The 1881 is absolutely wrong and you did wonderfully well to find them , I had spent a hot afternoon trying and failing but this is them as Correll and Stoker , goodness me ........that is well out of order but not Ancestry`s fault for once , but the original enumerator . Did you track them back to the 1871 when Robert should be about 2 ....and Lewis about 6 ...... life is hard . soften it with a cat \\\=^..^=/// ----- Original Message ----- From: "xpn11" <xpn11@aol.com> To: <norfolk@rootsweb.com> Sent: Sunday, July 31, 2011 4:21 PM Subject: Re: [NFK] FARROW Lewis > John The 1881 has them at 5029/109/11 under Stoker not Stokes and Louis > and Robert as Correll not Farrow but living at the right place. Birth > place for the Norfolk members is Knapton. > Ancestry has a member tree which seems to have Harriet and her > children as Pycraft/Farrow > FBMD 1863 Harriet Farrow to Charles Pycraft > The 1871 -4737/45/29 has a possible match for a Charles Pycraft and > Harriet plus a Lewis and a Robert amongst the children. This is at > Allerton Bywater near Leeds so some distance from the Durham village > The tree on Ancestry may be a bit creative but the Knapton birthplace > is a good lead. There may have been two Harriet Farrows, cousins > perhaps-or she may have moved further north with a new miner husband. Or > married three times. Did not find a death for Charles Pycraft/Pycroft. > If it is accurate they have Lewis emigrating to the USA > have fun cross checking and eliminating-- the Ancestry tree doesn't look > to include Family Search Knapton PRs as a source. > Rosie > > On 30/07/2011 18:12, John E Farrow wrote: >> Hi >> >> I have come across a family in the 1891 census RG12/4125/66/15 in >> Chester-l-Street district >> >> James STOKES 43, Carlisle >> Harriet STOKES 44, Norfolk >> Margaret Ann STOKES 19, Heworth Dur >> William STOKES 16, Heworth >> Robert FARROW 22 step-s, Norfolk >> Lewis FARROW 26 step-s, Norfolk >> Louisa FARROW 25 wife of step-s, Woolwich >> James FARROW 4 son of step-s, Wardley Colliery Dur >> Harriet FARROW 2 dau of step-s, Wardley Colliery Dur >> Frederick FARROW 3mth son of step-s, Whickham Dur >> >> Has anyone come across the above Norfolk FARROW names ? – I am most >> frustrated that I cannot find them in 1901 or earlier census returns nor >> can I track the step-son relationship, presumably via Harriet as either >> her natural sons or a 1st marriage to a FARROW, nor where Lewis later >> vanished to !! >> >> Regards >> John E Farrow >> >> ------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >> NORFOLK-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the >> quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > NORFOLK-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message