I agree with the reasonable effort to contact the cc. I also think that the cc should let Marti or Megan know when they expect to be away for some period of time. I believe this to be a courtesy that only takes less than five minutes to accomplish and would eliminate any hard feelings from a cc that comes back to find that their web page is with someone else. I also would agree that when it is adopted then it is adopted, period. Harold D. Massey St. Louis, MO hmassey@primary.net Marti Graham wrote: > Hi group :) > > On the heels of the message about missing cc's, we need to set a standard > in our state concerning missing cc's and placing their counties for > adoption. The following has been suggested - input and opinions please. > > > Maybe there should be a standing rule about absentee's from the OKGenWeb. > > If a county coordinator cannot be reached within 30 days, then the rule > > would be that the county would be put up for adoption. > > IMHO, 30 days is sufficient for a cc to contact either myself or Megan and > let us know they are experiencing a problem. My thinking is - three > messages [sent weekly] to the cc that go unanswered should be followed up > by a phone call the fourth week IF there is still have no response. IF no > contact can be made with reasonable effort, then the county should be > placed for adoption. > > Next thought - if the cc makes contact after the county has been placed for > adoption and the county has been adopted that county remains with the new > cc. > > - anyone - thoughts or opinions? > > Marti