Yes, I have a list of the Riverside Cemetery burials in New Castle plus the private lots in New CAstle. Can I look something up for you? Also, yes, I've been through those index card boxes in the New CAstle library and have done some research through Ivan Meloon's papers that are also there. Phil Shepard wrote: >Carol and Carolyn > You probably are aware of the fact that there is a large box with New >Castle records in the town library. Many of these records are copies of town >records, wills and deeds. I never had time to go through everything. > Do either of you have a copy of the list of those buried in Portsmouth >cemeteries. The original is in the Portsmouth town library. > > Phil Shepard > >-----Original Message----- >From: Carol White [mailto:[email protected]] >Sent: Monday, April 03, 2006 11:23 AM >To: [email protected] >Subject: [NHROCKIN] JOnes Tangle > >For a long time I also thought that Jones was Jane's last name until I >found the deed and will. > > > >> >>I guess I wasn't the only one who was confused by all this repeated >>inter-marrying of AMAZEENs with AMAZEENs. Two previous researchers >>with whom I corresponded had her maiden name simply as "Jane JONES". >>Also the following two sources lead me to that conclusion: >> >>#1 = "Biographical Review: Sketches of leading citizens of Rockingham >>County, NH" (Boston--Biographical Review Co, 1896). HeritageQuest >>Online Library (March 2004), p329 >> "William AMAZEEN, also a native of [New Castle] succeeded >>his father [Christopher] in business, and for some years dealt largely >>in fish. Later in life he took to seafaring, and died when 86 years >>old. His wife, *whose maiden name was Jane JONES*, spent her life in >>this town, which was her birthplace. She bore him 13 children: namely, >>Sarah, William, Joseph, Rufus, John, Mary, Olive, Clarissa, Adeline, >>Nancy, Eliza Jane, Henry and Frances. Of these, Rufus, John, Henry, >>and Mary are now living (1896)." >> >>#2 = New Castle Town Records, Vol 3 (1756-1858), p249. FHL #15240. >> This record lists the family of William >>AMAZEEN and *Jane JONES* >> >> >> > >According to the New Castle Records and Meloon's papers William and Jane >Amazeen had 16 children. there wasn't an Olive Amazeen; it was Thomas >Oliver who was till alive in 1896 (he died 1909 in South Boston). > William C. Amazeen died in Farmington,. NH, May 1871 according again to >the New CAstle records. Jane died in Farmington 24 Jul 1852. > > > >> >>I'm still a bit tangled, though, on the correct identity of the other >>daughter of William & Jane JONES--the "Mary AMAZEEN" who was to >>inherit 4/5 of William's estate at his wife's death or remarriage. I >>have 15 "Joseph AMAZEEN"s in my current database--and FOUR of these >>married a "Mary"!! Fortunately I have surnames (hopefully correct) >>for all these Marys and only one of them so far is a "JONES". [The >>others are MARDEN, FOSS, and AMAZEEN again (yup!)] >> >>The one whose maiden name was "Mary JONES" was born about 1764. A >>previous correspondent said that she was born in Dover, NH and was the >>daughter of "Samuel JONES & Mary PINKHAM". However he gives no >>documentation for this assertion, so it is 'open to debate'. Do you >>think this is actually the other daughter of William & Jane JONES? >>Her husband was the Joseph AMAZEEN, born 1761-1766, son of Joseph & >>Dorcas AMAZEEN, and he died 6 Mar 1857 at New Castle. >> >>The marriage of this "Joseph AMAZEEN 3rd" and "Mary JONES" was >>published 16 Dec 1787 and they were "married same date", per New >>Castle Town Records, vol 3 (1756-1858), p233 & 263. FHL #15240. >>Researcher Nick Sanborn [[email protected]] in Apr 2004 said Mary was >>the same individual as the "Mrs. Joseph AMAZEEN d. Portsmouth, NH 3 >>Oct 1815, age 51" in Portsmouth, NH records. Her husband later >>remarried a Dorcas AMAZEEN (another AMAZEEN-to-AMAZEEN marriage!), >>the widow of Daniel TREFETHEN. >> >>Do you happen to know any of the children of this "Joseph AMAZEEN & >>Mary JONES" that might help to cement her connection as the dau of >>William & Jane rather than Samuel & Mary? The only child I have >>currently linked to the above couple [rather than one of the other 3 >>"Joseph & Mary" couples] is a Benjamin AMAZEEN, born 5 Sep 1804, based >>on his birthdate in New Castle town records and parentage info from >>the same researcher who gave me the Samuel-Mary JONES link. [Not too >>definitive, huh...]