--part1_4f.29d85bf.262de810_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Listers ! Just thought this was important enough to send on to our Researchers who may have family who passed through Ohio. Also, we do not want other States taking this same attitude on the records in their State. This sometimes is the only clue to that maiden name Pat --part1_4f.29d85bf.262de810_boundary Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Return-Path: <GEN-UNSOLVED-MYSTERIES-L-request@rootsweb.com> Received: from rly-za02.mx.aol.com (rly-za02.mail.aol.com [172.31.36.98]) by air-za02.mail.aol.com (v70.20) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Apr 2000 11:56:43 -0400 Received: from bl-11.rootsweb.com (bl-11.rootsweb.com [209.85.6.27]) by rly-za02.mx.aol.com (v71.10) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Apr 2000 11:56:31 -0400 Received: (from slist@localhost) by bl-11.rootsweb.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id IAA26838; Tue, 18 Apr 2000 08:54:14 -0700 (PDT) Resent-Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2000 08:54:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-Sender: PeggyLynnRowe@aol.com Tue Apr 18 08:54:10 2000 From: PeggyLynnRowe@aol.com Message-ID: <33.3e7fd39.262ddf01@aol.com> Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2000 11:53:37 EDT Subject: Ohio Bill closing records Old-To: zuelsdorf@cybertime.net, OHLICKIN-L@rootsweb.com, GEN-UNSOLVED-MYSTERIES-L@rootsweb.com, COX-L@rootsweb.com, cookie@clover.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: AOL 5.0 for Windows sub 105 Resent-Message-ID: <rQ_dSC.A.AjG.lUI_4@bl-11.rootsweb.com> To: GEN-UNSOLVED-MYSTERIES-L@rootsweb.com Resent-From: GEN-UNSOLVED-MYSTERIES-L@rootsweb.com Reply-To: GEN-UNSOLVED-MYSTERIES-L@rootsweb.com X-Mailing-List: <GEN-UNSOLVED-MYSTERIES-L@rootsweb.com> archive/latest/1475 X-Loop: GEN-UNSOLVED-MYSTERIES-L@rootsweb.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: GEN-UNSOLVED-MYSTERIES-L-request@rootsweb.com Passing this {bad} news on from the Jefferson Co,Ohio list. > Hello list members searching Ohio records for marriage information: > This comes from the April 2000 Mahoning County Chapter of the OGS > newsletter: "Introduced into the Ohio House of Rep. is a bill to amend > the > Ohio Revised code that should have genealogists up in arms. 'It states, > in > part, that upon receiving a request for records pertaining to the > issuance of > marriage licenses, a probate court shall furnish copies of the records as > > provided under section 149.43 of the Ohio Revised code, except that the > court > shall delete or otherwise remove any social security numbers and the > maiden > names of the mothers of the parties to a marriage so that they are not > available to the person requesting the records, except for use by the > department of human services, law enforcement personnel, and if ordered > by > the court in a civil or criminal trial.' If any individual genealogist > feels > that this would impact their ability to do genealogical research, a > letter > voicing your concern would be in order here. The address is: The > Honorable____, Ohio Representatives, 77 South High St., Columbus, Ohio > 43266-0603. Or www.house.state.oh.us/voice/index. html. Representative > Ron > Hood from Canfield is a co-sponsor of this bill." > Pass this on to any other lists you are subscribed to if you think > others > might also be seeking marriage information in Ohio records. > > Barbara Faig > Tennessee > >> > >Thought this might be of interest to anyone that is researching in Ohio. > > >Hello list members searching Ohio records for marriage information: > This comes from the April 2000 Mahoning County Chapter of the OGS >newsletter: "Introduced into the Ohio House of Rep. is a bill to amend >the >Ohio Revised code that should have genealogists up in arms. 'It states, >in >part, that upon receiving a request for records pertaining to the >issuance of >marriage licenses, a probate court shall furnish copies of the records as > >provided under section 149.43 of the Ohio Revised code, except that the >court >shall delete or otherwise remove any social security numbers and the >maiden >names of the mothers of the parties to a marriage so that they are not >available to the person requesting the records, except for use by the >department of human services, law enforcement personnel, and if ordered >by >the court in a civil or criminal trial.' If any individual genealogist >feels >that this would impact their ability to do genealogical research, a >letter >voicing your concern would be in order here. The address is: The >Honorable____, Ohio Representatives, 77 South High St., Columbus, Ohio >43266-0603. Or www.house.state.oh.us/voice/index. html. Representative >Ron >Hood from Canfield is a co-sponsor of this bill." > Pass this on to any other lists you are subscribed to if you think >others >might also be seeking marriage information in Ohio records. > >Barbara Faig >Tennessee > > --part1_4f.29d85bf.262de810_boundary--