Carolina state administrator, NC has left > rootsweb and > found their own serve. She posted that 29 states have left and she > named > which ones they were. Her post is all I know about this, except the > county > administrators for New York apparently were discussing what to do > today. > > I can remember when rootsweb was family owned and operated. I remember > when > it was sold to Ancestry and I remember the promise that access to > rootsweb > would always be free. > > The "Ancestry brand" you mention will be Ancestry advertising on all > USGenWeb pages. No doubt the access to the GenWeb state and county > sites > (the ones that stay with them) will be free. But what about all the > records > and databases the volunteers places on the sites? What about all the > information people have submitted to those sites under the premise that > access would be free? Won't all the volunteer work and freely donated > information instantly become an Ancestry property to do with as they > wish? > > Helen in Calif. > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Diane Hettrick" <dhettrick@earthlink.net> > To: <pabucks@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Saturday, March 15, 2008 3:30 PM > Subject: Re: [PABUCKS] RootsWeb to be Moved to Ancestry.com > > >> RootsWeb was "taken over" by Ancestry years ago when Ancestry >> purchased >> RootsWeb and kept running it exactly as it always had. If they >> hadn't, RootsWeb would be bankrupt and gone by now. The change is >> that >> the Ancestry "brand" will show on all pages hosted by >> Ancestry/RootsWeb. RootsWeb hosts (for free) the USGenWeb sites, >> which >> are a volunteer organization separate from Ancestry & RootsWeb. A few >> of the GenWeb owners are choosing to move to other locations. The >> only >> change for us is that it will be more difficult to find the sites >> which >> are moving. >> >> Diane Hettrick >> dhettrick@earthlink.net >> >> >> >> On Mar 15, 2008, at 3:27 PM, Helen Graves wrote: >> >>> I learned of this just a few days ago when the state administrator >>> for >>> North >>> Carolina on GenWeb and several NC county administrators posted what >>> is >>> happening or was about to happen, which was a takeover by >>> Ancestry.com. >>> >>> NC and 28 other volunteer state administrators with state websites on >>> USGenWeb chose not to be taken over by Ancestry.com. Instead, they >>> frantically moved their websites to different servers of their >>> choice. >>> Thus, >>> a total of 29 states have avoided being taken over by Ancestry. >>> >>> Even though the CEO of Ancestry made assurances that access to the >>> USGenWeb >>> sites would remain free; most folks think it was a business decision >>> and >>> likely that there will be an access fee in the future. >>> >>> All I know about this is based upon the postings of the USGenWeb >>> volunteers >>> for North Carolina who have sent messages to NC county mailing lists. >>> >>> New York was not on the list of states that have obtained their own >>> servers. >>> I was told there was a lot of talk today on the NYGen mailing list >>> (open >>> only to NY county administrators) so I don't know what will happen to >>> NY. >>> It sounds like if they don't make their move now, Ancestry will be >>> sweeping >>> NY under their umbrella sometime today or perhaps have already done >>> so. >>> Today was the day that the takeover by Ancestry was supposed to take >>> place. >>> >>> I can remember when Rootsweb was started by one or two people. It >>> was >>> always to be free. Then it got sold, with the promise it would >>> remain >>> free. >>> I think the "free" days for rootsweb are probably numbered. Ancestry >>> is in >>> the genealogy BUSINESS to make $$ off their subscription fees. They >>> have >>> acquired many of the "free access" websites for a reason, and I don't >>> think >>> it will be to continue offering free access. >>> >>> Helen >>> >>> >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: "Al Lenkner" <alenkner@stargate.net> >>> To: <pabucks@rootsweb.com> >>> Sent: Saturday, March 15, 2008 2:14 PM >>> Subject: [PABUCKS] RootsWeb to be Moved to Ancestry.com >>> >>> >>>> >>>> from another list: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Interesting article here: >>>> >>>> http://blog.eogn.com/eastmans_online_genealogy/2008/03/rootsweb-to- >>>> be.html >>>> >>>> See also: http?//blogs.rootsweb.com/newsroom >>>> >>>> RootsWeb to be Moved to Ancestry.com. >>>> >>>> As a more-or-less skeptic, I wonder when the other shoe will drop >>>> and RW will be either terminated or become a for-a-fee service, >>>> despite Sullivan's claims to the contrary.. >>>> >>>> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >> PABUCKS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the >> quotes in the subject and the body of the message >> >> > > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > PABUCKS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message >

