Dear Debbie I suppose it's a case of hope for the best then - all we can do. Audrey ----- Original Message ----- From: <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, November 06, 2006 11:05 AM Subject: Re: [OEL] John Overholt > > Audrey > > I'm pretty certain that John would not have published anything on the web. > I > know there are lots of sites about Holcombe Rogus and the Bluetts, most of > which probably have a lot of inaccurate information. I don't have a > particular interest in the Bluetts so I don't need any information for > myself. I was > only really thinking about the difficulties which might be faced by Bluett > researchers in the future. Unless anyone else in John's family takes an > interest > then it won't be possible to access John's research or any of the family > papers. > > Debbie > > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.1.409 / Virus Database: 268.13.27/517 - Release Date: > 03/11/2006 > >
For Pete's sake! This conversation should have been taken off list a long time ago. It has nothing to do with the subject matter of this list. Judith Werner Salt Lake City, Utah, USA Administrator, OLD-ENGLISH http://homepages.rootsweb.com/~oel/ | Dear Debbie | | I suppose it's a case of hope for the best then - all we can do. | | Audrey | | > | > I'm pretty certain that John would not have published anything on the web. | > I | > know there are lots of sites about Holcombe Rogus and the Bluetts, most of | > which probably have a lot of inaccurate information. I don't have a | > particular interest in the Bluetts so I don't need any information for | > myself. I was | > only really thinking about the difficulties which might be faced by Bluett | > researchers in the future. Unless anyone else in John's family takes an | > interest | > then it won't be possible to access John's research or any of the family | > papers. | >