Sandy wrote: > Many of the lists have archives. I don't know if this list does or not. > Perhaps someone could respond to that?? > > I am on a Mack/Mock list and the Archives are the best part. Every msg is > held so that it is available for furture use by newcomers to the list. The > "threads" are kept together too. Posting info to a web site is great but > does not completely cover the ground the way an archived version of the > posts would. > > I have so much stuff to post on my web site that I gave up coding line by > line. Throw it into a table format and let WORD do it itself. Just add > the "header" and "footer" and bingo! One more web page for the road. ================================ I will check into the archives possibility. Although I agree that message threads are best kept to a mailing list and having them archived; the postings of directory information have not sparked any "threads." What if we were to pursue both avenues?--archiving and having a URL The URL can have a link to the archives. I can certainly understand about not having enough time; but I suppose that I am such a control freak that I still endeavor to handcraft my HTML. I certainly did not meant to denigrate any HTML editor nor anyone who uses one. Life is be far too short and too hectic at times -- so much of what is out there that provides convenience and can save us all some time is welcome. Rory http://www.erols.com/emcrcc/RGen.htm