They will take all information, I'm sure, that's been posted on Rootsweb and put it for sale on Ancestry and their CD's and all. It's only a matter of time. :( ----- Original Message ----- From: "Al Lenkner" <alenkner@stargate.net> To: <pabucks@rootsweb.com> Sent: Saturday, March 15, 2008 5:14 PM Subject: [PABUCKS] RootsWeb to be Moved to Ancestry.com > > from another list: > > > > Interesting article here: > > http://blog.eogn.com/eastmans_online_genealogy/2008/03/rootsweb-to-be.html > > See also: http?//blogs.rootsweb.com/newsroom > > RootsWeb to be Moved to Ancestry.com. > > As a more-or-less skeptic, I wonder when the other shoe will drop > and RW will be either terminated or become a for-a-fee service, > despite Sullivan's claims to the contrary.. > > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > PABUCKS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message

I wouldn't know, remember A-LAW beckybea@juno.com -- Andrea Guy <swpeyton@sbcglobal.net> wrote: Becky, Are there any listings for Raylman/Railman or Logan? Thank you in advance! Becky <beckybea@juno.com> wrote: Smith, Arthur, C. Bucks County Intelligencer, Marriage Notices. 1835 - 1860. Vol. II. A to Law. Bucks County Genealogical Society. 1986. Page 148 Issue Date 8/16/1848, Marriage Date 7/26/1848. FERGUSON, Franklin, late of Camden, NJ and Sarah E. Mayhew, Bridgeton, by Rev. B. Weed Issue Date 1/1/1845, Marriage Date 5/5/1844. FERGUSON, Isaac S., Philadelphia, and Anna Worthington, Bucks Co., by Rev. Richard Lewis. Issue Date 11/4/1851, Marriage Date 9/24/1851. FERGUSON, Mary Elizabeth, duaghter of Franklin, Editor of the WEst Jersey Pioneer, and Jesse C Davis, Bridgeton, by Rev. Charles E. Wilson. beckybea@juno.com _____________________________________________________________ Click to find out what your future holds. http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2121/fc/REAK6aAWchKGwX87RbjLLoE3k5uzHPawku4i9snggAYiz5oMdkGTJT/ ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to PABUCKS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to PABUCKS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message _____________________________________________________________ Take a perfect family vacation to Orlando. Click Here. http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2121/fc/Ioyw6i3nK7urfQSILL7P0xkTD2YnBEh54qrkhYBaEEExb1GjY1HMQV/

While I'm not the PABUCKS list admin and may be overstepping my bounds here ... I am the National Coordinator of a USGenWeb Special Project and would like to suggest that discussing RW-Ancestry and USGenWeb on a public, archived RW-Ancestry owned and controlled list may not be a really good idea. If anyone has questions about RW-Ancestry in relationship to USGenWeb and the data that contributors have entrusted to us, I would be happy to try to answer your concerns if you write to me off-list. Rootsweb is not being "moved" to Ancestry. Ancestry has owned Rootsweb for several years, in turn TGN (The Generations Network) owns Ancestry, My Family and Rootsweb. RW is being absorbed into Ancestry, no data is moving only a automatic redirect of urls from rootsweb to rootsweb-ancestry. Kathi Jones-Hudson, National Coordinator Tombstone Transcription Project http://www.rootsweb.com/~cemetery/index.html ____________________________________________________________________________________ Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page. http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs

USGenWeb national pages has it's own domain name so no matter what server it is housed on it can be found by going to: http://www.usgenweb.org/ or http://www.usgenweb.com/ or http://www.usgenweb.net/ If a state or special project moves to server space outside of RW-Ancestry, the new link will be added to the national pages so it should not be hard for anyone to find their favorite state/county/special project. No need to be concerned that you will have trouble finding any USGenWeb page. Kathi Jones-Hudson, National Coordinator Tombstone Transcription Project http://www.rootsweb.com/~cemetery/index.html ____________________________________________________________________________________ Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ

