Geoff, Do you have any NEWTONs from Jefferson Co., IL? http://jefferson.ilgenweb.net/bios/drnewton.htm From: "Geoff Barnett" Subject: Re: [NEWTON] Mecklenburg Co. VA Newtons Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 12:26:25 -0000 not me .... ----- Original Message ----- From: "Judy" <jryden@charter.net> To: <NEWTON-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2009 8:18 PM Subject: [NEWTON] Mecklenburg Co. VA Newtons > Does anyone have a connection to this line? > > 1. Robert Newton b.1763, St James Parish, Mecklenburg, Virginia, USA > d.1811, St James Parish, Mecklenburg, > Virginia, USA > +Mary Read b.1765, St James Parish, Mecklenburg, Virginia, USA > d.1838, St James Parish, Mecklenburg, > Virginia, USA > 2. Joseph Newton b.1797, St James Parish, Mecklenburg, > Virginia, USA > d.1866, Broad Ford, Smyth, > Virginia, USA > +Mary Francis Kimble b.20 Jan 1799, St James Parish, > Mecklenburg, North Carolina > d.13 Apr 1891, Marion, > Smyth, Virginia, USA > Marriage:24 Dec 1817, > Mecklenburg, Virginia, USA > 3. Joanna Read Newton b.20 Jan 1819, Mecklenburg, > Virginia, USA > d.02 Jun 1904, > Grahan, Wythe, Virginia, USA > 3. Susannah Nichols Newton b.20 Jan 1819 St James Parish, > Mecklenburg, Virginia > d.1905 , Smyth, > Virginia, USA > 3. Robert Henry Newton b.1821, Mecklenburg, North > Carolina, USA > d.1881 > 3. Wiley Kimble Newton b.14 Dec 1822, Washington, > Virginia, USA > d.05 Aug 1864, > Tazewell, Virginia, USA > 3. Sarah Saunders Newton b.1826, Broad Ford, Smyth, > Virginia, USA > d. > 3. Nancy Newton b.1827, Washington, Virginia, > USA > d. > 3. Elizabeth Gates Newton b.1828, Washington, Virginia, USA > d. > 3. Betsey Newton b.1830 , , Virginia, USA > d. > 3. William H Newton b.09 Feb 1830, Broad Ford, > Smyth, Virginia, USA > d.29 Mar 1893 > 4. John S Newton b.13 Nov 1830, Washington, > Virginia, USA > d.08 Jun 1909 > 4. Mary Adams Newton b.10 Oct 1836, Washington, > Virginia, USA > d.09 Jun 1922, > Olympia, Smyth, Virginia, USA > Judy > jryden@charter.net > > Life is not about waiting for the storm to pass.... It's about > learning to dance in the rain. Judy jryden@charter.net Life is not about waiting for the storm to pass.... It's about learning to dance in the rain.

I've "rescued" an old photograph identified as Minnie DODD and Edwin NEWTON which was taken at the J. S. Potter Studio in Portland, Oregon. The photograph appears to have been taken in the 1880's or 1890's with Minnie likely in her 20's or 30's and Edwin appearing to be younger, may be in his teens. I am hoping to locate someone from the family so that this wonderful old photograph can be returned to the care of family. If you are a member of this family, or you know someone who might be, please contact me. Thanks, Shelley

Hi Folks, Reporting Node 29, which existing participant thereof claims as descent that seen below. Node 29 is very close to the existing Node R, and thus it is likely that it descends from it. Node R is that of Rev. Roger Newton, also of Connecticut. Investigation will be ongoing in an effort to determine from which line of descent 29 descends from R. FTDNA#156044 8 Cyrus Newton Born: 05 DEC 1776, Connecticut. Married: Deborah Doane. Died: Aft 1860, Chenango County, New York. 7 Luther Sidney Newton Born: 10 NOV 1800, Connecticut. Married: Abigail Carr, Abt. 1841, Chenango or Steuben County, New York. Died: 15 MAR 1888, Steuben County, New York. 6 Willet Clyde Newton Born: 20 JUL 1844, Woodhull, Steuben County, New York. Married: Jouliett Fuller, 06 DEC 1866, Woodhull, Steuben County, New York. Died: 20 OCT 1911, Coldspring, Cattaraugus County, New York. 5 Philander Meade Newton Born: 09 Aug 1872, Carrolton, Cattaraugus County, New York. Married: Lettie Belle Myers, 23 Oct 1894, Cattaraugus County, New York. Died: 07 FEB 1952, Olean, Cattaraugus County, New York. 4 George Marion Newton Born: 13 JUN 1897, Steamburg, Cattaraugus County, New York. Married: Mildred Adrian Tennies, 13 JUN 1918, Allegany, Cattaraugus County, New York. Died: 20 MAR 1977, Deland, Volusia County, Florida. The project webpage is here: http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~gbonner/newtondna/ Cheers, Gregg Bonner NEWTON Surname DNA Project Group Administrator

