I’m guessing the size of the digest because people don;t know how to edit out the extraneous stuff. Given your two line email has 8 lines of header and space, (as will mine), not using the “highlight” function to include “only” the email you want to reply to, makes everything messy… On 6/08/2018, at 2:14 PM, new-zealand-request@rootsweb.com wrote: Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2018 14:14:34 +1200 From: "Vi" <raevc@xtra.co.nz <mailto:raevc@xtra.co.nz>> Subject: [nz]Re: NEW-ZEALAND Digest, Vol 13, Issue 200 To: <new-zealand@rootsweb.com <mailto:new-zealand@rootsweb.com>> Message-ID: <000401d42d2b$39202a80$ab607f80$@xtra.co.nz <mailto:000401d42d2b$39202a80$ab607f80$@xtra.co.nz>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" What has changed that we now get many digest emails per day? I prefer the old one a week

I agree with Julie Collins. Keep the regular postings of the Digests to a manageable size by editing (deleting) out all the extraneous stuff on the emails when responding. It is this which clogs up our emails. Susan Wann On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 4:04 PM, Julie Collins (Skellern) <jools@maxnet.co.nz > wrote: > I’m guessing the size of the digest because people don;t know how to edit > out the extraneous stuff. Given your two line email has 8 lines of header > and space, (as will mine), not using the “highlight” function to include > “only” the email you want to reply to, makes everything messy… > > On 6/08/2018, at 2:14 PM, new-zealand-request@rootsweb.com wrote: > > > > >