Helen and Diane, Here another post from the other list by the founder of Rootsweb. Al ---------- >Having signed the contract, I'm kinda aware of the details. ;) > >There was no requirement that RootsWeb stay free or persist in >perpetuity. > >On a practical level, though, we certainly expected that. The user- >provided RootsWeb content almost by definition has to stay free, >because the users can always take it elsewhere. And it's hard to >imagine Ancestry not supporting RootsWeb's functionality, because >RootsWeb is relatively inexpensive to operate and serves to grow the >customer base for Ancestry's commercial products. > > >From my perspective, there's nothing particularly good or bad about >moving RootsWeb's content inside the Ancestry domain. It clears up >some statistical difficulties associated with tracking traffic at the >two sites, at the cost of vaguely blurring the line between the free >community site and the the commercial data provider. > >On the balance, that's a yawn. > >Again from my perspective, the thing that has surprized me is how >little effort Ancestry has put into improving RootsWeb over the last >seven years. Technology has changed a lot, these days there's a whole >variety of powerful new social networking tools and such, but most of >RootsWeb has been stagnant or (arguably) has deteriorated. > >Karen and I have been kinda sitting on the sidelines for some years >now, just operating Linkpendium to stay involved. We have lately >started gathering the resources to build a next-generation site for >genealogists that fully exploits current technology. > >Stay tuned. ;) > >Cheers, B. > > >-- >Dr. Brian Leverich <leverich@linkpendium.com> >Moderator, soc.genealogy.methods/GENMTD-L >Founder, RootsWeb.com and Linkpendium.com

Hello All, I have added another 10 pages to the book "Pennsylvania Historical Society Memoirs". It is available at http://www.midatlanticarchives.com You can click on the link on the index page to jump to the start of the most recently added section. Alan RESEARCHING: Buckingham, Gilpin, Eastburn, Jeanes, Nowland, Wade, Creswell, Abernathy and related families Internal Virus Database is out-of-date. Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.518 / Virus Database: 269.21.7 - Release Date: 3/8/2008 12:00 AM

from another list: Interesting article here: http://blog.eogn.com/eastmans_online_genealogy/2008/03/rootsweb-to-be.html See also: http?//blogs.rootsweb.com/newsroom RootsWeb to be Moved to Ancestry.com. As a more-or-less skeptic, I wonder when the other shoe will drop and RW will be either terminated or become a for-a-fee service, despite Sullivan's claims to the contrary..

If anyone has a copy of the Index to Bucks County Naturalizations I would appreciate a lookup for my ancestor Johannes Keulmann/John Kileman who arrived in the county in 1852 from Germany.