----- Original Message ----- From: "Geoff Barnett" <g.barnett63@btinternet.com> To: <newton@rootsweb.com> Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 4:25 PM Subject: Re: [NEWTON] DNA Project: Vol. 45 (Wm. Newton, d. 17 JUL 1929,Hot Springs, Fall River County, South Dakota) > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Gregg Bonner" <greggbonner@yahoo.com> > To: <newton-l@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 1:38 AM > Subject: [NEWTON] DNA Project: Vol. 45 (Wm. Newton, d. 17 JUL 1929,Hot > Springs, Fall River County, South Dakota) > > >> Reporting Node 28, with the following claimed descent: >> >> 7 Thomas Newton Born: England. >> Died: England. >> 6 William Newton Born: 19 SEP 1795, Chester, Cheshire, England. >> Died: 01 JUN 1836, Cheshire, England. >> 5 Clement Newton Born: 21 JUN 1826, Congleton, Cheshire, England. >> Died: 31 JAN 1872, New Brighton, Richmond County, New York. >> Note: Family stories and letters report that Clement Newton adopted his >> son, William Newton, b. 1845 after marrying William's mother. Other >> records and circumstances, however, indicate a strong possibility that >> Clement was in fact the biological father of William. >> 4 William Newton Born: 31 DEC 1845, Hanover Square, London, England. >> Died: 17 JUL 1929, Hot Springs, Fall River County, South Dakota. >> 3 Mark Hartley Newton Born: 11 FEB 1880, Harvard, Clay County, Nebraska. >> Died: 30 MAR 1949, Custer City, Custer County, Oklahoma. >> 2 Cecil Faye Newton Born: 03 JUN 1905, Thomas, Custer County, Oklahoma. >> Died: SEP 1964, Denver, Colorado. >> 1 Stephen Frazier Newton FTDNA#154293 >> >> The above sample represents the 2nd Project sample which (very likely) >> traces to across the pond. >> >> Best, >> >> Gregg Bonner >> NEWTON Surname DNA Project Group Administrator >> >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >> NEWTON-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the >> quotes >> in the subject and the body of the message > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > NEWTON-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes > in the subject and the body of the message -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.5.392 / Virus Database: 270.13.45/2285 - Release Date: 08/06/09 05:57:00

----- Original Message ----- From: "Gregg Bonner" <greggbonner@yahoo.com> To: <newton-l@rootsweb.com> Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 1:38 AM Subject: [NEWTON] DNA Project: Vol. 45 (Wm. Newton, d. 17 JUL 1929,Hot Springs, Fall River County, South Dakota) > Reporting Node 28, with the following claimed descent: > > 7 Thomas Newton Born: England. > Died: England. > 6 William Newton Born: 19 SEP 1795, Chester, Cheshire, England. > Died: 01 JUN 1836, Cheshire, England. > 5 Clement Newton Born: 21 JUN 1826, Congleton, Cheshire, England. > Died: 31 JAN 1872, New Brighton, Richmond County, New York. > Note: Family stories and letters report that Clement Newton adopted his > son, William Newton, b. 1845 after marrying William's mother. Other > records and circumstances, however, indicate a strong possibility that > Clement was in fact the biological father of William. > 4 William Newton Born: 31 DEC 1845, Hanover Square, London, England. > Died: 17 JUL 1929, Hot Springs, Fall River County, South Dakota. > 3 Mark Hartley Newton Born: 11 FEB 1880, Harvard, Clay County, Nebraska. > Died: 30 MAR 1949, Custer City, Custer County, Oklahoma. > 2 Cecil Faye Newton Born: 03 JUN 1905, Thomas, Custer County, Oklahoma. > Died: SEP 1964, Denver, Colorado. > 1 Stephen Frazier Newton FTDNA#154293 > > The above sample represents the 2nd Project sample which (very likely) > traces to across the pond. > > Best, > > Gregg Bonner > NEWTON Surname DNA Project Group Administrator > > > > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > NEWTON-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes > in the subject and the body of the message

