I have no connection to Ancestry.com and only subscribe every so often But; In your example the only thing that they have an obligation to correct is the transcription error # 3. It would be nice if they dual index #1, As far as your grandmother's name - that is the name that was given to the census taker. Please have pity on volunteer transcribers, especially those who transcribe from the 16 and 1700's. Those records were written with a feather quill by a person who wrote what they heard. A lot of the time the only way a transcriber knows the name is if they know what the name should be. There is also the question on how to transcribe a f when the modern spelling is s, the same for l and r. Bill Boscia -----Original Message----- From: Jacqueline Lubinski Sent: Sunday, April 01, 2012 9:45 AM To: 'BMacKie' ; njhunter@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [NJHUNTER] Newspaper Deaths in 1895 - Indexed as 1894! I found that out with my very first search years ago! My grandfather's name is spelled Gonzol but pronounced Gernzel in phonetic Hungarian. Ancestry.com has the family in the 1920 census as Guernsey, my grandmother's name is listed as Mary (nor Borbala), and my mom is listed as Serena instead of Irene. There are 3 errors here in this family alone. The first two are due to the census taker, and the 3rd (my mom's name) is because the transcriber to Ancestry.com read Irene as Serena and that is how she is listed in their database. I made corrections to their files. In doing Ancestry searches one has to really "think outside the box". Sometimes it is not as easy as WDYTYA on tv portrays it to be. -----Original Message----- From: njhunter-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:njhunter-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of BMacKie Sent: Sunday, April 01, 2012 6:17 AM To: njhunter@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [NJHUNTER] Newspaper Deaths in 1895 - Indexed as 1894! Mr. Bill (I love that)....I suggest that nearly all information on Ancestry.com is questionable from the getgo and should never be taken for granted. This is not a criticism, it is merely an observance over a twenty year period of time. ________________________________ From: Mr. Bill Hartman <mrbill1033@comcast.net> To: NJHUNTER <njhunter@rootsweb.com> Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2012 9:12 PM Subject: [NJHUNTER] Newspaper Deaths in 1895 - Indexed as 1894! To change the current DNA hoopla, read on! I have discovered that nearly all the Deaths reported in the Hunterdon Republican newspaper that occurred from January 1, 1895 until June 30, 1895 were recorded as '1894' in the Listings on Ancestry.com. This was seen in nearly 200 deaths and they occurred not only from deaths in Hunterdon County, but also other New Jersey Counties. It is my opinion that the error is most likely due to the indexer who read the microfilm of the originals and typed the wrong year. This opinion needs to be verified by someone who has access to the original data, since the implication would mean that hundreds of deaths in the time period noted above are suspect. I will contact Ancestry.com and tell them my findings, which you may see by going to the Hunterdon Republican Website, see below Regards, MrBill Hunterdon Republican newspaper, visit: http://www.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~njhrna/ Visit the Hunterdon County GenWeb page at: http://www.rootsweb.com/~njhunter ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to NJHUNTER-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message Visit the Hunterdon County GenWeb page at: http://www.rootsweb.com/~njhunter ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to NJHUNTER-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message Visit the Hunterdon County GenWeb page at: http://www.rootsweb.com/~njhunter ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to NJHUNTER-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message