Diane, According the the No Carolina state administrator, NC has left rootsweb and found their own serve. She posted that 29 states have left and she named which ones they were. Her post is all I know about this, except the county administrators for New York apparently were discussing what to do today. I can remember when rootsweb was family owned and operated. I remember when it was sold to Ancestry and I remember the promise that access to rootsweb would always be free. The "Ancestry brand" you mention will be Ancestry advertising on all USGenWeb pages. No doubt the access to the GenWeb state and county sites (the ones that stay with them) will be free. But what about all the records and databases the volunteers places on the sites? What about all the information people have submitted to those sites under the premise that access would be free? Won't all the volunteer work and freely donated information instantly become an Ancestry property to do with as they wish? Helen in Calif. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Diane Hettrick" <dhettrick@earthlink.net> To: <pabucks@rootsweb.com> Sent: Saturday, March 15, 2008 3:30 PM Subject: Re: [PABUCKS] RootsWeb to be Moved to Ancestry.com > RootsWeb was "taken over" by Ancestry years ago when Ancestry purchased > RootsWeb and kept running it exactly as it always had. If they > hadn't, RootsWeb would be bankrupt and gone by now. The change is that > the Ancestry "brand" will show on all pages hosted by > Ancestry/RootsWeb. RootsWeb hosts (for free) the USGenWeb sites, which > are a volunteer organization separate from Ancestry & RootsWeb. A few > of the GenWeb owners are choosing to move to other locations. The only > change for us is that it will be more difficult to find the sites which > are moving. > > Diane Hettrick > dhettrick@earthlink.net > > > > On Mar 15, 2008, at 3:27 PM, Helen Graves wrote: > >> I learned of this just a few days ago when the state administrator for >> North >> Carolina on GenWeb and several NC county administrators posted what is >> happening or was about to happen, which was a takeover by Ancestry.com. >> >> NC and 28 other volunteer state administrators with state websites on >> USGenWeb chose not to be taken over by Ancestry.com. Instead, they >> frantically moved their websites to different servers of their choice. >> Thus, >> a total of 29 states have avoided being taken over by Ancestry. >> >> Even though the CEO of Ancestry made assurances that access to the >> USGenWeb >> sites would remain free; most folks think it was a business decision >> and >> likely that there will be an access fee in the future. >> >> All I know about this is based upon the postings of the USGenWeb >> volunteers >> for North Carolina who have sent messages to NC county mailing lists. >> >> New York was not on the list of states that have obtained their own >> servers. >> I was told there was a lot of talk today on the NYGen mailing list >> (open >> only to NY county administrators) so I don't know what will happen to >> NY. >> It sounds like if they don't make their move now, Ancestry will be >> sweeping >> NY under their umbrella sometime today or perhaps have already done so. >> Today was the day that the takeover by Ancestry was supposed to take >> place. >> >> I can remember when Rootsweb was started by one or two people. It was >> always to be free. Then it got sold, with the promise it would remain >> free. >> I think the "free" days for rootsweb are probably numbered. Ancestry >> is in >> the genealogy BUSINESS to make $$ off their subscription fees. They >> have >> acquired many of the "free access" websites for a reason, and I don't >> think >> it will be to continue offering free access. >> >> Helen >> >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Al Lenkner" <alenkner@stargate.net> >> To: <pabucks@rootsweb.com> >> Sent: Saturday, March 15, 2008 2:14 PM >> Subject: [PABUCKS] RootsWeb to be Moved to Ancestry.com >> >> >>> >>> from another list: >>> >>> >>> >>> Interesting article here: >>> >>> http://blog.eogn.com/eastmans_online_genealogy/2008/03/rootsweb-to- >>> be.html >>> >>> See also: http?//blogs.rootsweb.com/newsroom >>> >>> RootsWeb to be Moved to Ancestry.com. >>> >>> As a more-or-less skeptic, I wonder when the other shoe will drop >>> and RW will be either terminated or become a for-a-fee service, >>> despite Sullivan's claims to the contrary.. >>> >>> > > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > PABUCKS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message > >

RootsWeb was "taken over" by Ancestry years ago when Ancestry purchased RootsWeb and kept running it exactly as it always had. If they hadn't, RootsWeb would be bankrupt and gone by now. The change is that the Ancestry "brand" will show on all pages hosted by Ancestry/RootsWeb. RootsWeb hosts (for free) the USGenWeb sites, which are a volunteer organization separate from Ancestry & RootsWeb. A few of the GenWeb owners are choosing to move to other locations. The only change for us is that it will be more difficult to find the sites which are moving. Diane Hettrick dhettrick@earthlink.net On Mar 15, 2008, at 3:27 PM, Helen Graves wrote: > I learned of this just a few days ago when the state administrator for > North > Carolina on GenWeb and several NC county administrators posted what is > happening or was about to happen, which was a takeover by Ancestry.com. > > NC and 28 other volunteer state administrators with state websites on > USGenWeb chose not to be taken over by Ancestry.com. Instead, they > frantically moved their websites to different servers of their choice. > Thus, > a total of 29 states have avoided being taken over by Ancestry. > > Even though the CEO of Ancestry made assurances that access to the > USGenWeb > sites would remain free; most folks think it was a business decision > and > likely that there will be an access fee in the future. > > All I know about this is based upon the postings of the USGenWeb > volunteers > for North Carolina who have sent messages to NC county mailing lists. > > New York was not on the list of states that have obtained their own > servers. > I was told there was a lot of talk today on the NYGen mailing list > (open > only to NY county administrators) so I don't know what will happen to > NY. > It sounds like if they don't make their move now, Ancestry will be > sweeping > NY under their umbrella sometime today or perhaps have already done so. > Today was the day that the takeover by Ancestry was supposed to take > place. > > I can remember when Rootsweb was started by one or two people. It was > always to be free. Then it got sold, with the promise it would remain > free. > I think the "free" days for rootsweb are probably numbered. Ancestry > is in > the genealogy BUSINESS to make $$ off their subscription fees. They > have > acquired many of the "free access" websites for a reason, and I don't > think > it will be to continue offering free access. > > Helen > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Al Lenkner" <alenkner@stargate.net> > To: <pabucks@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Saturday, March 15, 2008 2:14 PM > Subject: [PABUCKS] RootsWeb to be Moved to Ancestry.com > > >> >> from another list: >> >> >> >> Interesting article here: >> >> http://blog.eogn.com/eastmans_online_genealogy/2008/03/rootsweb-to- >> be.html >> >> See also: http?//blogs.rootsweb.com/newsroom >> >> RootsWeb to be Moved to Ancestry.com. >> >> As a more-or-less skeptic, I wonder when the other shoe will drop >> and RW will be either terminated or become a for-a-fee service, >> despite Sullivan's claims to the contrary.. >> >>

