LOL I am working on the Stacys my head was already spinning!! so there is a generation missing <G> where are those probate records. You are going to have to hope Ancestry hold another book <>G I am still mining the Shepard book <G> Eliz On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 9:28 PM, Debbie Noland Nitsche<[email protected]> wrote: > Hummm... Interesting!  "IF" the age of Elizabeth Woodmancy (Woodmansee) was > correct in the 1850 census as 78 yrs. old, she would of been born about > 1771. > > If Joseph Woodmansee died in 1813 at the age of 60 yrs. old, he would of > been born about the year of  1753. > > That would make Joseph about 18 yrs. older than Elizabeth (Betsey). > > Talk about robbing the cradle.  But not unusual back in those days. > > But...this Mary E. (Woodmansee) Angle, Harriet and Martha Woodmansee > (spelled Woodmancy) could not possibly be the children of Joseph and > Elizabeth.  According to the 1850 census, Mary E. Angle was born abt. 1833; > Harriet born abt. 1838;  and Martha born about 1846.   With knowing this, > they must be Joseph and Elizabeth's grandchildren, with the father dying > between 1846 & 1850. > > Correct? > > Oh boy!!!  I can just see Eliz's head spinning again.  ha ha > > > > Debbie Noland Nitsche > [email protected]