This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------F3B0A780791BAF4E7FED517E Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit --------------F3B0A780791BAF4E7FED517E Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-ID: <3681E581.CEF36CB3@earthlink.net> Date: Thu, 24 Dec 1998 01:56:01 -0500 From: Cynthia <cyndylou3@earthlink.net> Organization: MA-NH-VT-ME-CT-RI Roots X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04 [en] (Win95; U) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: NHROCKIN-L@rootsweb.com CC: LairdTowle@aol.com Subject: Re: Danville Vital Records References: <01be2eb5$8de7f5a0$LocalHost@john> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------66F49CB94200205B50673D0B" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------66F49CB94200205B50673D0B Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Laird: If this site was just for question and answers.......we'd get bored real quick because often we dont know what questions to ask or have no clue as to where to go next on our searches and when information is shared such as Danville are put on the rootweb site....it gives -- .....CLUES and clues are VITAL PART of our genealogical searches.....especially when the early towns names change over the years and finding ancestors in the orginal town is often frustrating. For example: Hampton,NH-- we have Gove ancestors who settled there around 1665.....today is part of Seabrook, Kingston,East Kingston, Hampton Falls,Sandown,DANVILLE. [did I miss any ?] Just for your information, where Gove lived in Hampton in 1665, today is Seabrook. Right now, Danville may be topic for a week or two and then another topic will surface, and so on........ I vote to keep putting records, regardless of what type or area ,as long as it pertains to genealogical interest, because sooner or later, you will see something that will interest you .....if it doesnt--the delete button is available. Merry Christmas Cynthia : My vote is in favor of continuing publication of these records. I haven't found anything worthwhile yet, but one of these days, who knows? > John Folsom > Orlando, FL > jorfo@prodigy.net > > -----Original Message----- > From: LairdTowle@aol.com <LairdTowle@aol.com> > To: NHROCKIN-L@rootsweb.com <NHROCKIN-L@rootsweb.com> > Date: Wednesday, December 23, 1998 3:32 PM > Subject: Danville Vital Records > > >Hi All: > > > >My understanding of the purpose of this mailing list is that it is > intended to > >be a place for subscribers to post genealogical problems so that > other > >subscribers can help them. In other words, it should consist of > questions and > >answers. > > > >I don't wish to be the grinch who stole Christmas, but it does not > seen to me > >that this mailing list is a suitable place to republish enmass the > Danville > >Vital Records, or any other such material publishished or > unpublished, except > >in response to particular questions from other list members. > > > >If we all started publishing the Rockingham County material we have > at hand, > >the list would soon be clogged with unneeded and unwanted emails > which, it > >seems to me, verge on being spam. > > > >Am I along in feeling this is a diversion, albeit well intentioned, > from our > >real intent? > > > >Laird Towle > > > > > >==== NHROCKIN Mailing List ==== > >Send messages to the list to the "To" address found above in THIS > message. > >To send commands (subscribe/unsubscribe), insert -request between the > L > >and the @ in the address. Send only the command. > >**************** > > > > ==== NHROCKIN Mailing List ==== > RootsWeb Mailing Lists Archives: http://searches.rootsweb.com/cgi-bin/listsearch.pl > Rockingham County GenWeb site: http://www.geocities.com/Heartland/1706/ > **************** --------------66F49CB94200205B50673D0B Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=us-ascii; name="vcard.vcf" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Description: Card for Cynthia Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="vcard.vcf" begin: vcard fn: Cynthia n: ;Cynthia email;internet: cyndylou3@earthlink.net note: Genealogy is a mystery that never ends.... x-mozilla-cpt: ;0 x-mozilla-html: FALSE version: 2.1 end: vcard --------------66F49CB94200205B50673D0B-- --------------F3B0A780791BAF4E7FED517E Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=us-ascii; name="vcard.vcf" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Description: Card for Cynthia Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="vcard.vcf" begin: vcard fn: Cynthia n: ;Cynthia email;internet: cyndylou3@earthlink.net note: Genealogy is a mystery that never ends.... x-mozilla-cpt: ;0 x-mozilla-html: FALSE version: 2.1 end: vcard --------------F3B0A780791BAF4E7FED517E--

