Hi, Jim --- Glad you're up and around again. Must have been rough. My votes: #1 Orlando #2 Viriginia Uh, how are you going to weight the votes? Equally (count 'em all, 1st and 2nds, and may the best man, uh, place win)? That my penalize folks who only voted once. Weight the first vote with something like a factor of, say, 1.5? Sorry to pick nits. In fact, I'll be happy to go along with whatever method you choose, especially if it makes one of my choices win. ;-) Hope you're well quick. John -----Original Message----- From: James O'Neall <[email protected]> To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Date: samedi 14 novembre 1998 21:47 Subject: [ONEALL-L] Result of Poll >Well I am Still among the living, although there was a time yesterday that I >was willing to give up the ghost. I was not able to "pass" my very respectable >stone and so early in the dead dark a.m. yesterday I relented to go in to the >Hospital. They could not to the new fangled shockwave thing because the >machine was down so had to do the old fashioned "let's just fish around up >there and see if we can get it" way. Well they did, and what I envisioned as >being this giant boulder was barely visible to the naked eye. Well I am on the >road to "all better", once I get enough nerve to pull the stint out on Monday >Morning, which I am supposed to do myself. > >Her are the results of the poll: > >total of 34 voting:- > >in favor of a clan gathering = 34 >would be able to attend = 29 >would assist in the planning = 17 > >The four top locations were: - > >Salt Lake City = 5 >South Carolina = 6 >Virginia = 5 >Orlando FL = 5 > >What I would suggest now is that we all vote for two of the four locations and >label them #1 and #2 >Then I will tally that and get back to you and then the 17 who want to help >with the planning will need to get our corporate heads together and come up >with all the right answers. > > > >Jim O'Neall >[email protected] >"Searching the past; Looking to the future" > > >