We need to be a little careful about copying every list. Now the correction needs to go everywhere. See below. -----Original Message----- From: Mary2gard@aol.com <Mary2gard@aol.com> To: INCLAY-L@rootsweb.com <INCLAY-L@rootsweb.com> Date: Tuesday, April 18, 2000 7:19 PM Subject: Fwd: More accurate information about the Ohio Bill > >--part1_ce.43613b0.262e4750_boundary >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > > >--part1_ce.43613b0.262e4750_boundary >Content-Type: message/rfc822 >Content-Disposition: inline > >Return-Path: <jillaine@benton.org> >Received: from rly-za04.mx.aol.com (rly-za04.mail.aol.com [172.31.36.100]) > by air-za05.mail.aol.com (v70.20) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Apr 2000 > 18:00:29 -0400 >Received: from exchange.benton.org (wx5.benton.org [216.200.81.5]) by > rly-za04.mx.aol.com (v71.10) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Apr 2000 18:00:14 > -0400 >Received: by wx5.benton.org with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) > id <J1J2SWFG>; Tue, 18 Apr 2000 18:08:14 -0400 >Message-ID: <377AFDDED85BD3118095009027A8F38D4BE884@wx5.benton.org> >From: "Smith, Jillaine" <jillaine@benton.org> >To: "'nyerie-L@rootsweb.com'" <nyerie-L@rootsweb.com> >Cc: "'cen07407@centurytel.net'" <cen07407@centurytel.net> >Subject: More accurate information about the Ohio Bill >Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2000 18:08:08 -0400 >MIME-Version: 1.0 >X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) >Content-Type: text/plain; > charset="iso-8859-1" >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > >I'm happy to report that my earlier rant of today generated a very quick >response from the Ohio Genealogical Society that contained more accurate >information. Thanks to Nancy Stone of OGS for responding so quickly. It >looks like an amendment has been proposed to remove the language restricting >access to maiden names. For those concerned about this issue, here's more >complete information from Nancy, below. > >-- Jillaine Smith, Washington DC > >-----Original Message----- >From: Nancy Stone [mailto:cen07407@centurytel.net] >Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2000 6:58 PM >To: Smith, Jillaine >Subject: Re: [NYERIE] Fw: [OBITL] Fwd: Ohio Bill > >Hello Jilliane, > >This is a direct reply to you questioning the Ohio House Bill 519-Mother's >Maiden Name. I am a member of the Ohio Genealogical Society and received >this notice in the January 2000 Newsletter, Volume XXX1, Number 1, Page 1. >Editor: Sundra Anderson Peters. E-mail: ogs@ogs.org > >Quoting the article dated January 2000: > >"State Representative Bryan C. Williams, Republican, of Akron, introduced >House Bill 519 on 14 Dec 1999, which should be of concern to Ohio >genealogists. If the reader has access to the Internet, go to The 123rd Ohio >General Assembly Online http://www.legislature.state.oh.us/ and in the >current legislation box, click on "House," type in bill number "519," and >click go. The proposed bill to amend section 3101.05 and enact section >3101.051 of the Ohio Revised code may then be printed out." > >>From the Ohio Genealogical Society Newsletter Volume XXXI, Number 3, Page >32, dated March 2000 come the following quote: > >"UPDATE ON HOUSE BILL 519 > >Senator Dick Schafrath has written to inform me that an amendment to H.B. >519 was to be offered in Committee (House Civil and Commercial Law) on >January 26, 2000, retracting the provision that removes the mother's maiden >name from the marriage certificate. The web site information has not yet >been changed. We will continue to monitor this issue. >Sundra Peters, Editor" > >I hope this helps many to understand this issue. The original poster should >have added sources for their information. > >Sincerely, > >Nancy Stone >Michigan > >--part1_ce.43613b0.262e4750_boundary-- > > >==== INCLAY Mailing List ==== >This list brought to you by Rootsweb,be sure to check us out at >http://www.rootsweb.com/ >