-----Original Message----- From: Jeanne Geake [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 7:54 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: Sharp, Pedrick, Mattson >At 06:23 PM 9/2/2003 -0700, Malcolm Sharp wrote: >>Same holds true for 1860 [and any census] -- county of birth not taken. >You're mistaken. I've got a picture of the page 9 of City of Salem, Salem >Co. 1860 census in front of me now and it gives Eli Sharp's place of birth >as Burlington Co. and it gives county of birth for everyone on the page who >as born in NJ. I just looked at another page in the City of Salem in 1860 >nd it also gives county of birth for those born in NJ. > >Jeanne Do you know if Charles S. Lawson was the only enumerator in 1860 (or ever) to not follow directions for listing place of birth? mss

At 08:47 PM 9/2/2003 -0700, Malcolm Sharp wrote: >Do you know if Charles S. Lawson was the only enumerator in 1860 (or ever) >to not follow directions for listing place of birth? He wasn't. In Frankford, Sussex Co., NJ in 1850, the county of birth is given. I'm sure there are probably others also. This is just another I know about. Jeanne