But then, looking at it again, it could be Cocke Oops, Martyn ath <higham@clara.net> wrote: Hi all ~ On my behalf, Judith has kindly uploaded an excerpt from a 1660 deposition to........ http://homepages.rootsweb.com/~oel/unsolved36.html I'd be grateful for help on the surname that appears (twice) in line 3. Many thanks Anne H. in Epping, England ==== OLD-ENGLISH Mailing List ==== OLD-ENGLISH Web Page http://homepages.rootsweb.com/~oel/
It looks like YORKE to me. Pam Stoke on Trent ath <higham@clara.net> wrote: Hi all ~ On my behalf, Judith has kindly uploaded an excerpt from a 1660 deposition to........ http://homepages.rootsweb.com/~oel/unsolved36.html I'd be grateful for help on the surname that appears (twice) in line 3. Many thanks Anne H. in Epping, England ==== OLD-ENGLISH Mailing List ==== OLD-ENGLISH Web Page http://homepages.rootsweb.com/~oel/ ==== OLD-ENGLISH Mailing List ==== OLD-ENGLISH Web Page http://homepages.rootsweb.com/~oel/
I also think it is Cocke. Liz in Melbourne
I would say it was definitely Yorke. Mary >