Ruth: I agree with you. I believe Mr. Marston, the listowner, already gave his okay on the posting of Danville VRs. On this list or any other list there should be one person, the listowner, that posts policy. I applaud Glenn's efforts in posting this information to the list. If I don't have an interest in a posted subject, I hit the "delete" key. Just my opinion, Charles Ruth Barton wrote: > >-- [ From: Kathi Judkins Abendroth * EMC.Ver #2.5.3 ] -- > > > >Hello All, I too agree with Laird Towle. Danville, has at least two > >books in print which have their vital records which with a small bit > of > >research, the publishing companies could be found in order to > purchase > >this information. If the gentleman listing these records wants to > keep > >doing this he might start up his own page about Danville, NH and list > > >the info there. > > Hi Kathi, I guess I would like to know why you feel this info should > not > be posted to the list? I don't think he should have to start a > separate > list for this and besides how would people find it? It isn't as > though the > Rockin list is a huge and very busy list that can't take the load. I > am on > other lists where somebody always complains about lists of people like > this > one. Lots of people seem to enjoy these lists and get something out > of > them. I feel the ones who don't want them it's because it's not their > > family info, if it was they would be delighted with the info. It's > all > well and good Kathi has books to look stuff up in but I have no idea > whether there is anything about my families in them or not. With > lists > posted if there is something about one of my families it's there for > me to > see. Just my opinion, Ruth > > Ruth (HOUGHTON) BARTON > Westminster,Vermont, USA > mrgjb@sover.net > > ==== NHROCKIN Mailing List ==== > Send messages to the list to the "To" address found above in THIS > message. > To send commands (subscribe/unsubscribe), insert -request between the > L > and the @ in the address. Send only the command. > ****************

Please, folks. Posting of Danville records, or the records of any other Rockingham town, is a non-issue. It's o.k. That isn't to say it is useful for everyone. That's NOT the point. The point is that is on-topic. Opinions, however, about what is or is not useful, or on-topic or not on-topic are NOT what this list is for. That's my job. Write your opinions to me privately, please. Thanks. -- Dick Marston, MARSTON Mail List Owner.

>-- [ From: Kathi Judkins Abendroth * EMC.Ver #2.5.3 ] -- > >Hello All, I too agree with Laird Towle. Danville, has at least two >books in print which have their vital records which with a small bit of >research, the publishing companies could be found in order to purchase >this information. If the gentleman listing these records wants to keep >doing this he might start up his own page about Danville, NH and list >the info there. Hi Kathi, I guess I would like to know why you feel this info should not be posted to the list? I don't think he should have to start a separate list for this and besides how would people find it? It isn't as though the Rockin list is a huge and very busy list that can't take the load. I am on other lists where somebody always complains about lists of people like this one. Lots of people seem to enjoy these lists and get something out of them. I feel the ones who don't want them it's because it's not their family info, if it was they would be delighted with the info. It's all well and good Kathi has books to look stuff up in but I have no idea whether there is anything about my families in them or not. With lists posted if there is something about one of my families it's there for me to see. Just my opinion, Ruth Ruth (HOUGHTON) BARTON Westminster,Vermont, USA mrgjb@sover.net

-- [ From: Kathi Judkins Abendroth * EMC.Ver #2.5.3 ] -- Hello All, I too agree with Laird Towle. Danville, has at least two books in print which have their vital records which with a small bit of research, the publishing companies could be found in order to purchase this information. If the gentleman listing these records wants to keep doing this he might start up his own page about Danville, NH and list the info there. I don't want to sound like the grinch either but it sure would be nice if people would also learn to clean up the note that they are referring to when answering a query. I don't like re-reading a note I read the day before. It is possible to just include the pertainent parts of a previous note and exclude what's not needed. Just to prove I'm not a grinch, I list here books you may be looking for info in, which I'll be glad to look up for you ................... Vol 1-6 Maine Families in 1790 Hist. of Exeter, NH Kingston, NH VR's Early Marriages Strafford Co., NH The New Hampshire Genealogical Record Hopkinton, NH VR's Vermont Families in 1791 NH Genealogical Digest 1623-1900 History of Rye, NH NH 1742 Estate List Notices From the New Hampshire Gazette 1765-1800 A surname guide to both New Hampshire & Massachusetts History of Fayette, ME Dover, NH VR's Wishing all a very Happy New Year. Kathi....... -- Kathi Judkins Abendroth Judkins Family Association Visit our homepage at http://users.aol.com/judkinsfa/judkins.htm

