Hi Judie:The record index is available at my local fhc, (the index only includesthe name of the groom). In addition my local fhc has a copy of a research doc done by a couple of LDS scholars in 2006.That doc includes both bride and grooms name, so I know I have the right couple since the cert #'s match upMy grandfather immigrated to NYC from Unterheimbach Wuert. in 1881 at the age of 23.He married my grandmother in Ohio in1900. On that marriage doc he stated that he was a widower. My (late) dad said he had a wife and daughter in NYC. The wife's maiden name was Steinle. Something happened and both wife and daughter died. And then he moved to Ohio. I contacted a member of the Steinle family who lived near my grandparents in Ohio and inquired if they had a female Steinle who married my grandfather in NYC.He sent me a copy of the 1895 wedding photo of the couple. HOWEVER, they must have divorced or ??? since she didn't die 'til 1945 --2 years after my grandfather. I'm guessing my grandmother didn't know abt wife #2 ( a very brief marriage) I think I discovered a family secret.Shirley---------- Original Message ---------- From: Judie Cook <[email protected]> To: "Shirley Hulett" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [BKLYN] Questions :1895 Brooklyn marriage cert Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2012 00:36:57 -0400 Have you been to your local LDS church to get them to order it for you....then you go back and view it. If you're lucky, they'll make a copy of whatever comes up on the screen. Might be worth a phone call... luck... Judie On Aug 6, 2012, at 12:25 AM, Shirley Hulett wrote: > Hi Judie...Thanks for sharing your ideas, Most anything is worth a try... > A grand niece of the bride who lives in Salt Lake was supposed to track > track down the marriage doc at the Salt Lake Library...but so far, I don't > think she's made if off the couch! > Shirley > > ---------- Original Message ---------- > From: Judie Cook <[email protected]> > To: "Shirley Hulett" <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [BKLYN] Questions :1895 Brooklyn marriage cert > Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2012 22:08:47 -0400 > > So sorry....thought maybe it might work. > > Judie > On Aug 5, 2012, at 10:02 PM, Shirley Hulett wrote: > > > Hi Judie.. > > Yes, I'm well aware of the 1990 census.However, by that year, my > > grandfather was on his second or third marriage. The age at first marriage recorded in > > the census is several years younger than he was in the marriage record prior to my grandmother... > > and the background of the bride does match with the tragic story my father was told. > > ---------- Original Message ---------- > > From: Judie Cook <[email protected]> > > To: "Shirley Hulett" <[email protected]> > > Subject: Re: [BKLYN] Questions :1895 Brooklyn marriage cert > > Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2012 19:44:50 -0400 > > > > If you look at the census (1900, 1910) etc, under the column "marriage, divorced, single", etc, the often will put a number next to Married...or years married. That number says which marriage this is.... > > Good luck > > Judie Cook > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > On Aug 5, 2012, at 7:20 PM, Shirley Hulett wrote: > > > > > HiI'm hoping someone on this list can tell me what information In might findon an 1895 Brooklyn marriage application/license/certificate.(not sure theLDS correct term) Kings County NY Marriage recordGroom: Haas Karl --Bride: Christiana Dorothea SteinleMarrige date: Nov 28 1895Kings 5776 H200 > > > Cert. no. 5301-6530 Sep-Dec 1895 - FHL US/CAN Film [ 1562039 Among the details I'm hoping to learn is if this were mygrandfather's first or second marriage. Woujld this info be on an1895 Brooklyn marriage cert?In advance, ThanksShirley in San Diego > > > ____________________________________________________________ > > > Woman is 53 But Looks 25 > > > Mom reveals 1 simple wrinkle trick that has angered doctors... > > > http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3131/501efff75ef17ff63b72st03vuc > > > > > > ------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > >