RootsWeb.com Mailing Lists
Total: 1/1
    1. Re: [OK-IT-L] Need input 4 OKGenWeb CC standards
    2. David W. Morgan
    3. On Fri, 29 May 1998, Marti Graham wrote: > Hi group :) > > On the heels of the message about missing cc's, we need to set a standard > in our state concerning missing cc's and placing their counties for > adoption. The following has been suggested - input and opinions please. > > > Maybe there should be a standing rule about absentee's from the OKGenWeb. > > If a county coordinator cannot be reached within 30 days, then the rule > > would be that the county would be put up for adoption. > > IMHO, 30 days is sufficient for a cc to contact either myself or Megan and > let us know they are experiencing a problem. My thinking is - three > messages [sent weekly] to the cc that go unanswered should be followed up > by a phone call the fourth week IF there is still have no response. IF no > contact can be made with reasonable effort, then the county should be > placed for adoption. > > Next thought - if the cc makes contact after the county has been placed for > adoption and the county has been adopted that county remains with the new > cc. > > - anyone - thoughts or opinions? > It all sounds good to me. dmorgan@efn.org --- David W. Morgan --- Honolulu Hawaii Barber Family ---- http://members.xoom.com/barberfamily/ OKGenWeb -- http://www.rootsweb.com/~okcotton/cotton.htm OKGenWeb -- http://www.rootsweb.com/~okjeffer/index.html OKGenWeb --- http://www.rootsweb.com/~okjohnst/index.htm OKGenWeb --- http://www.rootsweb.com/~okmurray/index.htm Email Congress http://www.efn.org/~dmorgan/congress.html

    05/29/1998 09:41:59