Glen, do you have the list of their grandchildren as published in "Kingston NH Early Families, Patriots Soldiers" by Kathleen E. Hosier? If not, I can list them for you. Joyce in Kingston, NH ---------- > > Hi All, > > Happy holidays. I have been in possession of the Vital Records of > Danville, NH from 1760 to 1886. I will try to post out a year of > births, deaths and marriages each day and hopefully this information > will help someone find their descendants. I will also list Baptisms > from the years 1764 to 1788 when I get to those dates. Also, since no > marriages were listed until 1764 I will list 1760 thru 1763 today. > > Also if someone has any information on Alexander Campbell or his wife > Jeannit (?) who came to Danville abt. 1718 from Ulster, NI. Alexander > supposidly died in Newton, NH abt 1759. His wife died in Kingston, NH > after him. She was living with her son Annas at the time. She was > admitted to the First Congressional Church of Kingston somewhere around > 1770s. > Alex owned land in Chester and Danville and was last known to be > living in Newton around the time of his death. > > Danville 1760-1763 > BIRTHS > (d/o means daughter of and s/o means son of) > --------------------- > 1760 > ---- > Dimond, Hannah d/o Israel & Mary (Stevens-Philbrick) b. Mar. 3 > Sanborn, Jonathan s/o Jonathan & Mary (Bachelor) Mar. 4 > Robey, Lucy d/o Samuel & Hannah (Merrill) Mar. 6 > Clough, Tabetha d/o Elisha & Mary (Welch) Mar. 29 > Hook, Elizabeth d/o Humphrey & Hannah (Philbrick) Mar. 30 > Eastman, Thomas s/o Edward & Sarah (Wadleigh-Clough) Sep. 15 > Quimby, Anna d/o Samuel & Ann (Young) Sep. 22 > Quimby, Mary d/o David & Mary (Wadleigh) Nov. 6 > Bachelor, David s/o Reuben & Miriam (Fifield) Nov. 24 > > 1761 > ---- > Sanborn, Elizabeth d/o John & Sarah (Elkins) b. Feb. 7 > Page, Abigail d/o Ephraim & Hannah (Currier) Mar. 23 > Towle, Abigail d/o Caleb Jr. & Ruth (Page) Mar. 24 > Blake, Sarah d/o Jonathan & Mary (Sanborn) May 5 > Colby, Enos s/o Moses & Anna (Tuxbury) May 13 > Brown, Isaac s/o Joseph & Elizabeth (Sawyer) May 24 > Tilton, Deborah d/o David & Rebecca (Green) May 29 > Hook, Abigail d/o Jacob & Mary (Bachelor) Aug. 1 > Collins, Moses s/o Joseph & Sarah (Bagley) Aug. 5 > French, Jonathan s/o Jonathan Jr. & Ann (Bagley) Aug. 7 > Rowe, Hannah d/o John and Hannah (Goss) Aug. 15 > Quimby, Mary d/o Moses & Judith (Bean) Sep. 17 > Clifford, Hannah d/o Joseph & Eleanor (Wadleigh) Sep. 28 > Campbell, Phineas s/o Annas & Abigail (Pike) Nov. 10 > Eastman, Elizabeth d/o Edward & Sarah (Wadleigh-Clough) Dec. 17 > > 1762 > ---- > Folinsby, James s/o William & Sarah (George) b. Jan. 1 > Fellows, Joseph s/o Samuel & Mary (Ring) Jan. 7 > Cilley, Daniel s/o John & Abigail (Clark) Mar. 1 > Bachelor, Anne d/o Reuben & Miriam (Fifield) Mar. 4 > Darling, Reuben s/o Benjamin & Hannah Mar. 8 > Page, Benjamin s/o John & Anne (Webster) Mar. 10 > Quimby, David s/o David & Mary (Wadleigh) Mar. 13 > Robey, Ichabod s/o Samuel & Hannah (Merrill) Apr. 15 > Hook, Hannah d/o Humphrey & Hannah (Philbrick) Aug. 9 > Rowe, John s/o John and Hannah (Goss) Sep. 11 > Dimond, John s/o Israel & Mary (Stevens-Philbrick) Sep. 18 > Morrill, Nathaniel s/o Henry & Susanna (Folsom) Oct. 1 > Nichols, Martha d/o James & Mercy (Hubbard-Pressey) Oct. 21 > Bachelor, Dorothy d/o Elisha & Theodate (Smith) Nov. 17 > Sanborn, Nabba d/o Joseph C. & Elizabeth (French) Dec. 25 > > 1763 > ---- > Tilton, Rebecca d/o David & Rebecca (Green) Jan. 4 > Quimby, Zipporah d/o Aaron & Mary (Towle) Mar. 8 > Tucker, Jonathan s/o Joseph & Susey Mar. 19 > Eastman, Phebe d/o Edward & Sarah (Wadleigh-Clough) Apr. 9 > Sanborn, Ruth d/o John & Sarah (Elkins) Apr. 16 > Page, Anna d/o Ephraim & Hannah (Currier) Apr. 30 > Campbell, Ruth d/o Annas & Abigail (Pike) May 27 > Quimby, Benjamin s/o Samuel & Ann (Young) Jul. 7 > Bartlett, Anne d/o George & Priscilla (Tuxbury) Sep. 21 > Dearborn, Nathaniel s/o Henry & Theodate (Hutchinson) Sep. 23 > Page, Simon s/o Thomas & Mary (Elkins) Nov. 25 > Bachelor, Phineas s/o Reuben & Miriam (Fifield) Dec. 1 > Cilley, Judith d/o John & Abigail (Clark) Dec. 6 > Hook, Peter s/o Dyer & Hannah (Brown) Dec. 15 > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > DEATHS > (NDG meas no date given) > --------------------- > 1760 > ---- > Thomas Elliot Colby age 26 born Amesbury, Mass. Husband > of Susannah (Ring) Colby at Crown Point, New York d. Oct. 4 > > Paul Pressy age 31 born Amesbury, Mass. A blacksmith. > Husband of Mercy (Hubbard) Pressy NDG > > 1761 > ---- > Joseph Bean Jr. NDG > > 1762 > ---- > No Records > > 1763 > ---- > No Records > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > > > > ==== NHROCKIN Mailing List ==== > Send messages to the list to the "To" address found above in THIS message. > To send commands (subscribe/unsubscribe), insert -request between the L > and the @ in the address. Send only the command. > **************** > >