Reporting Node 28, with the following claimed descent: 7 Thomas Newton Born: England. Died: England. 6 William Newton Born: 19 SEP 1795, Chester, Cheshire, England. Died: 01 JUN 1836, Cheshire, England. 5 Clement Newton Born: 21 JUN 1826, Congleton, Cheshire, England. Died: 31 JAN 1872, New Brighton, Richmond County, New York. Note: Family stories and letters report that Clement Newton adopted his son, William Newton, b. 1845 after marrying William's mother. Other records and circumstances, however, indicate a strong possibility that Clement was in fact the biological father of William. 4 William Newton Born: 31 DEC 1845, Hanover Square, London, England. Died: 17 JUL 1929, Hot Springs, Fall River County, South Dakota. 3 Mark Hartley Newton Born: 11 FEB 1880, Harvard, Clay County, Nebraska. Died: 30 MAR 1949, Custer City, Custer County, Oklahoma. 2 Cecil Faye Newton Born: 03 JUN 1905, Thomas, Custer County, Oklahoma. Died: SEP 1964, Denver, Colorado. 1 Stephen Frazier Newton FTDNA#154293 The above sample represents the 2nd Project sample which (very likely) traces to across the pond. Best, Gregg Bonner NEWTON Surname DNA Project Group Administrator

----- Original Message ----- From: "Gregg Bonner" <greggbonner@yahoo.com> To: <newton@rootsweb.com> Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 10:03 PM Subject: [NEWTON] DNA Project updates (answering Monty's questions) Hi Monty, I believe you have a stale copy of the Project's HTML page in your browser's cache. If you load that page and then click the "refresh" button, then I think that you'll see that the last update date is 02 JUN 2009. At least that is the case for the Project website, which is here: http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~gbonner/newtondna/ For those who test at FTDNA (and sign the consent form), their results will "just show up" at this page: http://www.familytreedna.com/public/newton/default.aspx?section=yresults So your results will be put there automatically once they are in. But those are only the FTDNA results. Nothing just shows up at the Project webpage at RootsWeb. I have to code those pages, since I need to bring together data from multiple testing companies. Your results will show on the RootsWeb site as soon as the data is in, and I have the other data required to make your personal page (to see an example, click the name of an existing participant in the results table of the RootsWeb Project page). You can "get the latest" data for FTDNA samples at the familytreedna link above. For samples from other labs, or other things, the best way to get the news is to simply ask on this list as you have done. Best, Gregg Bonner Bethany, Oklahoma, USA --- On Mon, 6/22/09, Monty Newton <monty.newton@rrc.state.tx.us> wrote: > From: Monty Newton <monty.newton@rrc.state.tx.us> > Subject: Re: [NEWTON] DNA Project: Vol. 44 (John Newton son of Richard > Newton ofSudbury: Node J/27) > To: newton@rootsweb.com > Date: Monday, June 22, 2009, 10:42 AM > Why does the link provided - take me > to the results page - that reads 'last updated > 10/24/06.". Is this true? > I sent in my DNA kit a few weeks ago - will the 'results' > just show up? and how can I get the latest? > > > Monty Newton, P.G. > Technical Coordinator > Site Remediation > > > >>> Gregg Bonner <greggbonner@yahoo.com> > 6/5/2009 9:14 PM >>> > > Hi Folks, > > We have for some time known the DNA type of Richard Newton > of Sudbury, Massachusetts (c. 1605 - 1701). He is well > represented by the node J participants in the Project. We > now have a sample from a participant who descends from his > son, John Newton. This DNA unsurprisingly agrees very well > with what we had established already, but differs slightly > in the first 12 markers, so it gets a new Node, which, since > I ran out of letters, is going to be called 'Node "27"'. > Thus the original Richard is now represented by the > composite node called "J/27". We now have samples from > descendants of 3 of Richard Newton's sons. > > While it is unlikely that the mutation which changed the > node from J to 27 happened between Richard and John himself > (that is only one of 11 "begats") it is possible that this > DNA type will lead to a litmus test for descent from John > Newton, son of Richard. In any case, this mutation allows > for the parsing of the internal structure of the descent > tree provided any other descendant of John Newton ever > tests. Moreover, it demonstrates that any descendant tree > can be parsed - in principle - provided enough people test > enough markers. > > The Project homepage is here: > > http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~gbonner/newtondna/ > > > Cheers, > > Gregg Bonner > NEWTON Surname DNA Project Group Administrator > P.S. We still have 6 samples with data, but which lack > descent information AND/OR consent to release data. > > > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > NEWTON-request@rootsweb.com > with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the > subject and the body of the message > > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > NEWTON-request@rootsweb.com > with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the > subject and the body of the message > ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to NEWTON-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.12.89/2197 - Release Date: 06/23/09 05:54:00

