RootsWeb.com Mailing Lists
Total: 1/1
    1. Re: Danville VRs
    2. Charles Brack
    3. Ruth: I agree with you. I believe Mr. Marston, the listowner, already gave his okay on the posting of Danville VRs. On this list or any other list there should be one person, the listowner, that posts policy. I applaud Glenn's efforts in posting this information to the list. If I don't have an interest in a posted subject, I hit the "delete" key. Just my opinion, Charles Ruth Barton wrote: > >-- [ From: Kathi Judkins Abendroth * EMC.Ver #2.5.3 ] -- > > > >Hello All, I too agree with Laird Towle. Danville, has at least two > >books in print which have their vital records which with a small bit > of > >research, the publishing companies could be found in order to > purchase > >this information. If the gentleman listing these records wants to > keep > >doing this he might start up his own page about Danville, NH and list > > >the info there. > > Hi Kathi, I guess I would like to know why you feel this info should > not > be posted to the list? I don't think he should have to start a > separate > list for this and besides how would people find it? It isn't as > though the > Rockin list is a huge and very busy list that can't take the load. I > am on > other lists where somebody always complains about lists of people like > this > one. Lots of people seem to enjoy these lists and get something out > of > them. I feel the ones who don't want them it's because it's not their > > family info, if it was they would be delighted with the info. It's > all > well and good Kathi has books to look stuff up in but I have no idea > whether there is anything about my families in them or not. With > lists > posted if there is something about one of my families it's there for > me to > see. Just my opinion, Ruth > > Ruth (HOUGHTON) BARTON > Westminster,Vermont, USA > mrgjb@sover.net > > ==== NHROCKIN Mailing List ==== > Send messages to the list to the "To" address found above in THIS > message. > To send commands (subscribe/unsubscribe), insert -request between the > L > and the @ in the address. Send only the command. > ****************

    12/27/1998 09:50:54