Which Henry are you looking for? I have quite a lot of Elkins material. There was a Henry, son of Gershom, who was killed by Indians 17 Sep 1707 in Kingston. Joyce Collins Tebbetts Davies in Kingston, NH ---------- > Hi all- > I'm new to the list - I don't know what took me so long, considering the > number of lines I have here. Oh well. Here are my lines in Rockingham > County, along with the town and time period. > CLOUGH (collateral line: YOUNG) - ca 1750-1834, Epping, Hawke, Poplin > ELKINS - ca 1796-1899, Kingston, Danville > FOLSOM (collateral lines: BRACKETT,GILMAN,MILLS) - ca 1682-1830, Exeter > KIMBALL (collateral lines: STEWART)- ca 1730-1900, Poplin, Chester > MORSE (collateral lines: BLAISDELL, KELLEY/KELLY): ca 1745-1889, Chester > I have most of the info on the main lines - and I'm happy to share. The only > one I don't have a lot on is ELKINS - I can't decide who Henry's father is. > I'd really like to get information on the collateral lines - any help > gratefully accepted! > Karen Kimball > klkimball@aol.com > > > ==== NHROCKIN Mailing List ==== > Send messages to the list to the "To" address found above in THIS message. > To send commands (subscribe/unsubscribe), insert -request between the L > and the @ in the address. Send only the command. > **************** > >

Hi, I ahve been away for the holidays, so am just catching up on my e-mail. I will offer a big vote in favor of continuing to publish the Vital Records of Danville (or any other locality) on the list. I seems to me a wonderful way to share data, which might not be available to those of us researching in New Hampshire but living elsewhere. Happy New Year, Charlene Charlene Fox Clemons Assistant Director Ellsworth Public Library 46 State St. Ellsworth, Maine 04605