Hi Folks, There are two different dates given on the Project webpage for revision dates. First, there is the date associated with "All project data", which is the link near the top of the Project webpage. Second, there is the date associated with last update of the webpage, which is given at the bottom of the Project webpage, just above my e-mail address. The 24 OCT 2006 date is referring to "all project data", and not "last update". I was confused because the verbiage in Monty's post quoted "last update", but gave the date associated with "all project data". The "last update" refers to the last time I revised the HTML at the Project webpage, even if it is just to correct a typo. But sometimes I make the revision, and forget to update the "last update" date stamp. In any case, it now reads 02 JUN 2009, as that is the last time I changed it. The "All project data" date (24 OCT 2006) is just the date associated with the last time all the Y-chromosome measurements (regardless of which lab did the testing, and how many markers were tested) were compiled into a single source document. The reason there is a main Project webpage with a results table, and also an "All project data" table is that there is need to represent two different widths of tables. In the main Project results table, only the first 25 markers are shown because of browser width limitations, even if participants tested at 37 or 67 markers. Having a data table 67 columns wide would cause readability problems for the non-tabular parts of the webpage. Since the other is just tabular data, it is okay to represent it in all its excessive width. The reason the "All project data" link has not been revised since the date given is because all data produced subsequent to that date is reflected in the data presented in the other link, that is to say, here: http://www.familytreedna.com/public/newton/default.aspx?section=yresults Thus the "all project data" really only serves as an archive for participants' DNA values beyond 25 markers where they tested somewhere other than FTDNA. I figured I would give the interested 3rd party a shot at all the values, even though interpretation has been possible in 25 markers in every case so far. Best, Gregg > > Why does the link provided - take me > > to the results page - that reads 'last updated > > 10/24/06.".

