Irene - Too much? I don't think so - as always you hit the nails right on their heads. You very clearly described my frustrations. I cannot verify anything prior to Andrew S. - and by the way, I competely agree with you about the Sickles (Suckles, Sciecles, etc etc) I came to the same conclusion - simply because the names during that era do seem to be repeated with a consistency that evades their spelling proficiency. Although I keep poking around, I think it's going to take some on-site research - and I'm trying to enlist my sister, who lives in Sussex County NJ to help me out. Hard to do from California. But do let me know if you find anything more on that line. Amazing how well documented the southern Norwoods are - and how undocumented the mid-Atlantic ones are! The most exciting stuff I have found has been the well-documented burials in the Marble Cemetery - and the church information on the Ogilvies. I have more information on them than the early Norwoods! Anyway, thanks for your info as always - keep up the good work - you're doing a lot better at this than I am! Lynne ----- Original Message ----- From: "icefox" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, August 27, 2000 8:55 AM Subject: Re: A breakthrough on my Norwoods in NJ > ************ > Source: [email protected] > Subject: Re: A breakthrough on my Norwoods in NJ > > > 'Scuse me, hate to be too nosey, but which Andrew Norwood is that - > what year and where? > > Lynne > ************ > > > Hi Lynne! > > For some reason your message didn't show up for me on the mailing list > but luckily I got it through a PML search. > > > Note: I've tried to number the Andrew's in this post to make it > easier to follow which one is which, but honestly I can't tell if it > helped the matter or made it worse. Suffice to say there are so many > Andrew Norwoods (and Richard's for that matter) in this line they're > hard to tell apart. > > > The Andrew Norwood [1] I'm referring to was b. in 1703 in NYC, NY and > d. in 1787 in New Brunswick, Middlesex Co, NJ (I have some conflicting > evidence on location of death currently but I won't confuse the issue > with that right now. It'll be up on the web site next month.) He was > m. to Hannah (Vance?) and they had seven known children, John, Tobias, > Andrew [2], Catherine, Cornelia, Hannah, and Mary. > > If I remember correctly, you're looking for info on the Andrew G. [4] > Norwood b. 1812, d. 1879, that m. Mary Floyd Tallmadge in 1836. His > *supposed* parents were Andrew S. Norwood [3] and Rebecca Oglivie. > I've seen no source documentation for that so I can't verify it. I've > seen Andrew S. [3] Norwood's birthdate on the LDS website put at Sept > 11, 1770. *If* that's true, again I have no source documentation, > then that would make Andrew S. [3] Norwood the son of Tobias Norwood, > the son of the Andrew Norwood [1] I was referring to originally. > > So far, the only interesting evidence I have to support this linage is > Andrew S. [3] Norwood's middle name. I've seen that S. spelled in at > least a half dozen ways so I can't quite figure out which one is > correct. But I have a theory. Mind you it's only a theory. I think > that S. might actually stand for Sickels (or Sickles) which is the > last name of Andrew's [3] Aunt Mary, sister to Andrew's [3] father > Tobias if this linage is correct as stated. > > However, the interesting thing is that this theory also supports > another possibility, that is, that Andrew S. [3] is the son of Andrew > [2], instead of his brother, Tobias. That Andrew [2] I believe m. > Mary Legget and the fact that Andrew S. [3] names his daughter Mary > could mean that said daughter was named after her paternal grandmother > instead of her own mother. > > > Ugh. That was probably more info than you really wanted. :) > > Hope this helps! > > Irene > http://homepages.rootsweb.com/~norwood/ >