. I have notes on other "children of Joseph" or >>"children of Joseph/Mary" in my research, but at present have no way >>to tell *which* AMAZEEN couple they go with. >> >>Anything further that you might have on the husband or descendants of >>"Mary JONES, dau of William & Jane and sister of Sarah" would be most >>helpful here--even if it is not fully documented yet. Thanks! >> >> >> > >I'm not sure I can help. I've also discussed this with Nick Sanborn. I >have Mary Jones b. abt 1764 m. 16 Dec 1787 Joseph Amazeen and Mary d. 3 >Oct 1815. I have her parents as William and Jane Jones. I also have >Joseph Amazeen (of New Castle, mariner, 14 Apr 1823,) m. Susanna Shannon >24 Nov 1799 in New CAstle. I do not have any info. on Joseph and Mary's >children. Also, in the private Amazeen cemetery lot in New CAstle >there's a Joseph Amazeen d. Oct 30, 1847, age 86 years (b. 1761) and >Mary wife of Joseph Amazeen, d. M ar 18, 1824, aged 60 years (b. 1764). > BUT Joseph son of Christopher Amazeen has a birth date of about 1775. > I think Mary married Joseph son of Joseph & Dorcas Amazeen, but I don't >have acutual proof of this. I think we'll need to do more research on this. > >Here's some more info: There was a William Jones in New cAstle 1748 >(1748 tax list) and a William Jones & son in New CAstle 1720 ((1720 tax >list). A William Jones m. Jane Kelly 11 Nov 1762 in Portsmouth at >Queen's chapel. A William Jones m. Margaret Brewster 13 June 1765 in >Portsmouth at Queen's Chapel. Janes Jones was head of household 1800 in >New CAstle with 1 female under 10 (her granddaughter, Jane, Sarah's >daughter?) and 1 over 45. > > > >>~ Carolyn Depp >> >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: Carol White <mailto:[email protected]> >> To: Carolyn G Depp <mailto:[email protected]> >> Cc: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >> Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2006 3:45 PM >> Subject: Re: BEAL-WHITE-YEATON Tangle >> >> Hello Carolyn, >> >> I'll try to answer your last e-mail. >> >> >> >>> >>> I think the "key" to whether or not the Thomas BEAL (call him #1) >>> who married Mary C. WHITE and the Thomas BEAL (call him #2) who >>> married Grace YEATON are the same individual is whether or not >>> there is any evidence that Mary C. WHITE died before 1827. Do >>> any of you have any evidence one way or the other on this?? >>> >>> >> No I have no evidence as to when she died - none at all. >> >> >> >>> (2) Abigail A. BEAL, born 10 Apr 1827 at New Castle, NH; died 31 >>> Aug 1891 at New Castle, NH; married [I don't have a date] to John >>> TARLTON (1828-1863), son of Capt Elias TARLTON & Ann J. YEATON. >>> Married (2) 2 June 1878 at Kittery, ME to John AMAZEEN >>> (1815-1904) son of William Christopher AMAZEEN and Jane JONES and >>> his second wife. >>> >>> >> William Amazeen m. Jane Jones Amazeen not Jane Jones. See below. >> >> 1) Mary and Sarah Jones were indeed sisters, the only children of >> William and Jane Jones. He leaves in his will (dated 15 June, >> 1795) 4/5 of estate to Mary Amazeen and 1/5 to Jane Jones Amazeen, >> dau of Sarah after his widow's decease or remarriage. Tax list for >> 1797 and '98 list property as "widow Jane Jones", but after this >> says 'estate of Wm. Jones dec'd', so she might have died or >> remarried (don't see her on New Castle marriage lists, though). A >> petition on this estate was made on behalf of the above heirs in >> 1806 by Joseph Amazeen "husband of only surviving child of dec'd" >> and by William Amazeen "husband of the only child of the other >> daughter dec'd", "the 2 daughters being the only children of the >> deceased". >> >> I wish I had something more to offer, but I don't. >> >> Carol >> >> >> >> > > > >==== NHROCKIN Mailing List ==== >A note re AOL blocking Rootsweb List Mail: >It is important that AOL users know not to ever delete mail from >RootsWeb (or that comes to them through RootsWeb) that gets misdirected >to their spam folder directly FROM the spam folder--move it to the inbox >first by clicking THIS IS NOT SPAM and then delete it. Otherwise it >gets reported to AOL as being spam and RootsWeb is blamed. To read more >and join the >discussion, AOL users are advised to join the AOLers-Rootsweb list: >http://lists.rootsweb.com/index/other/RootsWeb_Support/AOLers-RootsWeb.html >.................. > >============================== >Search the US Census Collection. Over 140 million records added in the >last 12 months. Largest online collection in the world. Learn more: >http://www.ancestry.com/s13965/rd.ashx > > > > > >