Rev. John Page's records were written at the time of the actual happening. Town records were not started that early but "catch-up" was done in later years. ---------- > > > Well to start off there is a comment that goes as follows: > > "1772 TILTON Genealogy page 252 gives Josiah Tilton b. Jan. 7, 1772, > but does not give Hannah as being b. Sept. 9, 1772. Rev. John > Page give the date of death of Josiah as Jan. 7, 1772. Town > records give the date of birth for Josiah as Feb. 23 or 25, 1768." > > To all that have interest in this record, IMHO, you should check the > TILTON Genealogy book out and see who wrote it, when it was written, and > if there were any errors recorded from the time it was written to now. > The records of the town and the Rev. Page would, to me, seem to be the > best records for Josiah and Hannah as they were registers from the time > that the incidents occurred. > > BIRTHS > (d/o means daughter of and s/o means son of) > (* means record was taken from Rev. John Page Death Records) > ------------------------------------------------------------ > 1772 > ---- > Tucker, Samuel s/o Joseph & Susey b. Mar. 12 > Elkins, Hulda d/o Peter & Huldah (Buswell) Mar. 17 > Cilley, John s/o John & Abigail (Clark) Apr. 2 > Page, John s/o Rev. John & Mary (Stevens) Jul. 16 > Towle, Esther d/o James & Abigail (Colby) Aug. 7 > Tilton, Hannah d/o David & Rebecca (Green) Sep. 9 > Philbrick, Josiah s/o Jedediah & Mary (Sanborn) Sep. 23 > Williams, Sarah d/o Joseph & Mary (Pike) Oct. 30 > Sanborn, Sarah d/o Joseph C. & Elizabeth (French) Nov. 1 > Brown, Hannah d/o Nathaniel & Mary (Clifford) Dec. 12 > Sanborn, Peter s/o John & Sarah (Elkins) Dec. 17 > > 1773 > ---- > Quimby, Abigail d/o Samuel & Ann (Young) b. Feb. 7 > Worth, Jacob s/o Timothy & Susanna (Gove) Mar. 15 > Jones, Amos s/o Nathan Jr. & Mary (Collins) Mar. 18 > Darling, Molly d/o Abraham & Molly (Russell) Apr. 6 > Jones, Molly d/o Jonathan & Hanney Apr. 8 > Hoyt, Moses s/o Moses & Mary (Nelson) Apr. 11 > Bachelor, Jonathan s/o Reuben & Miriam (Fifield) Apr. 26 > True, Hannah d/o Reuben & Hannah (Osgood) May 21 > Bachelor, Elisha s/o Elisha & Theodate (Smith) May 22 > Ordway, Ruth d/o Nehemiah & Ruth Jun. 18 > Page, Mary d/o Thomas & Mary (Elkins) Jun. 27 > Collins, Elizabeth d/o Joseph & Sarah (Bagley) Jul. 20 > Tucker, Jonathan s/o Ebenezer & Mary (Cilley) Aug. 12 > Bartlett, Hannah d/o George & Priscilla (Tuxbury) Sep. 7 > Collins, Hannah d/o Tristram & Rachel (Hunt) Sep. 24 > Sleeper, Henry s/o Nehemiah & Apphia (Morrill) Oct. 10 > Page, Samuel s/o Ephraim & Hannah (Currier) Oct. 13 > *Collins, Joseph s/o Richard & Sarah (Buswell) Dec. 3 > Campbell, Molly d/o Annas Jr. & Elizabeth (Webster) Dec. 5 > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > BAPTISIMS > --------- > 1772 > ---- > Tucker, Moses s/o Ebenezer Tucker bap. Jan. 5 > Elkins, Hulda d/o Peter Elkins Mar. 8 > Tossy, Moses s/o Gideon Tossy of Poplin May 17 > Sleeper, Susanna d/o Nehemiah Sleeper May 17 > Tuxbury, Mary d/o Josiah Tuxbury May 17 > Scribner, Rachel d/o Nehemiah Scribner Jul. 5 > Page, John s/o Rev. John Page Jul. 19 > Tobey, Nathan s/o William Tobey Aug. 23 > Kelley, Mary d/o Daniel Kelley Aug. 30 > Towle, Esther d/o James Towle Aug. 30 > Tilton, Hannah d/o David Tilton Oct. 25 > Sanborn, Sarah d/o Joseph C. Sanborn Nov. 8 > Sanborn, Stevens s/o John Sanborn, East Parish Nov. 22 > Philbrick, Josiah s/o Jedediah Philbrick Nov. 29 > Eleanor, a servant maid of Elizabeth Huntington Dec. 13 > > 1773 > ---- > Brown, Henry s/o Joseph Brown bap. Feb. 14 > Sanborn, Peter s/o John Sanborn Feb. 28 > Fellows, David s/o Samuel Fellows Mar. 14 > Quimby, Abigail d/o Samuel Quimby Mar. 21 > Worth, Jacob s/o Timothy Worth Apr. 4 > Hoyt, Moses s/o Moses Hoyt Apr. 18 > Darling, Molly d/o Abraham Darling May 9 > True, Hannah d/o Reuben True May 16 > Scribner, Benjamin s/o Benjamin Scribner May 16 > Batchelder, Jonathan s/o Reuben Batchelder May 30 > Batchelder, Elisha s/o Elisha Batchelder Jun. 20 > March, Henry s/o John March Jul. 4 > Page, Mary d/o Thomas Page Aug. 1 > Tucker, Jonathan s/o Ebenezer Tucker Sep. 26 > Bartlett, Hannah d/o George Bartlett Oct. 10 > Tobey, Hulda d/o William Tobey of Poplin Nov. 14 > Sleeper, Henry s/o Nehemiah Sleeper Nov. 21 > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > MARRIAGES > --------- > 1772 > ---- > Daniel Whittier & Molly Quimby of Kingston m. Jan. 1 > Henry Blaisdell of Kingston & Sarah Dolloffe of Hawke Mar. 4 > John Sleeper & Judith Badger of Kingston Apr. 2 > Richard Moody & Dorothy Smith of Poplin Apr. 16 > Timothy Simonds of Concord & Love Ladd of Sanborn Jun. 1 > Jacob Ordway of Kingston & Mary Tilton of Hawke Jun. 3 > Jonathan Fyfield & Dorcus Pierson of Kingston Jun. 4 > David Kimbal & Abigail Hutchins of Poplin Jun. 8 > Abraham Darling & Mary Russel of Hawke Jun. 30 > Benjamin Eaton of Newbury & Hannah Pearson of Kingston Jul. 23 > Caleb Seever of Kingston & Patience Johnson of Plaistow Aug. 6 > Benjamin Sanborn & Hannah Thorn of Kingston Aug. 25 > Jonathan Woodman of Kingston & Mary Elkins of Hawke Aug. 27 > Jonathan Coffin & Jane Brown of Poplin Sep. 17 > Simon Flanders of Hawke & Hannah Levit of Epping Sep. 29 > Zebedee Ring & Hannah Easterbrook of Salisbury Oct. 15 > Levi Merrill of Poplin & Hannah Bean of Raymond Oct. 20 > Jacob Wells of Sandown & Jemima WIlliams of Hawke Oct. 22 > > 1773 > ---- > Jacob Clifford of Candia & Abigail Tandy of Kingston m. Jan. 7 > Francis Coummo of Haverhill & Judith Davies of Kingston Jan. 21 > Mardin Emerson of Weare & Nanny Carr of Kingston Feb. 3 > Benoni Gorden of Poplin & Molly Gorden of Brentwood Mar. 25 > Nathaniel Clark & Miriam Weed of Hawke Jun. 3 > Thomas Merrill & Mary Gilman of Kingston Jun. 30 > Eliphalet Daniels & Sarah Derew of Portsmouth Jul. 1 > Peter Fifield & Sarah French of Kingston Jul. 5 > Challis Sargent of Kingston & Jane Buswell of Hawke Oct. 18 > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > DEATHS > (NDG meas no date given) > (* means record was taken from Rev. John Page Death Records) > ------------------------------------------------------------ > 1772 > ---- > *Josiah Tilton age 4. Son of David & Rebecca (Green) d. Jan. 7 > > *Annas Campbell age 56 born Ireland. Husband of > Abigail (Pike) Jan. 28 > > *Child of Joseph Sweat Feb. 21 > > *Child of Widow Follensby Feb. 25 > > *Ephraim Elkins age 62. Husband of Sarah (Blake) Apr. 16 > > *Rhoda Quimby age 2. Daughter of David & Mary (Wadleigh) Aug. 3 > > > 1773 > ---- > *Judith Cilley age 10 born Hawke. Daughter of John & > Abigail (Clark) d. Jun. 7 > > *Lydia French. Daughter of Jonathan Jr. & Ann (Bagley) Jun. 7 > > Phineas Sanborn age 26. Husband of Jul. 11 > Mary (Adams) Sanborn - 18 > > *An infant child of Johana Stevens Jul. 28 > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > There will be no records tomorrow as it is Xmas eve. Have a safe and > happy one. > > Glenn > > > > ==== NHROCKIN Mailing List ==== > Send messages to the list to the "To" address found above in THIS message. > To send commands (subscribe/unsubscribe), insert -request between the L > and the @ in the address. Send only the command. > **************** > >

