RootsWeb.com Mailing Lists
Total: 1/1
    1. Re: [NYGENESE] Identifying Pictures
    2. Linda/Don
    3. > I think I have a stupid question but here goes Sharon- no, it's not a stupid question (there are no stupid questions.....)--in fact, I think it's a timely question, as there must be many people with such questions on their minds(but are too timid to ask!-so, thanks to you on behalf of them!) >on the census I put Sharon LaDue Null Kessler I would say it's personal preference-- how you feel about it all- on photos, I'd probably put Sharon LaDue (Null) Kessler..... that may make it clearer to descendants- at least to me, it would show LaDue as your maiden name, Null as a surname for a first marriage, and Kessler as your name at the time of the photo. It could also clear the way for the Null name on any other photos of children, and any other family members--nieces, etc. : )Linda ----- Original Message ----- From: <SHARONKESSLER@cs.com> To: <NYGENESE-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Sunday, October 20, 2002 12:35 PM Subject: [NYGENESE] Identifying Pictures > Hi List > > I think I have a stupid question but here goes. I want to put names on the > backs of all my pictures. Have my acid free pens and know not to write on the > back of the faces.My question is this > On my pictures before marriage I would put Sharon LaDue > On my pictures during first marrage would I put Sharon LaDue Null > On my pictures during my 2nd marriage would I put Sharon LaDue Kessler > I do not want someone in 100 years from now to have pictures with no names > like I have some of. Don't laugh on the census I put Sharon LaDue Null > Kessler, want everyone one to find me in Louisiana.....Thanks for you > help....Sharon

    10/21/2002 12:42:56