I learned of this just a few days ago when the state administrator for North Carolina on GenWeb and several NC county administrators posted what is happening or was about to happen, which was a takeover by Ancestry.com. NC and 28 other volunteer state administrators with state websites on USGenWeb chose not to be taken over by Ancestry.com. Instead, they frantically moved their websites to different servers of their choice. Thus, a total of 29 states have avoided being taken over by Ancestry. Even though the CEO of Ancestry made assurances that access to the USGenWeb sites would remain free; most folks think it was a business decision and likely that there will be an access fee in the future. All I know about this is based upon the postings of the USGenWeb volunteers for North Carolina who have sent messages to NC county mailing lists. New York was not on the list of states that have obtained their own servers. I was told there was a lot of talk today on the NYGen mailing list (open only to NY county administrators) so I don't know what will happen to NY. It sounds like if they don't make their move now, Ancestry will be sweeping NY under their umbrella sometime today or perhaps have already done so. Today was the day that the takeover by Ancestry was supposed to take place. I can remember when Rootsweb was started by one or two people. It was always to be free. Then it got sold, with the promise it would remain free. I think the "free" days for rootsweb are probably numbered. Ancestry is in the genealogy BUSINESS to make $$ off their subscription fees. They have acquired many of the "free access" websites for a reason, and I don't think it will be to continue offering free access. Helen ----- Original Message ----- From: "Al Lenkner" <alenkner@stargate.net> To: <pabucks@rootsweb.com> Sent: Saturday, March 15, 2008 2:14 PM Subject: [PABUCKS] RootsWeb to be Moved to Ancestry.com > > from another list: > > > > Interesting article here: > > http://blog.eogn.com/eastmans_online_genealogy/2008/03/rootsweb-to-be.html > > See also: http?//blogs.rootsweb.com/newsroom > > RootsWeb to be Moved to Ancestry.com. > > As a more-or-less skeptic, I wonder when the other shoe will drop > and RW will be either terminated or become a for-a-fee service, > despite Sullivan's claims to the contrary.. > > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > PABUCKS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message > >

I am looking for names of cemeteries in the Rock Hill (East) and Quakertown area in 1889. My gr gr grandfather, CHARLES BINNS died Feb 1889. At the time he had a farm at what is presently 5550 Clymer Rd, Quakertown. He was removed to Greenwood Cemetery in Philly in Aug 1889. I would like to find where he was originally buried to see if I could get more info re cause of death, church affiliation etc. Thanks for any help/direction you can give. Susan

Smith, Arthur, C. Bucks County Intelligencer, Marriage Notices. 1835 - 1860. Vol. II. A to Law. Bucks County Genealogical Society. 1986. Page 171 Issue date 2/23/1858, Marriage Date 2/17/1858. GEORGE, Mrs. Ann D., Philadelphia and William Hellyer, Bucks Co., in Phila., by Rev J. e. Merdedith. Issue Date 8/13/1845, Marriage Date 7/30/1845. GEORGE, Anna Jane, duagher of c., Philadelphia, and Rev. Stephen H. Mirick, of Charlottsville, VA by Rev. a. D. Gilletee Issue Date 2/15/1853, Marriage Date 1/23/1853. GEORGE, Elizabeth and Henry Angelmeyer, both of Hilltown, by Rev. J. A. Strassburger Issue Date 12/9/1851, Marriage Date 12/4/1851. GEORGE, Jacob M. and Anna Elizabeth Worman, both of Tinicum, By Rev. J. H. sherwood Issue Dte 1/31/1854, Marriage Date 1/21/1854. GEORGE, Susanna and William Hartman, both of Hilltown, by rev. J. A. Strassburger. beckybea@juno.com _____________________________________________________________ Take a perfect family vacation to Orlando. Click Here. http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2121/fc/Ioyw6i3nK7uay921PnQwSWAVoMeNhAsFW9ZhiDlRr0auShFl9Bssax/