Gregg, I also got that same 'last updated 10/24/06", both on the link in Monty Newman's message and the link in this message. Refreshing does not change it. In my case there was no stale copy of the Project's HTML page in my browser's cache as I had deleted all files from my browser's cache last night, something I do every few days anyway. Ernest Young Floresville, TX GG-grandson of Larkin Newton. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Gregg Bonner" <greggbonner@yahoo.com> To: <newton@rootsweb.com> Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 4:03 PM Subject: [NEWTON] DNA Project updates (answering Monty's questions) Hi Monty, I believe you have a stale copy of the Project's HTML page in your browser's cache. If you load that page and then click the "refresh" button, then I think that you'll see that the last update date is 02 JUN 2009. At least that is the case for the Project website, which is here: http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~gbonner/newtondna/ For those who test at FTDNA (and sign the consent form), their results will "just show up" at this page: http://www.familytreedna.com/public/newton/default.aspx?section=yresults So your results will be put there automatically once they are in. But those are only the FTDNA results. Nothing just shows up at the Project webpage at RootsWeb. I have to code those pages, since I need to bring together data from multiple testing companies. Your results will show on the RootsWeb site as soon as the data is in, and I have the other data required to make your personal page (to see an example, click the name of an existing participant in the results table of the RootsWeb Project page). You can "get the latest" data for FTDNA samples at the familytreedna link above. For samples from other labs, or other things, the best way to get the news is to simply ask on this list as you have done. Best, Gregg Bonner Bethany, Oklahoma, USA --- On Mon, 6/22/09, Monty Newton <monty.newton@rrc.state.tx.us> wrote: > From: Monty Newton <monty.newton@rrc.state.tx.us> > Subject: Re: [NEWTON] DNA Project: Vol. 44 (John Newton son of Richard > Newton ofSudbury: Node J/27) > To: newton@rootsweb.com > Date: Monday, June 22, 2009, 10:42 AM > Why does the link provided - take me > to the results page - that reads 'last updated > 10/24/06.". Is this true? > I sent in my DNA kit a few weeks ago - will the 'results' > just show up? and how can I get the latest? > > > Monty Newton, P.G. > Technical Coordinator > Site Remediation > > > >>> Gregg Bonner <greggbonner@yahoo.com> > 6/5/2009 9:14 PM >>> > > Hi Folks, > > We have for some time known the DNA type of Richard Newton > of Sudbury, Massachusetts (c. 1605 - 1701). He is well > represented by the node J participants in the Project. We > now have a sample from a participant who descends from his > son, John Newton. This DNA unsurprisingly agrees very well > with what we had established already, but differs slightly > in the first 12 markers, so it gets a new Node, which, since > I ran out of letters, is going to be called 'Node "27"'. > Thus the original Richard is now represented by the > composite node called "J/27". We now have samples from > descendants of 3 of Richard Newton's sons. > > While it is unlikely that the mutation which changed the > node from J to 27 happened between Richard and John himself > (that is only one of 11 "begats") it is possible that this > DNA type will lead to a litmus test for descent from John > Newton, son of Richard. In any case, this mutation allows > for the parsing of the internal structure of the descent > tree provided any other descendant of John Newton ever > tests. Moreover, it demonstrates that any descendant tree > can be parsed - in principle - provided enough people test > enough markers. > > The Project homepage is here: > > http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~gbonner/newtondna/ > > > Cheers, > > Gregg Bonner > NEWTON Surname DNA Project Group Administrator > P.S. We still have 6 samples with data, but which lack > descent information AND/OR consent to release data. > > > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > NEWTON-request@rootsweb.com > with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the > subject and the body of the message > > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > NEWTON-request@rootsweb.com > with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the > subject and the body of the message > ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to NEWTON-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Hi Greg,   Just tried the "refresh" method of bringing up the 02 June 2009 page and it didn't work; still says 2006.   Connie   Descended from Rev. Richard Newton through Roswell Newton - 1752 (Rev. War ancestor)and his son Roswell Newton - 1791.   PS  Two years ago, I told my boss, Sterling E. "Ernie" Norris, Esq., I was going to DAR's Continental Congress in Washington DC.  He said that his mother was DAR and could I get a copy of her Application as he didn't know who his Rev. War Ancestor was.  At the DAR Library, I found his mother's Application and that his Rev. War ancestor, Sgt. Reuben Beach, crossed the Delaware with Washington, fought under Lafayette, and was discharged by Gen. Washington!  This year, Ernie's youngest daughter decided to join DAR so I did some more genealogical research and found that Ernie is my 9th cousin, once removed as we both descend from Rev. Richard Newton.  What's even funnier is that we had worked together seven years before Ernie told me that his mother was DAR.  As a labor of love, I found that Ernie and his girls have six other Rev. War ancestors. --- On Mon, 6/22/09, Gregg Bonner <greggbonner@yahoo.com> wrote: From: Gregg Bonner <greggbonner@yahoo.com> Subject: [NEWTON] DNA Project updates (answering Monty's questions) To: newton@rootsweb.com Date: Monday, June 22, 2009, 2:03 PM Hi Monty, I believe you have a stale copy of the Project's HTML page in your browser's cache. If you load that page and then click the "refresh" button, then I think that you'll see that the last update date is 02 JUN 2009. At least that is the case for the Project website, which is here: http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~gbonner/newtondna/ For those who test at FTDNA (and sign the consent form), their results will "just show up" at this page: http://www.familytreedna.com/public/newton/default.aspx?section=yresults So your results will be put there automatically once they are in. But those are only the FTDNA results. Nothing just shows up at the Project webpage at RootsWeb. I have to code those pages, since I need to bring together data from multiple testing companies. Your results will show on the RootsWeb site as soon as the data is in, and I have the other data required to make your personal page (to see an example, click the name of an existing participant in the results table of the RootsWeb Project page). You can "get the latest" data for FTDNA samples at the familytreedna link above. For samples from other labs, or other things, the best way to get the news is to simply ask on this list as you have done. Best, Gregg Bonner Bethany, Oklahoma, USA --- On Mon, 6/22/09, Monty Newton <monty.newton@rrc.state.tx.us> wrote: > From: Monty Newton <monty.newton@rrc.state.tx.us> > Subject: Re: [NEWTON] DNA Project: Vol. 44 (John Newton son of Richard Newton ofSudbury: Node J/27) > To: newton@rootsweb.com > Date: Monday, June 22, 2009, 10:42 AM > Why does the link provided - take me > to the results page - that reads 'last updated > 10/24/06.".  Is this true?    > I sent in my DNA kit a few weeks ago - will the 'results' > just show up?   and how can I get the latest? > > > Monty Newton, P.G. > Technical Coordinator > Site Remediation > > > >>> Gregg Bonner <greggbonner@yahoo.com> > 6/5/2009 9:14 PM >>> > > Hi Folks, > > We have for some time known the DNA type of Richard Newton > of Sudbury, Massachusetts (c. 1605 - 1701). He is well > represented by the node J participants in the Project. We > now have a sample from a participant who descends from his > son, John Newton. This DNA unsurprisingly agrees very well > with what we had established already, but differs slightly > in the first 12 markers, so it gets a new Node, which, since > I ran out of letters, is going to be called 'Node "27"'. > Thus the original Richard is now represented by the > composite node called "J/27". We now have samples from > descendants of 3 of Richard Newton's sons. > > While it is unlikely that the mutation which changed the > node from J to 27 happened between Richard and John himself > (that is only one of 11 "begats") it is possible that this > DNA type will lead to a litmus test for descent from John > Newton, son of Richard. In any case, this mutation allows > for the parsing of the internal structure of the descent > tree provided any other descendant of John Newton ever > tests. Moreover, it demonstrates that any descendant tree > can be parsed - in principle - provided enough people test > enough markers. > > The Project homepage is here: > > http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~gbonner/newtondna/ > > > Cheers, > > Gregg Bonner > NEWTON Surname DNA Project Group Administrator > P.S. We still have 6 samples with data, but which lack > descent information AND/OR consent to release data. > > >       >  > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to NEWTON-request@rootsweb.com > with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the > subject and the body of the message > >  >  > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to NEWTON-request@rootsweb.com > with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the > subject and the body of the message >       ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to NEWTON-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Hi Monty, I believe you have a stale copy of the Project's HTML page in your browser's cache. If you load that page and then click the "refresh" button, then I think that you'll see that the last update date is 02 JUN 2009. At least that is the case for the Project website, which is here: http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~gbonner/newtondna/ For those who test at FTDNA (and sign the consent form), their results will "just show up" at this page: http://www.familytreedna.com/public/newton/default.aspx?section=yresults So your results will be put there automatically once they are in. But those are only the FTDNA results. Nothing just shows up at the Project webpage at RootsWeb. I have to code those pages, since I need to bring together data from multiple testing companies. Your results will show on the RootsWeb site as soon as the data is in, and I have the other data required to make your personal page (to see an example, click the name of an existing participant in the results table of the RootsWeb Project page). You can "get the latest" data for FTDNA samples at the familytreedna link above. For samples from other labs, or other things, the best way to get the news is to simply ask on this list as you have done. Best, Gregg Bonner Bethany, Oklahoma, USA --- On Mon, 6/22/09, Monty Newton <monty.newton@rrc.state.tx.us> wrote: > From: Monty Newton <monty.newton@rrc.state.tx.us> > Subject: Re: [NEWTON] DNA Project: Vol. 44 (John Newton son of Richard Newton ofSudbury: Node J/27) > To: newton@rootsweb.com > Date: Monday, June 22, 2009, 10:42 AM > Why does the link provided - take me > to the results page - that reads 'last updated > 10/24/06.".  Is this true?    > I sent in my DNA kit a few weeks ago - will the 'results' > just show up?   and how can I get the latest? > > > Monty Newton, P.G. > Technical Coordinator > Site Remediation > > > >>> Gregg Bonner <greggbonner@yahoo.com> > 6/5/2009 9:14 PM >>> > > Hi Folks, > > We have for some time known the DNA type of Richard Newton > of Sudbury, Massachusetts (c. 1605 - 1701). He is well > represented by the node J participants in the Project. We > now have a sample from a participant who descends from his > son, John Newton. This DNA unsurprisingly agrees very well > with what we had established already, but differs slightly > in the first 12 markers, so it gets a new Node, which, since > I ran out of letters, is going to be called 'Node "27"'. > Thus the original Richard is now represented by the > composite node called "J/27". We now have samples from > descendants of 3 of Richard Newton's sons. > > While it is unlikely that the mutation which changed the > node from J to 27 happened between Richard and John himself > (that is only one of 11 "begats") it is possible that this > DNA type will lead to a litmus test for descent from John > Newton, son of Richard. In any case, this mutation allows > for the parsing of the internal structure of the descent > tree provided any other descendant of John Newton ever > tests. Moreover, it demonstrates that any descendant tree > can be parsed - in principle - provided enough people test > enough markers. > > The Project homepage is here: > > http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~gbonner/newtondna/ > > > Cheers, > > Gregg Bonner > NEWTON Surname DNA Project Group Administrator > P.S. We still have 6 samples with data, but which lack > descent information AND/OR consent to release data. > > >       > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to NEWTON-request@rootsweb.com > with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the > subject and the body of the message > > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to NEWTON-request@rootsweb.com > with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the > subject and the body of the message >