Just a word of caution .... I believe Glen is copying these not from the actual vital records but from a book published by the Hawke Historical Society in 1979 and is therefore subject to error, although the information was copied from the original record. Corrections and additions were published in 1992. If anyone is looking for information after 1886, I'll be glad to help as I have extensive material on Danville/Hawke, including cemetery records. Also, be aware that not all VR's were recorded back in the 1800's. Joyce Collins Tebbetts Davies in Kingston. NH ---------- > > > Dear Laird, > > In response to your concern for the information I am entering. If I am > out of order please remove me from this roots-l. > > I feel sharing information is the VITAL reason for these forums. If one > doesn't want to look there, there is a delete key with one stroke that > can resolve your anguish. > > As for your suggestion of it on the verge of being a spam. I resent your > suggestion and you should review what spam is before implying and showing > negative animosity. > > I don't know your real reason for wanting this flow of information to > stop but why did you become an internet user in the first place if it > wasn't for this exact reason? > > If there is another forum that this information should possibly go to I > would be happy to send it there. Again, please let me know if I am out > of order. > > And yes Laird it is WELL INTENTIONED. > Glenn Campbell > > > ==== NHROCKIN Mailing List ==== > RootsWeb Mailing Lists Archives: > http://searches.rootsweb.com/cgi-bin/listsearch.pl > Rockingham County GenWeb site: http://www.geocities.com/Heartland/1706/ > **************** > >

Excuse me-but I thought lists were also a "learning tool"along with questions--.After all if one reponses to a question-isn't that a form of material? I for one have learned a great deal of an area not aquainted with(except to vacation)to me through such information. Please, if want to continue this-please e-mail me private. Reseacher that likes history aded to "bones". Cheryl

I will be out of the office from 12/24/98 until 01/04/99. We are shutdown for the Christmas / New Years Holidays. If you have an urgent need please contact Bill Hoadley at Hoadley@poci.amis.com. Merry Christmas and Happy New Years! Regards, Tom