Smith, Arthur, C. Bucks County Intelligencer, Marriage Notices. 1835 - 1860. Vol. II. A to Law. Bucks County Genealogical Society. 1986. Page 263 Issue Date 12/30/1835, Marriage Date 12/15/1835. KIRKPATRICK, D. B. of the firm of A & D. B. KIRKPATRICK, Ringoes, and Elizabeth McNair, dauther of the late Samuel, esq., Upper Makefield, By REv. P. O. Studdiford Issue Date 10/26/1836, Marriage Date 10/30/1836. KIRKPATRICK, Francis, Kensington, and Ann Hill, Hulmesville, Bucks Co., by Rev Geogre Chandler Issue Date 11/1/1843, Marriage Date 10/19/1843. KIRKPATRICK, Keziah and John P. Skelton, both of Solebury Twp., by Benjamin Powell, Esq. Issue Date 2/23/1842 Marriage Date 2/17/1842. KIRKPATRICK, Mary and Edward Neals, both of Buckingham, at McCarty's Hotel, Centreville, by Mathias Shaw, Esq. Page 264 Issue Date 7/1/1856, Marriage Date 6/28/1856. KIRKPATRICK, Mary Elizabeth and Josiah G. Riegel, both of Doylestown, in Doylestown, by Rev. S. M. Andrews beckybea@juno.com _____________________________________________________________ Free info for small business owners. Click here to find great products geared for your business. http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2121/fc/REAK6aAXlJgfPv0zbmQFI7Q1RIGCsXZFuAK7twI9T3VS5xKhQE11Rz/

Smith, Arthur, C. Bucks County Intelligencer, Marriage Notices. 1835 - 1860. Vol. II. A to Law. Bucks County Genealogical Society. 1986. Page 148 Issue Date 8/16/1848, Marriage Date 7/26/1848. FERGUSON, Franklin, late of Camden, NJ and Sarah E. Mayhew, Bridgeton, by Rev. B. Weed Issue Date 1/1/1845, Marriage Date 5/5/1844. FERGUSON, Isaac S., Philadelphia, and Anna Worthington, Bucks Co., by Rev. Richard Lewis. Issue Date 11/4/1851, Marriage Date 9/24/1851. FERGUSON, Mary Elizabeth, duaghter of Franklin, Editor of the WEst Jersey Pioneer, and Jesse C Davis, Bridgeton, by Rev. Charles E. Wilson. beckybea@juno.com _____________________________________________________________ Click to find out what your future holds. http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2121/fc/REAK6aAWchKGwX87RbjLLoE3k5uzHPawku4i9snggAYiz5oMdkGTJT/

Smith, Arthur, C. Bucks County Intelligencer, Marriage Notices. 1835 - 1860. Vol. II. A to Law. Bucks County Genealogical Society. 1986. Page 130 Issue Date 12/21/1858, Marriage Date 12/11/1858. EAGLE, Augustus, Catasauqua, Lehigh co., and Charlotte Wurster, Richland, bucks Co., by Rev. William B. Kaemmer. beckybea@juno.com _____________________________________________________________ Click here to find the satellite television package that meets your needs. http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2121/fc/Ioyw6i3mzvzd7hVEsZAzLBmqxxoMX9siqRHxZiWPEuvqqZHSUCvHXn/

Smith, Arthur, C. Bucks County Intelligencer, Marriage Notices. 1835 - 1860. Vol. II. A to Law. Bucks County Genealogical Society. 1986. Page 122 Issue date 4/28/1841, Marriage Date 4/22/1841. DODD, Davied and Mary Kenderdine, Montgomery, in Doylestown, by Rev. S. M. Andrews beckybea@juno.com _____________________________________________________________ Take a perfect family vacation to Orlando. Click Here. http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2121/fc/Ioyw6i3nK7ubC25PA75WIudU0Wc9uAj3hsZkLEkhYbn7fqXfzwFPlT/