Actually Vivian, anyone who I've invited to my tree can see the pictures just fine. I know I've marked that living people are not to be seen, but I assumed that meant that those gone would be! I'll have to get in touch with Ancestry, in the meantime, I'll just play around with it and maybe stumble on the answer. Thanks to everyone who offered advice! Judy ---- Vivian Kessler <vivian.kessler@gmail.com> wrote: > Judy, > > I have two cousins with public trees on ancestry.com and their pictures show > up okay. Maybe it depends on whether you have set your tree as public or > private? Also is this other user someone that you invited to your tree or > just someone who tried the tree without being invited? I'm not sure if that > makes a difference also. > > Vivian > > > On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 10:59 AM, <1.judyh@fuse.net> wrote: > > > I obviously need some help from any of you Ancestry.com experts! > > > > I have some 83 pictures on my Ancestry.com tree, but recently had someone > > tell me that there are no pictures that she could access. Since I work at > > the public library, I too signed in as a general user and could not pull up > > any of my pic's. Surnames: HOLLWEG, BRIODY, HATFIELD [of Somerset, KY & > > Cinti, OH)] > > > > Might there be a setting of some kind that I didn't set properly or any > > suggestions you might have? > > > > Thanks, > > Judy-Cinti ( > > ___________________________________ > > > > The Bklyn Info Pages Website: > > www.bklyn-genealogy-info.com/ > > > > List Administrator: NancyL916@aol.com > > > > Post to List: nybrooklyn@rootsweb.com > > ___________________________________ > > ------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > > NYBROOKLYN-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > > quotes in the subject and the body of the message > >