Why does the link provided - take me to the results page - that reads 'last updated 10/24/06.". Is this true? I sent in my DNA kit a few weeks ago - will the 'results' just show up? and how can I get the latest? Monty Newton, P.G. Technical Coordinator Site Remediation >>> Gregg Bonner <greggbonner@yahoo.com> 6/5/2009 9:14 PM >>> Hi Folks, We have for some time known the DNA type of Richard Newton of Sudbury, Massachusetts (c. 1605 - 1701). He is well represented by the node J participants in the Project. We now have a sample from a participant who descends from his son, John Newton. This DNA unsurprisingly agrees very well with what we had established already, but differs slightly in the first 12 markers, so it gets a new Node, which, since I ran out of letters, is going to be called 'Node "27"'. Thus the original Richard is now represented by the composite node called "J/27". We now have samples from descendants of 3 of Richard Newton's sons. While it is unlikely that the mutation which changed the node from J to 27 happened between Richard and John himself (that is only one of 11 "begats") it is possible that this DNA type will lead to a litmus test for descent from John Newton, son of Richard. In any case, this mutation allows for the parsing of the internal structure of the descent tree provided any other descendant of John Newton ever tests. Moreover, it demonstrates that any descendant tree can be parsed - in principle - provided enough people test enough markers. The Project homepage is here: http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~gbonner/newtondna/ Cheers, Gregg Bonner NEWTON Surname DNA Project Group Administrator P.S. We still have 6 samples with data, but which lack descent information AND/OR consent to release data. ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to NEWTON-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Hi Folks, We have for some time known the DNA type of Richard Newton of Sudbury, Massachusetts (c. 1605 - 1701). He is well represented by the node J participants in the Project. We now have a sample from a participant who descends from his son, John Newton. This DNA unsurprisingly agrees very well with what we had established already, but differs slightly in the first 12 markers, so it gets a new Node, which, since I ran out of letters, is going to be called 'Node "27"'. Thus the original Richard is now represented by the composite node called "J/27". We now have samples from descendants of 3 of Richard Newton's sons. While it is unlikely that the mutation which changed the node from J to 27 happened between Richard and John himself (that is only one of 11 "begats") it is possible that this DNA type will lead to a litmus test for descent from John Newton, son of Richard. In any case, this mutation allows for the parsing of the internal structure of the descent tree provided any other descendant of John Newton ever tests. Moreover, it demonstrates that any descendant tree can be parsed - in principle - provided enough people test enough markers. The Project homepage is here: http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~gbonner/newtondna/ Cheers, Gregg Bonner NEWTON Surname DNA Project Group Administrator P.S. We still have 6 samples with data, but which lack descent information AND/OR consent to release data.

