Hi , I have spent the better part of the morning going through a 1856 & 1857 marriage index film at the LDS. On these films i have found the husbands but no cross reference record of the wife. I have looked under there maiden names, first names various spellings. Is it possible for there to be only one name on the index? If this is not the case does anyone have any ideas on how Mary Jane Mitchell could also have been put under? and Jane Macauley? Any advice would be greatly appreciated as I don't want to spend money on a copy of the certificates if its wrong. Many thanks Robyn New Zealand

Mitchell doesn't have many variations other than the Mitchel with one 'l' . As for Macauley - try M'Cauley and M'Acauley Jane http://www.from-ireland.net/contents/londerryconts.htm ----- Original Message ----- From: "Robyn Paterson" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, May 02, 2003 12:41 AM Subject: [Derry] MARRIAGE RECORDS > Hi , > I have spent the better part of the morning going through a 1856 & 1857 > marriage index film at the LDS. > > On these films i have found the husbands but no cross reference record of > the wife. > I have looked under there maiden names, first names various spellings. > Is it possible for there to be only one name on the index? > If this is not the case does anyone have any ideas on how Mary Jane Mitchell > could also have been put under? > and Jane Macauley? > Any advice would be greatly appreciated as I don't want to spend money on a > copy of the certificates if its wrong. > > Many thanks > > Robyn > New Zealand > > > > ==== NIR-DERRY Mailing List ==== > ~~ The List's Golden Rule ~~ > Keep to genealogy, history, anything ancestors! Keep it Clean & Cool! > Treat others like you want them to treat you ... But *NO* selling! > > ============================== > To join Ancestry.com and access our 1.2 billion online genealogy records, go to: > http://www.ancestry.com/rd/redir.asp?targetid=571&sourceid=1237 > > >