Hi all I'm relatively new to genealogy (3 and 1/2 months) and LOVE to get anything that might relate. I've learned so much from lists like this one, not just about my lines, which actually has been little, but about the times and the connections of one line to another. I also belong to specific name lists, but don't find them nearly as helpful. There is something about the community that a list like this one has that really appeals to me. I definitely do my share of deleting, but I also do my share of saving. I have, not only specific files for my lines, but also a general Genealogy file, where I save anything that I think might be useful later that doesn't relate specifically to a particular branch. I have been amazed at what I've learned in just this short amount of time. I almost always check out any URL that someone suggests and have LEARNED a lot. Maybe as I grow more knowledgeable, I won't find a list like this so fascinating, but right now, almost anything is interesting to me and I am grateful that someone like Glenn is taking the time to inform and educate me. There, that is my two cents... Leslie Louise Temples wrote: > Hello Laird: > > These postings have given me answers to questions that I had not thought of > posting because I didn't know the place of origin for the vital records. It also > gives me an idea of the larger picture of the relationships between the different > names (as in making them contemporaries of each other). I am at times too focused > on the smaller picture and forget the large ones. If someone makes a different > mailing list for this type of post I wouldn't be adverse to the idea. I would > just hate to lose access to something as valuable to this type of posting. > > Louise Temples > pc_genie@ix.netcom.com > > LairdTowle@aol.com wrote: > > > Hi All: > > > > My understanding of the purpose of this mailing list is that it is intended to > > be a place for subscribers to post genealogical problems so that other > > subscribers can help them. In other words, it should consist of questions and > > answers. > > > > I don't wish to be the grinch who stole Christmas, but it does not seen to me > > that this mailing list is a suitable place to republish enmass the Danville > > Vital Records, or any other such material publishished or unpublished, except > > in response to particular questions from other list members. > > > > If we all started publishing the Rockingham County material we have at hand, > > the list would soon be clogged with unneeded and unwanted emails which, it > > seems to me, verge on being spam. > > > > Am I along in feeling this is a diversion, albeit well intentioned, from our > > real intent? > > > > Laird Towle > > > > ==== NHROCKIN Mailing List ==== > > Send messages to the list to the "To" address found above in THIS message. > > To send commands (subscribe/unsubscribe), insert -request between the L > > and the @ in the address. Send only the command. > > **************** > > ==== NHROCKIN Mailing List ==== > RootsWeb Mailing Lists Archives: http://searches.rootsweb.com/cgi-bin/listsearch.pl > Rockingham County GenWeb site: http://www.geocities.com/Heartland/1706/ > ****************

I have at least one ancestor that was ex-communicated in Dorchester, MA and removed to the town of Exeter, NH in the early 1600s. My ancestor was Thomas WILSON, who was "ruler" of the town in the early 1600s. Thomas and others that left Dorchester were probably what was referred to as "non-conformists" by the established church in Dorchester. My question: What affiliation was the Church in Exeter that served the non-conformists from the Dorchester Company? thanks, Charles

I am trying to locate the burial sites of some of my Ulster Scot ancestors who died in the Londonderry area in the 1700s. Is there an index that may help me find where they are interred? If not, how do I locate them? thanks, Charles

Hello Laird: These postings have given me answers to questions that I had not thought of posting because I didn't know the place of origin for the vital records. It also gives me an idea of the larger picture of the relationships between the different names (as in making them contemporaries of each other). I am at times too focused on the smaller picture and forget the large ones. If someone makes a different mailing list for this type of post I wouldn't be adverse to the idea. I would just hate to lose access to something as valuable to this type of posting. Louise Temples pc_genie@ix.netcom.com LairdTowle@aol.com wrote: > Hi All: > > My understanding of the purpose of this mailing list is that it is intended to > be a place for subscribers to post genealogical problems so that other > subscribers can help them. In other words, it should consist of questions and > answers. > > I don't wish to be the grinch who stole Christmas, but it does not seen to me > that this mailing list is a suitable place to republish enmass the Danville > Vital Records, or any other such material publishished or unpublished, except > in response to particular questions from other list members. > > If we all started publishing the Rockingham County material we have at hand, > the list would soon be clogged with unneeded and unwanted emails which, it > seems to me, verge on being spam. > > Am I along in feeling this is a diversion, albeit well intentioned, from our > real intent? > > Laird Towle > > ==== NHROCKIN Mailing List ==== > Send messages to the list to the "To" address found above in THIS message. > To send commands (subscribe/unsubscribe), insert -request between the L > and the @ in the address. Send only the command. > ****************

Does anyone have an idea of when the church records begin for the Presbyterian Church at Londonderry? thanks, Charles