Thanks for writing about me, I'm Z. Merle Newton On May 27, 2009, at 1:54 PM, Gregg Bonner wrote: > > Hi Folks, > > Those of you who have followed along with the growth of the NEWTON > Surname DNA Project know that each "new" type of NEWTON DNA gets its > own category, or node, and that the letters increment as that > happens. Well, we have reached "Z", and so I guess I'll need to give > some thought to what to do now. I guess next will be "AA". > Inelegant, to be sure, but these are good problems to have. This > dilemma is much better than being this far down the road and only > having a few types tested. > > The type "Z" NEWTON DNA is associated with a participant who claims > descent from one Israel Newton, born circa 1790, Wayne County, > Kentucky, died circa 1840, Cole County, Missouri. As more sample > come in, we hope to confirm this data, confirm results from other > shared descents, and to get even more new types in. > > The project also has six samples tested for whom the claimed descent > has not been identified AND/OR the consent to publish the results > has not yet been given. I hope that those will be added to the > project homepage soon. > > The homepage is here: > http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~gbonner/newtondna/ > > Best, > > Gregg > > > > > > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to NEWTON-request@rootsweb.com > with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and > the body of the message

Hi Gregg, Just wanted to advise you I have ordered an upgrade to 67 markers. I told Myron Newton about it and he ordered his upgrade also. I am also in the Scot DNA project. I guess some of the FTDNA people are going to Scotland this summer during the their large clan gathering. Ralph Newton ----- Original Message ----- From: "Gregg Bonner" <greggbonner@yahoo.com> To: <newton@rootsweb.com> Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2009 12:54 PM Subject: [NEWTON] DNA Project: Vol. 43 (Wayne County, Kentucky NEWTONs) > > Hi Folks, > > Those of you who have followed along with the growth of the NEWTON Surname > DNA Project know that each "new" type of NEWTON DNA gets its own category, > or node, and that the letters increment as that happens. Well, we have > reached "Z", and so I guess I'll need to give some thought to what to do > now. I guess next will be "AA". Inelegant, to be sure, but these are good > problems to have. This dilemma is much better than being this far down the > road and only having a few types tested. > > The type "Z" NEWTON DNA is associated with a participant who claims > descent from one Israel Newton, born circa 1790, Wayne County, Kentucky, > died circa 1840, Cole County, Missouri. As more sample come in, we hope to > confirm this data, confirm results from other shared descents, and to get > even more new types in. > > The project also has six samples tested for whom the claimed descent has > not been identified AND/OR the consent to publish the results has not yet > been given. I hope that those will be added to the project homepage soon. > > The homepage is here: > http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~gbonner/newtondna/ > > Best, > > Gregg > > > > > > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > NEWTON-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes > in the subject and the body of the message

