I am satisfied that Sir Charles dates are correct, but I am trying to confirm the others. There are several trees showing the same dates, but they all seem to have got them from another tree. I cannot discover where the original source of the dates etc. is. Richard In a message dated 20/12/2011 10:14:52 GMT Standard Time, atgn@elder53.plus.com writes: are dates correct ----- Original Message ----- From: <Treetopsfarm@aol.com> To: <norfolk@rootsweb.com> Sent: Monday, December 19, 2011 8:48 PM Subject: [NFK] Help with a Harbord > Hi all, > > I have a Hugh Harbord, possibly as follows:- (1854-1721), Norfolk, son > of > William "The Somerset" Harbord, who was born either 1620 or some > documents > say 1635 in Norfolk. He was the son of Sir Charles harbord born Wraxall > Somerset in1596; died Marshfield, Glocs. in 1679. I cannot find > corroberative documentation for Hugh's dates, nor the death of William, > and evidence of > Hugh's marriage or children, other than other trees. > Hugh is supposed to have married Sara Coman and had issue William > (1682-1744) in Stratton Strawless, Norfolk. > > This is the problem of copying anyone else'e tree! > > > Richard > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > NORFOLK-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message > ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to NORFOLK-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

so this is correct? have a Hugh Harbord, possibly as follows:- (1854-1721), Norfolk ----- Original Message ----- From: <Treetopsfarm@aol.com> To: <norfolk@rootsweb.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2011 10:45 AM Subject: Re: [NFK] Help with a Harbord >I am satisfied that Sir Charles dates are correct, but I am trying to > confirm the others. There are several trees showing the same dates, but > they > all seem to have got them from another tree. I cannot discover where the > original source of the dates etc. is. > > Richard > > > In a message dated 20/12/2011 10:14:52 GMT Standard Time, > atgn@elder53.plus.com writes: > > are dates correct > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <Treetopsfarm@aol.com> > To: <norfolk@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Monday, December 19, 2011 8:48 PM > Subject: [NFK] Help with a Harbord > > >> Hi all, >> >> I have a Hugh Harbord, possibly as follows:- (1854-1721), Norfolk, son >> of >> William "The Somerset" Harbord, who was born either 1620 or some >> documents >> say 1635 in Norfolk. He was the son of Sir Charles harbord born Wraxall >> Somerset in1596; died Marshfield, Glocs. in 1679. I cannot find >> corroberative documentation for Hugh's dates, nor the death of William, >> and evidence of >> Hugh's marriage or children, other than other trees. >> Hugh is supposed to have married Sara Coman and had issue William >> (1682-1744) in Stratton Strawless, Norfolk. >> >> This is the problem of copying anyone else'e tree! >> >> >> Richard >> >> ------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >> NORFOLK-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the >> quotes in the subject and the body of the message >> > > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > NORFOLK-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and > the body of the message > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > NORFOLK-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message >

There is a 1721 death of a Hugh Harbor in Buxton - copy of original PR sent off list. The Prs for Stratton Strawless are online at Family Search but no Harbord baps 1682 -95 HTH Jean 20 December 2011 10:45, <Treetopsfarm@aol.com> wrote: > I am satisfied that Sir Charles dates are correct, but I am trying to > confirm the others. There are several trees showing the same dates, but > they > all seem to have got them from another tree. I cannot discover where the > original source of the dates etc. is. > > Richard > > > > >