I'm sure you will agree Brian that the quantity of information in BTs, compared to that in the original register, varies greatly between parishes. It's always worth looking at the original entry, no matter how complete the BTs, as they are a prime source, and BTs are - by definition - secondary. Ruth 2010/1/7 Brian Pears <bp@bpears.org.uk> > Ruth Appleby wrote: > > The BTs of Norton are available on the LDS Labs Pilot Site. It gives no > > further information that the IGI but does confirm the names and date as > you > > already have it. The original register may have a little more. > > Ruth/Midred > > It's very unlikely that the original register has information > which is not on the BT - but it's not impossible. > > Brian > -- > Brian Pears (Gateshead, UK) http://www.bpears.org.uk/ > Joint List Admin NORTHUMBRIA Genealogy Mailing List > GENUKI Northumberland Maintainer > > > The NORTHUMBRIA FAQ page is located at > http://www.bpears.org.uk/NorthumbriaFAQ/ > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > NORTHUMBRIA-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message >