Hi Folks, Those of you who have followed along with the growth of the NEWTON Surname DNA Project know that each "new" type of NEWTON DNA gets its own category, or node, and that the letters increment as that happens. Well, we have reached "Z", and so I guess I'll need to give some thought to what to do now. I guess next will be "AA". Inelegant, to be sure, but these are good problems to have. This dilemma is much better than being this far down the road and only having a few types tested. The type "Z" NEWTON DNA is associated with a participant who claims descent from one Israel Newton, born circa 1790, Wayne County, Kentucky, died circa 1840, Cole County, Missouri. As more sample come in, we hope to confirm this data, confirm results from other shared descents, and to get even more new types in. The project also has six samples tested for whom the claimed descent has not been identified AND/OR the consent to publish the results has not yet been given. I hope that those will be added to the project homepage soon. The homepage is here: http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~gbonner/newtondna/ Best, Gregg

Debora Brent You can check out Henry and Sarah Newton of Monroe Co. Tennessee at http://www.geocities.com/roznewton_2000/ and let me know if you see any connections to this line. Thank you for writing. I will be interested to see if you find any connections. Rose Sheldon Newton. ____________________________________________________________ Get your fix. Click here for reliable handyman services! http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2141/fc/BLSrjpTQdGICxBHUgCvRfJqfcovWtZF9WFGEIaWFvFFKmpCK8gvQqb7Ha96/

I think we are related. My Newton's come from McMinn County. It is close to Monroe and Hamilton counties. I'm descended from Edward Newton born 1782, GA. Married: Mary Grisham. His son: Jesse Newton born 1822, TN. Married: Abigail His Son: Edward Milton Newton born about 1849, GA Married: Mary Elizabeth Eaves, 1874, TN (he was married 3 times) His Son: James Edgar Newton Born: 1881, TN Married: Mattie Hammon Murphy Newton Ersie Newton Me Deborah Brent Never confuse a single defeat with a final defeat. ~ F. Scott Fitzgerald~

I was asked who are you? I am Rose Sheldon Newton wife of James Herbert Newton b. Miami, OKLA son of William Edgar Newton b. 1896 Warrensburg, MO son of Henry Newton b. 1868 in Hamilton or Monroe Co. TN son of William Gilbert Newton b. 1838 b. Monreo Co. mar America BEAN 7 Jun 1867 Hamilton Co., TN He was last son of Henry Newton b. ca 1800 Ireland(He said in Census)mar Sara____ b.1796 TN lived in Monroe Co. TN Ch: Eliza 1813, Priscilla 1815, Harrison 1817, Charles 1818, Lucinda 1820, Elijah 1822, James 1824, Elizabeth 1826, Sarah 1828, John 1830, Henry 1832, Francis Marion 1834,Martha Ann 1836, William Gilbert 1838. 1832 Henry was murdered, documented in Monroe Co. TN 1817 Harrison came to Grundy Co. MO- has descendants 1834 Francis Marian came to Mercer Co. MO - has descendants Martha Ann came to Mercer Co. MO with Francis did not marry. Have some war records some brothers may have fought on both sides of the war being in Monroe Co. TN (been there several times) and names in both sides unable to confirm further desc of these ch of Henry & Sarah. I wrote Wilda Newton Page when she was doing Newton Quarterly. Descendants on my web site if you google Henry and Sarah Newton. Rose Sheldon Newton Jim Newton of Fort Wayne, IN ____________________________________________________________ Click here for self-employed health insurance. Compare quotes! http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2141/fc/BLSrjpTFMQvM9FwjilPLPPxWDvsES89F7crsULYuvCd4Ft7eEiBDaJe7JMM/

Seemed to be time to try again. I am trying to locate the descendants of these four brothers, Their parents were Eugene "Peter" Newton b. 1878 VT and Nina Perham b. 29 Aug 1891 in NH Charles Newton, b. 1913 in Vermont Ernest Newton b. 21 Feb 1914 VT d. 25 Feb 1998 Rutland, VT Melvin Perham Newton b. 1916 or 1917 VT d.19 Jul 1999 Los Angeles, CA Warren B. Newton b. 6 Aug 1923 VT d. 8 Aug 1996 Klamath Falls, OR Spouse: Ruby