This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------66F49CB94200205B50673D0B Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Laird: If this site was just for question and answers.......we'd get bored real quick because often we dont know what questions to ask or have no clue as to where to go next on our searches and when information is shared such as Danville are put on the rootweb site....it gives -- .....CLUES and clues are VITAL PART of our genealogical searches.....especially when the early towns names change over the years and finding ancestors in the orginal town is often frustrating. For example: Hampton,NH-- we have Gove ancestors who settled there around 1665.....today is part of Seabrook, Kingston,East Kingston, Hampton Falls,Sandown,DANVILLE. [did I miss any ?] Just for your information, where Gove lived in Hampton in 1665, today is Seabrook. Right now, Danville may be topic for a week or two and then another topic will surface, and so on........ I vote to keep putting records, regardless of what type or area ,as long as it pertains to genealogical interest, because sooner or later, you will see something that will interest you .....if it doesnt--the delete button is available. Merry Christmas Cynthia : My vote is in favor of continuing publication of these records. I haven't found anything worthwhile yet, but one of these days, who knows? > John Folsom > Orlando, FL > jorfo@prodigy.net > > -----Original Message----- > From: LairdTowle@aol.com <LairdTowle@aol.com> > To: NHROCKIN-L@rootsweb.com <NHROCKIN-L@rootsweb.com> > Date: Wednesday, December 23, 1998 3:32 PM > Subject: Danville Vital Records > > >Hi All: > > > >My understanding of the purpose of this mailing list is that it is > intended to > >be a place for subscribers to post genealogical problems so that > other > >subscribers can help them. In other words, it should consist of > questions and > >answers. > > > >I don't wish to be the grinch who stole Christmas, but it does not > seen to me > >that this mailing list is a suitable place to republish enmass the > Danville > >Vital Records, or any other such material publishished or > unpublished, except > >in response to particular questions from other list members. > > > >If we all started publishing the Rockingham County material we have > at hand, > >the list would soon be clogged with unneeded and unwanted emails > which, it > >seems to me, verge on being spam. > > > >Am I along in feeling this is a diversion, albeit well intentioned, > from our > >real intent? > > > >Laird Towle > > > > > >==== NHROCKIN Mailing List ==== > >Send messages to the list to the "To" address found above in THIS > message. > >To send commands (subscribe/unsubscribe), insert -request between the > L > >and the @ in the address. Send only the command. > >**************** > > > > ==== NHROCKIN Mailing List ==== > RootsWeb Mailing Lists Archives: http://searches.rootsweb.com/cgi-bin/listsearch.pl > Rockingham County GenWeb site: http://www.geocities.com/Heartland/1706/ > **************** --------------66F49CB94200205B50673D0B Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=us-ascii; name="vcard.vcf" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Description: Card for Cynthia Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="vcard.vcf" begin: vcard fn: Cynthia n: ;Cynthia email;internet: cyndylou3@earthlink.net note: Genealogy is a mystery that never ends.... x-mozilla-cpt: ;0 x-mozilla-html: FALSE version: 2.1 end: vcard --------------66F49CB94200205B50673D0B--

This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------58A4110C29E51A742E1DAC8E Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > > I am sent my $24 a month ago....... What would we do without rootsweb? > > Cynthia > > >>ROOTSWEB AND USGENWEB IN JEOPARDY - ?? << > > >>DONATIONS TO HELP SUPPORT ROOTSWEB ARE GREATLY APPRECIATED. For > details about support levels/benefits and payment options, please > visit: <http://www.rootsweb.com/rootsweb/how-to-subscribe.html> > or send e-mail to: <RW-info@rootsweb.com>. RootsWeb's address is: > RootsWeb Genealogical Data Cooperative, P.O. Box 6798, Frazier > Park, CA 93222-6798. (Please include your e-mail address on all > correspondence and checks.)<< (copied from the Rootsweb Review, Vol. 1-27) > > Dianne > *proud sponsor of Rootsweb* > > --part0_914430685_boundary-- > > ==== MAME Mailing List ==== > CURRENT LISTS NOW AVAILABLE-------- > http://users.aol.com/johnf14246/gen_mail.html > These lists are FREE! --------------58A4110C29E51A742E1DAC8E Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=us-ascii; name="vcard.vcf" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Description: Card for Cynthia Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="vcard.vcf" begin: vcard fn: Cynthia n: ;Cynthia email;internet: cyndylou3@earthlink.net note: Genealogy is a mystery that never ends.... x-mozilla-cpt: ;0 x-mozilla-html: FALSE version: 2.1 end: vcard --------------58A4110C29E51A742E1DAC8E--

Christine Pettit wrote: > > Questions and concerns regarding issues such as this should be sent to the > listowner, Dick Marston, directly, not to the list. Apparently he is not > available right now, but I'm sure he will be happy to address this himself > as soon as possible. > Christine Pettit > California > > http://www.familytreemaker.com/users/p/e/t/Christine-M-Pettit/ > > ==== NHROCKIN Mailing List ==== > Send messages to the list to the "To" address found above in THIS message. > To send commands (subscribe/unsubscribe), insert -request between the L > and the @ in the address. Send only the command. > **************** Oh, I'm available, thanks, and I do agree with the general sentiment. I can assure everyone that if I thought that Glenn's contributions were inappropriate, I'd have stepped in long ago. And, yes, I would appreciate it in the future if any of you think that a topic is inappropriate ("off-topic"), that you take it up with me first. It was not my intent, by being a "hands-on" list owner, to put such issues to a vote. I'm not shy about telling someone when I think he or she has strayed from the mark. It may be a dictatorship, but I hope it will always be a benevolent one. Happy holidays, Rockin' Rooters! Let's get on with Rockingham genealogy and history. Peace be with you! -- Dick Marston, MARSTON Mail List Owner.