Note: The Rootsweb Mailing Lists will be shut down on April 6, 2023. (More info)
RootsWeb.com Mailing Lists
Total: 1/1
    1. [NJGLOUCE-L] Fw: TAKE A PEEK
    2. Alice Geier
    3. >HI > >I have been watching these two pages for quite awhile now and enjoy >everyone on these mailing list. I also belong to > [email protected] I want all of you to take a look at the table of >contents. I also volunteer for this site along with a multitude of other >volunteers. I had no idea that I could contribute just by typing and then >e-mailing my finished work to Joyce the keeper of our web page as I am NOT >computer literate and don't understand why computers work anyway. However; >I see some of you put information out that probably could assigned to our >web pages permanently. It just has to be out of copyright. Other things >you may have in your collection like old newspaper obituaries, wills etc. >Maybe the keepers of Camden and Gloucester would be willing to do this. I >don't know as I don't know how involved it is and everyone only has so much >time in a day anyway, so maybe there is a volunteer out there that knows all >this and could help out our webpage keepers. Just a thought. > >Check out the Delaware County web page, go into the table of contents. You >will not believe what the volunteers have done. It is awesome. > >Researching: CALDWELL, MARPLE, SULLIVAN, PORCH AND PRICE > >ALICE >NC > > > > > >-----Original Message----- >From: jim gaw <[email protected]> >To: [email protected] <[email protected]> >Date: Thursday, June 10, 1999 11:47 PM >Subject: Re: [NJCAMDEN-L] PROWELL on HERITAGE! Richard and Joseph! > > >>You are talking about two different Heritage's. Your discription >indicates >>that this Heritage family was in Burlington County. >>Jim, Lurking in Tucson, AZ. >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Vincent Edward Summers <[email protected]> >>To: [email protected] <[email protected]> >>Date: Thursday, June 10, 1999 19:57 >>Subject: [NJCAMDEN-L] PROWELL on HERITAGE! Richard and Joseph! >> >> >>>Here is my little contribution to the HERITAGE input for tonight. I >>>never thought to look up that name. You will enjoy this from p. 724 >>>of George Reeser rowell's History of Camden County NJ 1886... >>> >>> Richard Heritage was one of the proprietors of the town of Gloucester >>>when it was laid out, in 1686. He owned lots in the original town, and >>>was one of the signers of the memorandum made by the proprietors as to >>>the division of lots. He was the first who bore the name in West >>>Jersey, and came from Warwickshire, England. He purchased rights of >>>Edward Byllinge and his trustees in 1684, and made a location of land on >>>the north side of Pensaukin Creek, in Burlington County, and called the >>>place "Hatten New Garden." He purchased other rights and located other >>>lands in this township. He died in 1702, without a will, and most of >>>his land passed to his heir-at-law, his eldest son, John. In 1705 he >>>sold to William Matlack one thousand acres of land in Waterford >>>township. John married Sarah Slocum in 1706. To his son Joseph he >>>conveyed considerable land. Much of this land he sold. It lay on both >>>sides of the creek and now embraces several valuable farms. Samuel >>>Burrough purchased a art of this tract in 1698. Joseph Heritage died >>>in 1756, leaving six children.--Richard, who married Sarah Whitall and >>>Sarah Tindall; Joseph, who married Ruth Haines; Benjamin, who married >>>Keziah matlack; John, who married Sarah Hugg; mary, who married John >>>Gill and John Thorne; and Hannah, who married Mr. Rogers. >>> It was from Joseph Heritage and his children that many of the early >>>settlers purchased land, and, although the family apears to have been >>>a large one, yet the name is now unknown among the residents of the >>>township, although some remain within the present limits of Waterford >>>township and still hold a small portion of the land. >>> >>> >>> >>>A couple of notes here, folks... First, the two paragraphs above are >>>from the chapter entitled "THE TOWNSHSIP OF DELAWARE." >>> >>>Second, it seems likely to me that Richard was not the son of Joseph, >>>but of John. It was John who was the father of Joseph, according to >>>this article. What are your comments on this? >>> >>>Vince >>> >> >> >

    06/13/1999 02:30:31